Note-Taking (Chapter 13) - The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education (original) (raw)

References

Aguilar-Roca, N. M., Williams, A. E., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2012). The impact of laptop-free zones on student performance and attitudes in large lectures. Computers and Education, 59, 1300–1308.Google Scholar

Aiken, G. A., Thomas, G. S., & Shennum, W. A. (1975). Memory for lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 439–444.CrossRef Google Scholar

Amer, A. A. (1994). The effect of knowledge-map and underlining training on the reading comprehension of scientific texts. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 35–45.Google Scholar

Anderson, T. H. & Anderson, B. B. (1984). Studying. In Pearson, P. D. (ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 657–679). New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Annis, L. & Davis, J. K. (1975). The effect of encoding and an external memory device on note taking. Journal of Experimental Education, 44, 44–46.Google Scholar

Armbruster, B. (2009). Notetaking from lectures. In Flippo, R. F., & Caverly, D. C. (eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research, 2nd edn. (pp. 220–248). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Arnold, K. M. Umanath, S., Thio, K. et al. (2017). Understanding the cognitive processes involved in writing to learn. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23, 115–127.Google Scholar

Austin, J., Lee, M., & Carr, J. (2004). The effects of guided notes on undergraduate students’ recording of lecture content. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 314–320.Google Scholar

Bahr, G. S. & Dansereau, D. F. (2001). Bilingual knowledge maps (BiK-Maps) in second-language vocabulary learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 5–24.Google Scholar

Bahr, G. S. & Dansereau, D. F. (2005). Bilingual knowledge maps (BiK-Maps) as a presentation format: Delayed recall and training effects. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73, 101–118.Google Scholar

Barnett, J. E., DiVesta, F. J., & Rogozinski, J. T. (1981). What is learned in note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 181–192.Google Scholar

Benton, S. L., Kiewra, K. A., Whitfill, J. M., & Dennison, R. (1993). Encoding and external-storage effects on writing processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 267–280.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1982). From conversation to composition: The role of instruction in a developmental process. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Advances in instruction, Vol. 2 (pp. 1–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Berninger, V. (2012). Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Jones, J., Wolf, B. J., Gould, L., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., Shimada, S., & Apel, K. (2006). Early development of language by hand: Composing-, reading-, listening-, and speaking- connections, three letter writing modes, and fast mapping in spelling. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 61–92.Google Scholar

Berninger, V. W. & Richards, T. L. (2012). The writing brain: Coordinating sensory/motor, language, and cognitive systems in working memory. In Berninger, V. W. (ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Berninger, V. W. & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In Butterfield, E. (ed.), Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 57–81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Blair, A. (2004). Note taking as an art of transmission. Critical Inquiry, 31, 85–107.Google Scholar

Boyle, J. R. (2010a). Note-taking skills of middle school students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43 ( 6 ), 530–540.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boyle, J. R. (2010b). Strategic note-taking for middle-school students with learning disabilities in science classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 93–109.Google Scholar

Boyle, J. R. (2013). Strategic note-taking for inclusive middle school science classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 34(2), 78–90.Google Scholar

Boyle, J. R. & Weishaar, M. (2001). The effects of a strategic note-taking technique on the comprehension and long term recall of lecture information for high school students with LD. LD Research and Practice, 16, 125–133.Google Scholar

Bretzing, B. H., Kulhavy, R. W., & Caterino, L. C. (1987). Notetaking by junior high students. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 359–362.Google Scholar

Brown, A. L. & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing text: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1–14.Google Scholar

Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing text. Child Development, 54, 968–979.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A., (2014). Make it stick: The science of successful learning. New York: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Brown, A. L. & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1–8.Google Scholar

Brown, A. L. & Smiley, S. S. (1978). The development of strategies for studying. Child Development, 49, 1076–1088.Google Scholar

Brown, A. L., Smiley, S. S., & Lawton, S. Q. C. (1978). The effects of experience on the selection of suitable retrieval cues for studying texts. Child Development, 49, 829–835.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bui, D. C. & Myerson, J. (2014). The role of working memory abilities in lecture note-taking. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 12–22.Google Scholar

Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 36, 1118–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019902 Google Scholar

Chmielewski, T. L. & Dansereau, D. F. (1998). Enhancing the recall of text: Knowledge mapping training promotes implicit transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 407–413.Google Scholar

Cohn, E., Cohn, S., & Bradley, J. (1995). Notetaking, working memory, and learning in principles of economics. Research in Economic Education, 26, 291–307.Google Scholar

Crawford, C. C. (1925). The correlation between lecture notes and quiz papers. Journal of Educational Research, 12, 282–291.Google Scholar

Dahlstrom, E., Walker, J. D., & Dziuban, C. (2013). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2012. Boulder, CO: Educause Center for Applied Research.Google Scholar

Dansereau, D. F. & Simpson, D. D. (2009). A picture is worth a thousand words: The case for graphic representations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 104–110.Google Scholar

Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627–634.Google Scholar

DiCecco, V. M. & Gleason, M. M. ( 2002 ). Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository text. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 306–320.Google Scholar

DiVesta, F. J. & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 321–325.Google Scholar

Dunkel, P. & Davy, S. (1989). The heuristic of lecture notetaking: Perceptions of American and international students regarding the value and practice of notetaking. English for Specific Purposes, 8, 33–50.Google Scholar

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58.Google Scholar

Fisher, J. L. & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effect of note-taking and review on recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 321–325.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J. M. (2000). Younger and older jurors: The influence of environmental supports on memory performance and decision making in complex trials. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/55.6.P323 Google Scholar

ForsterLee, L., Horowitz, I. A., & Bourgeois, M. (1994). Effects of notetaking on verdicts and evidence processing in a civil trial. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 567–578.Google Scholar

Frank, B. M. (1984). Effect of field independence-dependence and study technique on learning from lecture. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 669–678.Google Scholar

Frank, B. M., Garlinger, D. K., & Kiewra, K. A. (1989). Use of embedded heading and intact online with videotaped instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 277–281.Google Scholar

Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers and Education, 50(3),906–914.Google Scholar

Gleason, J. (2012). An investigation of the lecture note-taking skills of adolescents with and without attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: An extension of previous research. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City.Google Scholar

Grabe, M., Christopherson, K., & Douglas, J. (2005). Providing introductory psychology students access to on-line notes: The relationship of note use to performance and class attendance. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33, 295–308.Google Scholar

Greene, E. B. (1928). The relative effectiveness of lecture and individual reading as methods of college teaching, Genetic Psychology Monographs, 4, 459–563.Google Scholar

Hadwin, A. F., Kirby, J. R., & Woodhouse, R. A. (1999). Individual differences in notetaking, summarization, and learning from lectures. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 45, 1–17.Google Scholar

Hamaker, C. (1986). The effects of adjunct questions on prose learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 212–242.Google Scholar

Hamilton, S. L., Seibert, M. A., Gardner, R., & Talbert-Johnson, C. (2000). Using guided notes to improve the academic achievement of incarcerated adolescents with learning and behavior problems. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 133–140.Google Scholar

Hartley, J. (2002). Notetaking in non-academic settings: a review. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 559–574.Google Scholar

Hartley, J. & Cameron, A. (1967). Some observations on the efficiency of lecturing. Educational Review, 20, 30–37.Google Scholar

Hartley, J. & Davies, I. K. (1978). Note-taking: A critical review. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 15, 207–224.Google Scholar

Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. (eds.), The science of writing (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hembrooke, H. & Gay, G. (2003). The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15, 46–64.Google Scholar

Heuer, L. & Penrod, S. (1988). Increasing jurors’ participation in trials: A field experiment with jury notetaking and question asking. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 231–262.Google Scholar

Heuer, L. & Penrod, S. (1994). Juror notetaking and question asking during trials. Law and Human Behavior 18, 121–150.Google Scholar

Hope, L., Eales, N., & Mirashi, A. (2014). Assisting jurors: Promoting recall of trial information through the use of a trial‐ordered notebook. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 99, 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12003 Google Scholar

Horowitz, I. A. & ForsterLee, L. (2001). The effects of note-taking and trial transcript access on mock jury decisions in a complex civil trial. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 373–391.Google Scholar

Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & Bergerud, D. (1990). The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 12–22.Google Scholar Google Scholar

Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & Bergerud, D. (1975). Taking notes and human learning. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 28, 158–161.Google Scholar

Hughes, C. A. & Suritsky, S. K. (1994). Note-taking skills of university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 20–24.Google Scholar

Hulme, C. & Snowling, M. J. (2011). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties: Nature, causes, and treatments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 139–142.Google Scholar

Jing, H. G., Szpunar, K. K., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Interpolated testing influences focused attention and improves integration of information during a video-recorded lecture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22, 305–318.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., Smeekens, B. A., von Bastian, C. C. et al. (2017). A combined experimental and individual-differences investigation into mind wandering during a video lecture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 1649–1647.Google Scholar

Kaufman, D. F., Zhao, R., & Yang, Y-S. (2011). Effects of online note taking formats and self-monitoring prompts on learning from online text: Using technology to enhance self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 313–322.Google Scholar

Kay, R. H. & Lauricella, S. (2011). Unstructured vs. structured use of laptops in higher education. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 33–42.Google Scholar

Kay, R. H. & Lauricella, S. (2014). Investigating the Benefits and Challenges of Using Laptop Computers in Higher Education Classrooms. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 40, 1–25.Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A (1983). The process of review: A levels of processing approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 366–374.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A (1985a). Investigating note-taking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23–32.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A (1985b). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147–172.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A (1985c). Students’ notetaking behaviors and the efficacy of providing the instructor’s notes for review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 378–386.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A (1985d). Learning from a lecture: An investigation of notetaking, review, and attendance at a lecture. Human Learning, 4, 73–77.Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A (1987). Notetaking and review: The research and its implications. Instructional Science, 16, 233–249.Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147–172.Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A. & Benton, S. L. (1988). The relationship between information processing ability and notetaking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 33–44.Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., Kim, S.-I., Risch, N., & Christensen, M. (1995). Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 33–44.Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., & Lewis, L. B. (1987). Qualitative aspects of notetaking and their relationship with information-processing ability and academic achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 14, 110–117.Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christensen, M., Kim, S.-I., & Lindberg, N. (1989). A more equitable account of the note-taking functions in learning from lecture and from text. Instructional Sciences, 18, 217–232.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., & McShane, A. (1988). Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 595–597.Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D. et al. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240–245.Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A. & Fletcher, H. J. (1984). The relationship between levels of note-taking and achievement. Human Learning, 3, 273–280.Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A. & Frank, B. M. (1988). Encoding and external-storage effects of personal lecture notes, skeletal notes, and detailed notes for field-independent and field-dependent learners. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 143–148.Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A. & Mayer, R. E. (1997). Effects of advanced organizers and repeated presentations on students learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 147–159.Google Scholar

Kiewra, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Christensen, M., Kim, S., & Risch, N. (1991). Effects of repetition on recall and note-taking: Strategies for learning from lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 120–123.Google Scholar

King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303–323.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. J. & Vipond, D. (1979). Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In Nilsson, L. (Ed.), Perspectives on memory search (pp. 325–366). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Knight, L. J. & McKelvie, S. J. (1986). Effects of attendance, note taking and review on memory for a lecture: Encoding vs. external storage function of notes. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 18, 52–61.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limit the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 242–262.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of notetaking/‐reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta‐analytic review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 459–477.Google Scholar

Kraushaar, J. M. & Novak, D. C. (2010). Examining the effects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21, 241–251.Google Scholar

Landrum, R. E. (2010). Faculty and student perceptions of providing instructor lecture notes to students: Match or mismatch? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37, 216–221.Google Scholar

Lazarus, B. D. (1993). Guided notes: Effects with secondary and post secondary students with mild disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 272–289.Google Scholar

Locke, E. A. (1977). An empirical study of lecture notetaking among college students. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 93–99.Google Scholar

Maddox, H. & Hoole, E. (1975). Performance decrement in the lecture. Educational Review, 28, 17–30.Google Scholar

Maqsud, M. (1980). Effects of personal lecture notes and teacher-notes on recall of university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 289–294.Google Scholar

McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35, 13–23.Google Scholar

McCutchen, D. (2012). Phonological, orthographic, and morphological word-level skills supporting multiple levels of the writing process. In Berninger, V. (ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

McCutchen, D., Covill, A., Hoyne, S. H., & Mildes, K. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 256–266.Google Scholar

McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. III (2011). Test-enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: The effects of quiz frequency and placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 399–414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021782 Google Scholar

McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 494–513.Google Scholar

McIntyre, S. (1992). Lecture notetaking, information processing, and academic achievement. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 25, 7–17.Google Scholar

Moore, D. W. & Readence, J. E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research, 78,11–17.Google Scholar

Moos, D. C. & Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 270–298.Google Scholar

Morgan, C. H., Lilly, J. D., & Boreham, N. C. (1988). Learning from lectures: The effect of varying detail in lecture handouts to note-taking and recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2, 115–122.Google Scholar

Mueller, P. A. & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25, 1159–1168.Google Scholar

Mulcahy‐Ernt, P. I. & Caverly, D. C. (2009). Strategic study‐reading. In Flippo, R. F., & Caverly, D. C. (eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research, 2nd edn (pp. 177–198). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Neef, N. A., McCord, B. E., & Ferreri, S. J. (2006). Effects of guided notes versus completed notes during lectures on college students’ quiz performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 123–130.Google Scholar

Nesbit, J. C. & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413–448.Google Scholar

Nye, P. (1978). Student variables in relations to note-taking during a lecture. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 15, 196–200.Google Scholar

Oefinger, L. M. (2014). The lecture note-taking skills of adolescents with and without a learning disabilities. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, A. M. & Adenwalla, D. (1991). Using cooperative learning and concept maps with deaf college students. In Martin, D. S. (ed.), Advances in cognition, learning, and deafness (pp. 348–355). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 71–86.CrossRef Google Scholar

Olive, T., Alves, R. A., & Castro, S. L. (2009). Cognitive processes in writing during pauses and execution periods. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 758–785.Google Scholar

Olive, T. & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written composition. Memory and Cognition, 30, 594–600.Google Scholar

Palmatier, R. A. & Bennett, J. M. (1974). Notetaking habits of college students. Journal of Reading, 18, 215–218.Google Scholar

Patterson, M. E., Dansereau, D. F., & Newbern, D. (1992). Effects of communication aids and strategies on cooperative teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 453–461.Google Scholar

Peverly, S. T. (2006). The Importance of handwriting speed in adult writing. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 197–216.Google Scholar

Peverly, S. T., Brobst, K., Graham, M., & Shaw, R. (2003). College adults are not good at self-regulation: A study on the relationship of self-regulation, note-taking, and test-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 335–346.Google Scholar

Peverly, S. T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C. et al. (2007). What predicts skill in lecture note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 167–180.Google Scholar

Peverly, S. T. & Sumowski, J. F. (2012).What variables predict quality of text notes and are text notes related to performance on different types of tests? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26: 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1802.Google Scholar

Peverly, S. T., Vekaria, P. C., Reddington, L. A. Sumowski, J. F. Johnson, K. R., & Ramsay, C. M. (2013). The relationship of handwriting speed, working memory, language comprehension and outlines to lecture Note-taking and Test-taking among college students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2881 Google Scholar

Peverly, S. T. & Wood, R. (2001). The effects of adjunct questions and feedback on improving the reading comprehension skills of learning-disabled adolescents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 25–43.Google Scholar

Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 291–312.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74.Google Scholar

Reddington, L. A., Peverly, S. T., & Block, C. J. (2015). An examination of some of the cognitive and motivation variables related to gender differences in lecture note-taking. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 1155–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015–9566-z Google Scholar

Reimer, J. R., Brimhall, E., Cao, C., & O’Reilly, K. (2009). Empirical user studies inform the design of an e-notetaking and information assimilation system for students in higher education. Computers and Education, 52, 893–913.Google Scholar

Rickards, J. P. & Friedman, F. (1978). The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 136–143.Google Scholar

Richards, T., Peverly, S., Wolf, A., Abbott, R., Tanimoto, S., Thompson, R., Nagy, W., & Berninger, V. (2016). Idea units in notes and summaries for read texts by keyboard and pencil in middle childhood students with specific learning disabilities: Cognitive and brain findings. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 5, 146–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2016.07.005 Google Scholar

Robinson, D. H. (1998). Graphic organizers as aids to text learning. Reading Research and Instruction, 37, 85–105.Google Scholar

Roediger, H. L., Agarwal, P. K., McDaniel, M. A., & McDermott, K. B. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: long-term improvements from quizzing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 17, 382–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026252 Google Scholar

Rohwer, W. D. (1984). An invitation to a developmental psychology of studying. In Morrison, F. J., Lord, C. A., & Keating, D. P. (eds.), Advances in applied developmental psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 1–57). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Rosenhan, D. L., Eisner, S. L., & Robinson, R. J. (1994). Notetaking can aid juror recall. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 53–61.Google Scholar

Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221.Google Scholar

Rothkopf, E. Z. (1996). Control of mathemagenic activities. In Jonassen, D. H. (ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 879–896). New York: Simon & Schuster and Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ruhl, K. L. (1996). Does nature of student activity during lecture pauses affect notes and immediate recall of college students with learning disabilities? Journal of Postsecondary education and Disability, 12, 16–27.Google Scholar

Ruhl, K. L., Hughes, C. A., & Gajar, A. H. (1990). Efficacy of the pause procedure for enhancing learning disabled and nondisabled college students’ long- and short-term recall of facts presented through lecture. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 55–64.Google Scholar

Ruhl, K. L., Hughes, C. A., & Schloss, P. J. (1987). Using the pause procedure to enhance lecture recall, Teacher Education and Special Education, 10, 14–18.Google Scholar

Ruhl, K. L. & Suritsky, S. (1995). The pause procedure and/or an outline: Effect on Immediate free recall and lecture notes taken by college students with disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 2–11.Google Scholar

Rummer, R, Schweppe, J., Gerst, K., & Wagner, S. (2017). Is testing a more effective strategy than note-taking? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 293–300.Google Scholar

Samuels, S. J. & Farstrup, A. E. (eds.) (2011). What research has to say about reading instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar

Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers and Education, 62, 24–31.Google Scholar

Schacter, D. L. & Szpunar, K. K. (2015). Enhancing attention and memory during video-recorded lectures. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1, 60–71.Google Scholar

Shimmerlick, S. M. & Nolan, J. D. (1976). Organization and the recall of prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 779–786.Google Scholar

Snow, C. (2002). (ed.) Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar

Spitzer, H. F. (1939). Studies in retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 641–656.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.Google Scholar

Stull, A. T. & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 808–820.Google Scholar

Summers, J. & Catarro, F. (2003). Assessment of handwriting speed and factors influencing written output of university students in examinations. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 50, 148–157.Google Scholar

Szpunar, K. K., Khan, N. Y., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 6313–6317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221764110 Google Scholar

Thomas, G. S. (1978). Use of students notes and lecture summaries as study guides for recall. Journal of Educational Research, 71, 316–319.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. W., Iventosch, L., Rohwer, W. D. (1987). Relationships among student characteristics, study activities, and achievement as a function of course characteristics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 344–364.Google Scholar

Thorley, C., Baxter, R.E., & Lorek, J. (2016). The impact of note taking style and note availability at retrieval on mock jurors’ recall and recognition of trial information. Memory, 24, 560–574.Google Scholar

Titsworth, B. (2004). Students’ notetaking: The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity. Communication Education, 53, 305–320.Google Scholar

Titsworth, B. S. & Kiewra, K. A. (2004). Spoken organizational lecture cures and student notetaking as facilitators of student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 447–461.Google Scholar

Titsworth, S. (2001). The effects of teacher immediacy, use of organizational lecture cues, and students’ notetaking on cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 283–297.Google Scholar

Trevors, G., Duffy, M., & Azevedo, R. (2014). Note-taking within MetaTutor: Interaction between an intelligent tutoring system and prior knowledge on note-taking and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 507–528.Google Scholar

Van Etten, S., Freebern, G., & Pressley, M. (1997). College students’ beliefs about exam preparation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 192–212.Google Scholar

Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note taking derived from their perceptions of note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 323–338.Google Scholar

Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.Google Scholar

Vogler, K. (2006). Impact of a high school graduation examination on Tennessee science teachers’ instructional practices. American Secondary Education, 35, 35–57.Google Scholar

Weinstein, Y., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2010). A comparison of study strategies for passages: rereading, answering questions, and generating questions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 16, 308–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020992 Google Scholar

Wiegmann, D. A., Dansereau, D. F., & McCagg, E. C., Rewey, K. L., & Pitre, U. (1992). Effects of knowledge map characteristics on information processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 136–155.Google Scholar

Winne, P. H. & Hadwin, A. F. (2009). Studying as self-regulation. In Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Witkin, H. A. (1959). The perception of the upright. Scientific American, 200, 50–56Google Scholar

Wurst, C., Smarkola, C., & Gaffney, M. A. (2008). Ubiquitous laptop usage in higher education: Effects on student achievement, student satisfaction, and constructivist measures in honors and traditional class-rooms. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1766–1783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.006 Google Scholar

Yamamoto, K. (2007). Banning laptops in the classroom: Is it worth the hassle? Journal of Legal Education, 57, 477–520.Google Scholar