A latent variable approach to measuring and explaining peace agreement strength | Political Science Research and Methods | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Much of the peace agreement durability literature assumes that stronger peace agreements are more likely to survive the trials of the post-conflict environment. This work does an excellent job identifying which provisions indicate that agreements are more likely to endure. However, there is no widely accepted way to directly measure the strength of agreements, and existing measures suffer from a lack of nuance or reliance on subjective weighting. We use a Bayesian item response theory model to develop a principled measure of the latent strength of peace agreements in civil conflicts from 1975 to 2005. We illustrate the measure's utility by exploring how various international factors such as sanctions and mediation contribute to the strength or weakness of agreements.

References

Alesina, A and Dollar, D (2000) Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? Journal of Economic Growth 5, 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arbetman, M and Kugler, J (1997) Political Capacity and Economic Behavior. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D, Bakker, R, Carroll, R, Hare, C, Poole, KT and Rosenthal, H (2014) Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Badran, R (2014) Intrastate peace agreements and the durability of peace. Conflict Management and Peace Science 31, 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bafumi, J, Gelman, A, Park, DK and Kaplan, N (2005) Practical issues in implementing and understanding Bayesian ideal point estimation. Political Analysis 13, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, R, Hill, DW and Moore, WH (2016) How much terror? Dissidents, governments, institutions, and the cross-national study of terror attacks. Journal of Peace Research 53, 711–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bearce, DH and Tirone, DC (2010) Foreign aid effectiveness and the strategic goals of donor governments. The Journal of Politics 72, 837–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beardsley, K (2008) Agreement without peace? International mediation and time inconsistency problems. American Journal of Political Science 52, 723–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beardsley, KC, Quinn, DM, Biswas, B and Wilkenfeld, J (2006) Mediation style and crisis outcomes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50, 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benson, BV and Clinton, JD (2016) Assessing the variation of formal military alliances. Journal of Conflict Resolution 60, 866–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böhmelt, T (2012) Why many cooks if they can spoil the broth? The determinants of multiparty mediation. Journal of Peace Research 49, 701–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, R and Kenkel, B (Forthcoming) Prediction, proxies, and power. American Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar

Cunningham, DE (2006) Veto players and civil war duration. American Journal of Political Science 50, 875–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeRouen, K and Bercovitch, J (2012) Trends in civil war mediation. In Hewitt, JJ, Wilkenfeld, J, Gurr, TR and Heldt, B (eds), Peace and Conflict 2012. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar

DeRouen, K, Bercovitch, J and Pospieszna, P (2011) Introducing the Civil Wars Mediation (CWM) dataset. Journal of Peace Research 48, 663–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreher, A, Sturm, J-E and Vreeland, JR (2009) Development aid and international politics: does membership on the UN security council influence World Bank decisions? Journal of Development Economics 88, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dür, A, Baccini, L and Elsig, M (2014) The design of international trade agreements: introducing a new dataset. The Review of International Organizations 9, 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fariss, CJ (2014) Respect for human rights has improved over time: modeling the changing standard of accountability. American Political Science Review 108, 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortna, VP (2003) Scraps of paper? Agreements and the durability of peace. International Organization 57, 337–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gartner, SS (2011) Signs of trouble: regional organization mediation and civil war agreement durability. The Journal of Politics 73, 380–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gartner, SS and Bercovitch, J (2006) Overcoming obstacles to peace: the contribution of mediation to short-lived conflict settlements. International Studies Quarterly 50, 819–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleditsch, NP, Wallensteen, P, Eriksson, M, Sollenberg, M and Strand, H (2002) Armed conflict 1946–2001: a new dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39, 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, J and Slapin, JB (2012) How effective are preferential trade agreements? Ask the experts. The Review of International Organizations 7, 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greig, JM (2005) Stepping into the fray: when do mediators mediate? American Journal of Political Science 49, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harbom, L, Högbladh, S and Wallensteen, P (2006) Armed conflict and peace agreements. Journal of Peace Research 43, 617–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartzell, CA (1999) Explaining the stability of negotiated settlements to intrastate wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartzell, C and Hoddie, M (2003) Institutionalizing peace: power sharing and post-civil war conflict management. American Journal of Political Science 47, 318–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartzell, C, Hoddie, M and Rothchild, D (2001) Stabilizing the peace after civil war: an investigation of some key variables. International Organization 55, 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joshi, M and Darby, J (2013) Introducing the Peace Accords Matrix (PAM): a database of comprehensive peace agreements and their implementation, 1989–2007. Peacebuilding 1, 256–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joshi, M, Quinn, JM and Regan, PM (2015) Annualized implementation data on comprehensive intrastate peace accords, 1989–2012. Journal of Peace Research 52, 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kadera, KM (1998) Transmission, barriers, and constraints: a dynamic model of the spread of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42, 367–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kugler, J and Tammen, RL (2012) The Performance of Nations. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Little, R and Rubin, DB (2002) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd Edn. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, MG, Gurr, TR and Jaggers, K (2014) POLITY IV PROJECT: Dataset Users' Manual. Codebook, Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar

Morgan, TC, Bapat, N and Kobayashi, Y (2014) Threat and imposition of economic sanctions 1945–2005: updating the TIES dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science 31, 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, TC, Bapat, N and Krustev, V (2009) The threat and imposition of economic sanctions, 1971–2000*. Conflict Management and Peace Science 26, 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, M and Pearson, FS (2002) Civil war characteristics, mediators, and resolution. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 19, 421–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pemstein, D, Meserve, SA and Melton, J (2010) Democratic compromise: a latent variable analysis of ten measures of regime type. Political Analysis 18, 426–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pickering, J and Kisangani, EF (2009) The international military intervention dataset: an updated resource for conflict scholars. Journal of Peace Research 46, 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rasch, G (1980) Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. OCLC: 6278633.Google Scholar

Regan, PM (2002) Third-party interventions and the duration of intrastate conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46, 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reid, L (2017) Finding a peace that lasts: mediator leverage and the durable resolution of civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61, 1401–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schnakenberg, KE and Fariss, CJ (2014) Dynamic patterns of human rights practices. Political Science Research and Methods 2, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, BC and Spaniel, W (2018) Introducing _ν_-Clear: a latent variable approach to measuring nuclear proficiency. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 0738894217741619.Google Scholar

Svensson, I (2009) Who brings which peace? Neutral versus biased mediation and institutional peace arrangements in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53, 446–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Themnér, L and Wallensteen, P (2014) Armed conflicts, 1946–2013. Journal of Peace Research 51, 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Touval, S and Zartman, IW (1985) Introduction: mediation in theory. In Touval, S and Zartman, IW (eds), International Mediation in Theory and Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Treier, S and Jackman, S (2008) Democracy as a latent variable. American Journal of Political Science 52, 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wehr, P and Lederach, JP (1991) Mediating conflict in central America. Journal of Peace Research 28, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werner, S and Yuen, A (2005) Making and keeping peace. International Organization 59, 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

World Bank (2018) World development indicators 2018. Technical report, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar