Could resource rents finance universal access to infrastructure? A first exploration of needs and rents | Environment and Development Economics | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

It is often argued that, ethically, resource rents should accrue to all citizens. Yet, in reality, the rents from exploiting national resources are often concentrated in the hands of a few. If resource rents were to be taxed, on the other hand, substantial amounts of public money could be raised and used to cover the population's infrastructure needs, such as access to electricity, water, sanitation, communication technology and roads, which all play important roles in a nation's economic development process. Here, the authors examine to what extent existing resource rents could be used to provide universal access to these infrastructures.

References

Arnott, R.J. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1979), ‘Aggregate land rents, expenditure on public goods, and optimal city size’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 93(4): 471–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L., G., et al. (2004), ‘Are we consuming too much?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(3): 147–172.Google Scholar

Barma, N.H., Kaiser, K., Le, T.M., and Vinuela, L. (2012), Rents to Riches? The Political Economy of Natural Resource-Led Development, Washington, DC: World Bank, [Available at] http://ideas.repec.org/b/wbk/wbpubs/2381.html.Google Scholar

Calderón, C.A. and Servén, L. (2014), ‘The effects of infrastructure development on growth and income distribution’, Annals of Economics and Finance 15(2): 521–534.Google Scholar

Caselli, F. and Michaels, G. (2013), ‘Do oil windfalls improve living standards? Evidence from Brazil’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5(1): 208–238.Google Scholar

Dhillon, A. and Perroni, C. (2001), ‘Tax earmarking and grass-roots accountability’, Economics Letters 72(1): 99–106.Google Scholar

Drèze, J. and Sen, A. (2013), An Uncertain Glory: India and Its Contradictions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Edenhofer, O., Mattauch, L., and Siegmeier, J. (2013), ‘Hypergeorgism: when is rent taxation as a remedy for insufficient capital accumulation socially optimal?’, CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4144, CESifo Group, Munich, [Available at] http://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_4144.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldstein, M.S. (1977), ‘The surprising incidence of a tax on pure rent: a new answer to an old question’, Journal of Political Economy 85(2): 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaffney, M. (2009), ‘The hidden taxable capacity of land: enough and to spare’, International Journal of Social Economics 36(4): 328–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garnaut, R. (2010), ‘Principles and practice of resource rent taxation’, Australian Economic Review 43(4): 347–356.Google Scholar

George, H. (1879), Progress and Poverty, Raleigh, NC: Lulu Press.Google Scholar

Hamilton, K. and Clemens, M. (1999), ‘Genuine savings rates in developing countries’, World Bank Economic Review 13(2): 333–356.Google Scholar

Hartwick, J.M. (1977), ‘Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources’, American Economic Review 67(5): 972–974.Google Scholar

Hughes, G., Chinowsky, P., and Strzepek, K. (2010), ‘The costs of adaptation to climate change for water infrastructure in OECD countries’, Utilities Policy 18(3): 142–153.Google Scholar

IEA (2014), ‘World Energy Investment Outlook’, Special Report, Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar

Jakob, M., Chen, C., Fuss, S., Marxen, A., Rao, N.D., and Edenhofer, O. (2016), ‘Carbon pricing revenues could close infrastructure access gaps’, World Development 84: 254–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohli, H.A. and Basil, P. (2011), ‘Requirements for infrastructure investment in Latin America under alternate growth scenarios: 2011–2040’, Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies 3(1): 59–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markandya, A., González-Eguino, M., and Escapa, M. (2013), ‘From shadow to green: linking environmental fiscal reforms and the informal economy’, Energy Economics 40(Suppl. 1): S108–S118.Google Scholar

Mattauch, L., Siegmeier, J., Edenhofer, O., and Creutzig, F. (2013), ‘Financing public capital through land rent taxation: a macroeconomic Henry George theorem’, Working Paper No. 4280, Munich: CESifo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mintz, J. and Chen, D. (2012), ‘Capturing economic rents from resources through royalties and taxes’, University of Calgary SPP Research Paper 30(5).Google Scholar

Neumayer, E. (2010), Weak Versus Strong Sustainability (3rd edn), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pachauri, S., van Ruijven, B.J., Nagai, Y., Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D.P., Brew-Hammond, A., and Nakicenovic, N. (2013), ‘Pathways to achieve universal household access to modern energy by 2030’, Environmental Research Letters 8(2): 024015.Google Scholar

Pogge, T.W. (2007), World Poverty and Human Rights (2nd edn), Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Ross, M. (2001), ‘Does oil hinder democracy?’, World Politics 53(3): 325–361.Google Scholar

Rothman, D.S., Irfan, M.T., Hughes, B.B., Margolese-Malin, E., and Moyer, J.D. (2014), Building Global Infrastructure, Patterns of Potential Human Progress series, Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar

Sclen, H. and Kallbekken, S. (2011), ‘A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway’, Ecological Economics 70(11): 2181–2190.Google Scholar

Segal, P. (2010), ‘Resource rents, redistribution, and halving global poverty: the resource dividend’, World Development 39(4): 475–489.Google Scholar

Sen, A. (1992), Inequality Re-Examined, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Sen, A. (1999), Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

van der Ploeg, F. (2011), ‘Natural resources: curse or blessing?’, Journal of Economic Literature 49(2): 366–420.Google Scholar

van Ruijven, B.J., Schers, J., and van Vuuren, D.P. (2012), ‘Model-based scenarios for rural electrification in developing countries’, Energy 38(1): 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wick, K. and Bulte, E. (2009), ‘The curse of natural resources’, Annual Review of Resource Economics 1(1): 139–156.Google Scholar