Agent-based models and hypothesis testing: an example of innovation and organizational networks | The Knowledge Engineering Review | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Hypothesis testing is uncommon in agent-based modeling and there are many reasons why (see Fagiolo et al. (2007) for a review). This is one of those uncommon studies: a combination of the new and old. First, a traditional neoclassical model of decision making is broadened by introducing agents who interact in an organization. The resulting computational model is analyzed using virtual experiments to consider how different organizational structures (different network topologies) affect the evolutionary path of an organization's corporate culture. These computational experiments establish testable hypotheses concerning structure, culture, and performance, and those hypotheses are tested empirically using data from an international sample of firms. In addition to learning something about organizational structure and innovation, the paper demonstrates how computational models can be used to frame empirical investigations and facilitate the interpretation of results in a traditional fashion.

References

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B. 1988. Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. The American Economic Review 78(4), 678–690.Google Scholar

Axtell, R., Axelrod, R., Epstein, J., Cohen, M. 1997. Aligning simulation models: a case study and results. In The Complexity of Cooperation, Axelrod, R. (ed.). Princeton University Press, 181–205.Google Scholar

Burns, T., Stalker, G. M. 1968. The Management of Innovation. Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar

Carley, K. M., Lin, Z. 1997. Organizational decision making and error in a dynamic task environment. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 100, 720–749.Google Scholar

Chang, M., Harrington, J. E. 2005. Discovery and diffusion of knowledge in an endogenous social network. American Journal of Sociology 110, 937–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, W. M., Klepper, S. 1996. A reprise of size and R & D. The Economic Journal 106, 925–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denison, D. R., Mishra, A. K. 1995. Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science 6(2), 204–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fagiolo, G., Windrum, P., Moneta, A. 2007. A critical guide to empirical validation of agent-based models in economics: methodologies, procedures, and open problems. Computational Economics 30(3), 195–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrington, J. E. 1998. The social selection of flexible and rigid agents. The American Economic Review 88(1), 63–82.Google Scholar

Harrison, J. R., Carroll, G. R. 2006. Culture and Demography in Organizations. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, M. 2005. A survey of models of network formation: stability and efficiency. In Group Formation in Economics: Networks, Clubs, and Coalitions. Demange, G. and Wooders, M. (eds). Cambridge University Press, 11–57.Google Scholar

Mansfield, E. 1981. Composition of R & D expenditures: relationship to size of firm, concentration and innovative output. Review of Economics and Statistics 63, 610–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organizational Science 2(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menon, A., Bharadwaj, S. G., Adidam, P. T., Edison, S. W. 1999. Antecedents and consequences of marketing strategy making: a model and a test. Journal of Marketing 63(April), 18–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nakata, C., Sivakumar, K. 1996. National culture and new product development: an integrative review. Journal of Marketing 60, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J. A. 1996. Culture as social control: corporations, culture and commitment. In Research in Organizational Behavior, Staw, B. M. and Cummings, L. L. (eds). JAI Press, 18, 157–200.Google Scholar

O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., Caldwell, D. F. 1991. People and organizational culture: a profile comparison approach to assessing person–organization fit. Academy of Management Journal 34, 487–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ravasi, D., Schultz, M. 2006. Responding to organizational identity threats: exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal 49, 433–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scherer, F. M. 1982. Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. Review of Economics and Statistics 64, 627–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scherer, F. M. 1992. Schumpeter and plausible capitalism. Journal of Economic Literature 30(3), 1416–1433.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper.Google Scholar

Smircich, L. 1983. Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Song, M. X., Parry, M. E. 1997. The determinants of Japanese new product success. Journal of Marketing Research 34, 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Song, M. X., Souder, W. E., Dyer, B. 1997. A causal model of the impact of skills, synergy, and design sensitivity on new product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14(2), 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sørensen, J. B. 2002. The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 47, 70–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Souder, W. 1996. Interprod: An International Study of New Product Innovation. Center for the Management of Science and Technology (CMOST), University of Alabama.Google Scholar

Teece, D. J. 1996. Firm organization, industrial structure and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 31, 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vriend, N. J. 2006. CE models of endogenous interactions. In Handbook of Computational Economics: Agent-Based Computational Economics, Tesfatsion, L. and Judd, K. L. (ed.). North Holland, 1047–1079.Google Scholar

Wilhite, A. 2006a. Economic Activity on Fixed Networks. In Handbook of Computational Economics: Agent – Based Computational Economics, Tesfatsion, L. and Judd, K. L. (eds). North Holland, 1012–1045.Google Scholar

Wilhite, A. 2006b. Protection and social order. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 61, 691–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, H. P., Burke, M. A. 2001. Competition and custom in economic contracts: a case study of Illinois agriculture. American Economic Review 91, 559–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar