Methods in coccidiosis research: separation of oocysts from faeces | Parasitology | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Extract

Factors which may be important in the large-scale extraction of coccidial oocysts from faeces have been investigated with Eimeria tenella. Age of bird, inoculum, feeding status at the time of inoculation, period of collection, feeding status during collection, collection medium, homogenization and sieving, flotation, washing, sporulation and further purification have all been considered. The aim has been to establish a method to produce the maximum number of oocysts of a required degree of purity and viability, with the expenditure of the minimum amount of physical effort, time, animals and chemicals. In our method, groups of chickens 3–4 weeks of age are inoculated with 5000 oocysts of E. tenella and food is supplied ad lib. Over the period 5–8 days after inoculation, faeces are collected in trays containing 2% (w/v) potassium dichromate solution, while food intake is restricted. The faecal material is homogenized, passed once through 40 and 100 mesh sieves, centrifuged and the oocysts recovered from the sediment by 3 flotations in saturated salt solution. Following washing, oocysts are sporulated by forced aeration at 30°C and may be further purified by hypochlorite treatment, or passage in 5% Tween 80 solution through a glass bead column followed by sucrose density gradient centri-fugation. Routine passages along these lines over a 5 year period have given a recovery of 46% of the oocysts excreted by over 7000 birds.

References

Davies, S. F. M., Joyner, L. P. & Kendall, S. B. (1963). Coccidiosis. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar

Edgar, S. A. (1954). Effect of temperature on the sporulation of oocysts of the protozoan, Eimeria tenella. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 73, 237–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edgar, S. A. (1964). Stable coccidiosis immunization. U. S. Patent 3,147,186.Google Scholar

Hein, H. (1968). The pathogenic effects of Eimeria acervulina in young chicks. Experimental Parasitology 22, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nyberg, P. A. & Knapp, S. E. (1970). Effect of sodium hypochlorite on the oocyst wall of Eimeria tenella as shown by electron microscopy. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 37, 32–6.Google Scholar

Patnaik, B. (1966). A technique of obtaining oocysts of coccidia in pure state from chicken faeces by modified Marquardt's method. Indian Veterinary Journal 43, 414–22.Google ScholarPubMed

Ryley, J. F., Millard, B. J. & Long, P. L. (1972). Further studies on the life cycle of Eimeria brunetti Levine 1942. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 40, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sharma, W., Reid, W. M. & Foster, J. W. (1963). A cleaning method for coccidial oocysts using density-gradient sedimentation. Journal of Parasitology 49, 159–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, R. R. & Ruff, M. D. (1975). A rapid technique for the cleaning and concentration of Eimeria oocysts. Poultry Science 54, 2081–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vetterling, J. M. (1969). Continuous-flow differential density flotation of coccidial oocysts and a comparison with other methods. Journal of Parasitology 55, 412–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wagenbach, G. E. (1969). Purification of Eimeria tenella sporozoites with glass bead columns. Journal of Parasitology 55, 833–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilson, P. A. G. & Fairbairn, D. (1961). Biochemistry of sporulation in oocysts of Eimeria acervulina. Journal of Protozoology 8, 410–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar