High frequencies of antibiotic resistance genes in infants’ meconium and early fecal samples | Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)
Abstract
The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) microbiota has been identified as an important reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) that can be horizontally transferred to pathogenic species. Maternal GIT microbes can be transmitted to the offspring, and recent work indicates that such transfer starts before birth. We have used culture-independent genetic screenings to explore whether ARGs are already present in the meconium accumulated in the GIT during fetal life and in feces of 1-week-old infants. We have analyzed resistance to β-lactam antibiotics (BLr) and tetracycline (Tcr), screening for a variety of genes conferring each. To evaluate whether ARGs could have been inherited by maternal transmission, we have screened perinatal fecal samples of the 1-week-old babies’ mothers, as well as a mother–infant series including meconium, fecal samples collected through the infant’s 1st year, maternal fecal samples and colostrum. Our results reveal a high prevalence of BLr and Tcr in both meconium and early fecal samples, implying that the GIT resistance reservoir starts to accumulate even before birth. We show that ARGs present in the mother may reach the meconium and colostrum and establish in the infant GIT, but also that some ARGs were likely acquired from other sources. Alarmingly, we identified in both meconium and 1-week-olds’ samples a particularly elevated prevalence of mecA (>45%), six-fold higher than that detected in the mothers. The mecA gene confers BLr to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and although its detection does not imply the presence of this pathogen, it does implicate the young infant’s GIT as a noteworthy reservoir of this gene.
References
Salyers, AA, Gupta, A, Wang, Y. Human intestinal bacteria as reservoirs for antibiotic resistance genes. Trends Microbiol. 2004; 12, 412–416.Google Scholar
Seville, LA, Patterson, AJ, Scott, KP, et al. Distribution of tetracycline and erythromycin resistance genes among human oral and fecal metagenomic DNA. Microb Drug Resist. 2009; 15, 159–166.Google Scholar
Sommer, MO, Dantas, G, Church, GM. Functional characterization of the antibiotic resistance reservoir in the human microflora. Science. 2009; 325, 1128–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, AM, Patel, S, Forsberg, KJ, et al. Pediatric fecal microbiota harbor diverse and novel antibiotic resistance genes. PLoS One. 2013; 8, e78822.Google Scholar
Fouhy, F, Ogilvie, LA, Jones, BV, et al. Identification of aminoglycoside and beta-lactam resistance genes from within an infant gut functional metagenomic library. PLoS One. 2014; 9, e108016.Google Scholar
Lu, N, Hu, Y, Zhu, L, et al. DNA microarray analysis reveals that antibiotic resistance-gene diversity in human gut microbiota is age related. Sci Rep. 2014; 4, 4302.Google Scholar
Hu, Y, Yang, X, Lu, N, Zhu, B. The abundance of antibiotic resistance genes in human guts has correlation to the consumption of antibiotics in animal. Gut Microbes. 2014; 5, 245–249.Google Scholar
Gueimonde, M, Salminen, S, Isolauri, E. Presence of specific antibiotic (tet) resistance genes in infant faecal microbiota. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2006; 48, 21–25.Google Scholar
Mitsou, EK, Kirtzalidou, E, Pramateftaki, P, Kyriacou, A. Antibiotic resistance in faecal microbiota of greek healthy infants. Benef Microbes. 2010; 1, 297–306.Google Scholar
de Vries, LE, Valles, Y, Agerso, Y, et al. The gut as reservoir of antibiotic resistance: microbial diversity of tetracycline resistance in mother and infant. PLoS One. 2011; 6, e21644.Google Scholar
Zhang, L, Kinkelaar, D, Huang, Y, et al.. Acquired antibiotic resistance: are we born with it? Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77, 7134–7141.Google Scholar
Alicea-Serrano, AM, Contreras, M, Magris, M, Hidalgo, G, Dominguez-Bello, MG. Tetracycline resistance genes acquired at birth. Arch Microbiol. 2013; 195, 447–451.Google Scholar
Collado, MC, Isolauri, E, Laitinen, K, Salminen, S. Distinct composition of gut microbiota during pregnancy in overweight and normal-weight women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008; 88, 894–899.Google Scholar
Gilbert, SF. A holobiont birth narrative: the epigenetic transmission of the human microbiome. Front Genet. 2014; 5, 282.Google Scholar
Koren, O, Goodrich, JK, Cullender, TC, et al. Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell. 2012; 150, 470–480.Google Scholar
Berg, R. Bacterial translocation from the gastrintestinal tract. Trends Microbiol. 1995; 3, 149–154.Google Scholar
Cani, PD, Delzenne, NM. The gut microbiome as therapeutic target. Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 130, 202–212.Google Scholar
Francino, MP. Early development of the gut microbiota and immune health. Pathogens. 2014; 3, 769–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosalbes, MJ, Llop, S, Valles, Y, et al. Meconium microbiota types dominated by lactic acid or enteric bacteria are differentially associated with maternal eczema and respiratory problems in infants. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013; 43, 198–211.Google Scholar
Valles, Y, Artacho, A, Pascual-Garcia, A, et al. Microbial succession in the gut: directional trends of taxonomic and functional change in a birth cohort of Spanish infants. PLoS Genet. 2014; 10, e1004406.Google Scholar
Perez, PF, Dore, J, Leclerc, M, et al.. Bacterial imprinting of the neonatal immune system: lessons from maternal cells? Pediatrics. 2007; 119, e724–e732.Google Scholar
Donnet-Hughes, A, Perez, PF, Dore, J, et al. Potential role of the intestinal microbiota of the mother in neonatal immune education. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010; 69, 407–415.Google Scholar
Amar, J, Chabo, C, Waget, A, et al. Intestinal mucosal adherence and translocation of commensal bacteria at the early onset of type 2 diabetes: molecular mechanisms and probiotic treatment. EMBO Mol Med. 2011; 3, 559–572.Google Scholar
McGovern, N, Chan, JK, Ginhoux, F. Dendritic cells in humans – from fetus to adult. Int Immunol. 2015; 27, 65–72.Google Scholar
DiGiulio, DB, Romero, R, Amogan, HP, et al. Microbial prevalence, diversity and abundance in amniotic fluid during preterm labor: a molecular and culture-based investigation. PLoS One. 2008; 3, e3056.Google Scholar
DiGiulio, DB, Romero, R, Kusanovic, JP, et al. Prevalence and diversity of microbes in the amniotic fluid, the fetal inflammatory response, and pregnancy outcome in women with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010; 64, 38–57.Google Scholar
Dong, Y, St Clair, PJ, Ramzy, I, Kagan-Hallet, KS, Gibbs, RS. A microbiologic and clinical study of placental inflammation at term. Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 70, 175–182.Google Scholar
Lewis, JF, Johnson, P, Miller, P. Evaluation of amniotic fluid for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Pathol. 1976; 65, 58–63.Google Scholar
Gibbs, RS, Blanco, JD, St Clair, PJ, Castaneda, YS. Quantitative bacteriology of amniotic fluid from women with clinical intraamniotic infection at term. J Infect Dis. 1982; 145, 1–8.Google Scholar
Romero, R, Mazor, M, Morrotti, R, et al. Infection and labor. Vii. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in spontaneous rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 166, 129–133.Google Scholar
Romero, R, Sirtori, M, Oyarzun, E, et al. Infection and labor. V. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 161, 817–824.Google Scholar
Bearfield, C, Davenport, ES, Sivapathasundaram, V, Allaker, RP. Possible association between amniotic fluid micro-organism infection and microflora in the mouth. BJOG. 2002; 109, 527–533.Google Scholar
Steel, JH, Malatos, S, Kennea, N, et al.. Bacteria and inflammatory cells in fetal membranes do not always cause preterm labor. Pediatr Res. 2005; 57, 404–411.Google Scholar
Jimenez, E, Fernandez, L, Marin, ML, et al.. Isolation of commensal bacteria from umbilical cord blood of healthy neonates born by cesarean section. Curr Microbiol. 2005; 51, 270–274.Google Scholar
Roos, PJ, Malan, AF, Woods, DL, et al. The bacteriological environment of preterm infants. S Afr Med J. 1980; 57, 347–350.Google Scholar
Stout, MJ, Conlon, B, Landeau, M, et al. Identification of intracellular bacteria in the basal plate of the human placenta in term and preterm gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208, 226 e221–226 e227.Google Scholar
Aagaard, K, Ma, J, Antony, KM, et al. The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci Transl Med 2014; 6, 237ra265.Google Scholar
Jimenez, E, Marin, ML, Martin, R, et al. Is meconium from healthy newborns actually sterile? Res Microbiol. 2008; 159, 187–193.Google Scholar
Koenig, JE, Spor, A, Scalfone, N, et al. Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(Suppl. 1), 4578–4585.Google Scholar
Moles, L, Gomez, M, Heilig, H, et al. Bacterial diversity in meconium of preterm neonates and evolution of their fecal microbiota during the first month of life. PLoS One. 2013; 8, e66986.Google Scholar
Dominguez-Bello, MG, Costello, EK, Contreras, M, et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107, 11971–11975.Google Scholar
Hu, J, Nomura, Y, Bashir, A, et al. Diversified microbiota of meconium is affected by maternal diabetes status. PLoS One. 2013; 8, e78257.Google Scholar
Madan, JC, Salari, RC, Saxena, D, et al. Gut microbial colonisation in premature neonates predicts neonatal sepsis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012; 97, F456–F462.Google Scholar
Mshvildadze, M, Neu, J, Shuster, J, et al. Intestinal microbial ecology in premature infants assessed with non-culture-based techniques. J Pediatr. 2010; 156, 20–25.Google Scholar
Valles, Y, Gosalbes, MJ, de Vries, LE, Abellan, JJ, Francino, MP. Metagenomics and development of the gut microbiota in infants. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012; 18(Suppl. 4), 21–26.Google Scholar
Cabrera-Rubio, R, Collado, MC, Laitinen, K, et al. The human milk microbiome changes over lactation and is shaped by maternal weight and mode of delivery. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 96, 544–551.Google Scholar
Nichols, DA, Renslo, AR, Chen, Y. Fragment-based inhibitor discovery against beta-lactamase. Fut Med Chem. 2014; 6, 413–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowy, FD. Antimicrobial resistance: the example of Staphylococcus aureus . J Clin Invest. 2003; 111, 1265–1273.Google Scholar
Kazimierczak, KA, Scott, KP, Kelly, D, Aminov, RI. Tetracycline resistome of the organic pig gut. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75, 1717–1722.Google Scholar
Ribas-Fito, N, Ramon, R, Ballester, F, et al. Child health and the environment: the INMA Spanish Study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006; 20, 403–410.Google Scholar
Ng, LK, Martin, I, Alfa, M, Mulvey, M. Multiplex pcr for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes. Mol Cell Probes. 2001; 15, 209–215.Google Scholar
Clemente, JC, Pehrsson, EC, Blaser, MJ, et al. The microbiome of uncontacted amerindians. Sci Adv. 2015; 1, e1500183.Google Scholar
Agerso, Y, Aarestrup, FM, Pedersen, K, et al. Prevalence of extended-spectrum cephalosporinase (esc)-producing Escherichia coli in danish slaughter pigs and retail meat identified by selective enrichment and association with cephalosporin usage. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012; 67, 582–588.Google Scholar
Poirel, L, Walsh, TR, Cuvillier, V, Nordmann, P. Multiplex pcr for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011; 70, 119–123.Google Scholar
Mendes, RE, Kiyota, KA, Monteiro, J, et al. Rapid detection and identification of metallo-β-lactamase-encoding genes by multiplex real-time PCR assay and melt curve analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45, 544–547.Google Scholar
Poulsen, AB, Skov, R, Pallesen, LV. Detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci and in staphylococci directly from simulated blood cultures using the evigene mrsa detection kit. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003; 51, 419–421.Google Scholar