Local versus organic: A turn in consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay | Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Demand for local food in the US has significantly increased over the past decade. In an attempt to understand the drivers of this demand and how they have changed over time, we investigate the literature on organic and local foods over the past few decades. We focus our review on studies that allow comparison of characteristics now associated with both local and organic food. We summarize the major findings of these studies and their implications for understanding drivers of local food demand. Prior to the late 1990s, most studies failed to consider factors now associated with local food, and the few that included these factors found very little support for them. In many cases, the lines between local and organic were blurred. Coincident with the development of federal organic food standards, studies began to find comparatively more support for local food as distinct and separate from organic food. Our review uncovers a distinct turn in the demand for local and organic food. Before the federal organic standards, organic food was linked to small farms, animal welfare, deep sustainability, community support and many other factors that are not associated with most organic foods today. Based on our review, we argue that demand for local food arose largely in response to corporate co-optation of the organic food market and the arrival of ‘organic lite’. This important shift in consumer preferences away from organic and toward local food has broad implications for the environment and society. If these patterns of consumer preferences prove to be sustainable, producers, activists and others should be aware of the implications that these trends have for the food system at large.

References

1Pollan, M. 2006. The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. Penguin, New York, NY.. British Food Journal 107(4/5):320–343.CrossRef. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 1:83–88.CrossRef. Journal of Food Distribution Research 36(1):192–201.. Journal of Food Distribution Research 29:91–98.. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29(8):43–53.CrossRef. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18:213–224.CrossRef. Journal of Food Distribution Research 35(3):1–5.. Journal of Applied Communications 80(3):10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

78Nichol, L. 2003. Local food production: Some implications for planning. Planning Theory and Practice 4(4):409–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

80Horovitz, B. 2009. Frito-Lay pitches its Lay's Potato Chips as locally made. USA Today, 12 May.Google Scholar

81Gambrell, J. 2008. Wal-Mart stores stocking more locally grown produce: It's a way to cut transport costs and reassure customers. The San Diego Union-Tribune, 7 July.Google Scholar

82Norton, F. 2008. Wal-Mart Expo ‘A lot like dating’: World's top retailer dangles a chance for local food vendors to sell to its stores. The News and Observer, 17 April.Google Scholar

83Bodini, A. and Naspetti, S. 2008. Consumer perception of local and organic products: substitution or complementary goods? International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 3(2):111–122.Google Scholar

84Hughner, R.S., McDonagh, P., Prothero, A., Schultz, C.J., and Stanton, J. 2007. Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 6:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar