Risk, resilience, and recovery: Perspectives from the Kauai Longitudinal Study | Development and Psychopathology | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

This article summarizes the major findings of a longitudinal study that traced the developmental paths of a multiracial cohort of children who had been exposed to perinatal stress, chronic poverty, and a family environment troubled by chronic discord and parental psychopathology. Individuals are members of the Kauai Longitudinal Study, which followed all children born in 1955 on a Hawaiian island from the perinatal period to ages 1, 2, 10, 18, and 32 years. Several clusters of protective factors and processes were identified that enabled most of these high-risk individuals to become competent and caring adults. Implications of the findings for developmental theory and social action programs are discussed, and issues for future research are identified.

References

Caspi, A., Elder, G. H., & Bem, D. J. (1988). Moving away from the world: Life course patterns of shy children. Developmental Psychology, 24, 824–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicchetti, D. (in press). Developmental psychopathology: Reactions, reflections, projections. Developmental Review.Google Scholar

Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (1992). The role of developmental theory in prevention and intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, M. (1993). The kindness of strangers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Furstenberg, F. F., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Morgan, S. P. (1987). Adolescent mothers in later life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garmezy, N., & Rutter, M. (Eds.). (1983). Stress, coping and development in children. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Gough, H. (1969). California psychological inventory manual (rev. ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Horowitz, F. D. (1987). Exploring developmental theories: Toward a structural/behavioral model of development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lohmöller, J. G. (1984). LVPLS program manual with partial least-square estimates. Cologne: Zen-tralarchiv für Empirische Sozial Forschung.Google Scholar

Magnusson, D. (1988). Individual development from an interactional perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Masten, A. (1990). Resilience in development: Implications of the study of successful adaptation for developmental psychopathology. In Cicchetti, D. (Ed.), Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology: Vol. 1. The emergence of a discipline (pp. 261–294). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Rachman, S. (1979). The concept of required helpfulness. Behavior Research and Therapy, 17, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 316–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scan, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype → environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.Google Scholar

Super, C., & Harkness, S. (1986). The developmental niche: A conceptualization of the interface between child and culture. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 545–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werner, E. E. (1990). Protective factors and individual resiliencè. In Meisel, S. & Shonkoff, J. (Eds.), Handbook of early intervention (pp. 97–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1977). Kauai's children come of age. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1989). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: Adams-Bannister-Cox. (Original work published 1982)Google Scholar

Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfgang, M. E., Thornberry, T. P., & Figlio, R. M. (1987). From boy to man: From delinquency to crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar