Further Experiments in the Etiology of Dengue Fever | Epidemiology & Infection | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present figures show that the virus may be present in the blood as early as 18 hours and as late as 90 hours after the onset. It was not found in the blood 130 hours and 190 hours after the onset.

The virus outside the body has been found alive, if kept reasonably cool, in several instances up to 48 hours, and in one instance after 99 hours.

It is not possible from this series to draw deductions from the negative cases on this question.

Several mosquito experiments in this series have not therefore added to our previous knowledge, but the one satisfactory experiment with Culex fatigans tends to support the view we hold that this species is probably not a vector of the disease. The results previously published by us support the opinion of Bancroft (5) and show clearly that, whether or not C. fatigans may also play a part in Australia, Stegomyia fasciata is capable of spreading the infection of dengu.

Type

Research Article

Copyright

Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1919

References

(1)Cleland, , Bradley, and MacDonald, (2. IX. 1916). On the Transmission of Australian Dengue by the Mosquito Stegomyia fasciata. Med. Journ. of Australia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(2)Cleland, , Bradley, and MacDonald, (5. II. 1918). Dengue Fever in Australia. Journ. of Hyg. xvi. 317–418, 9 charts; also in Seventh Report of the Microbiological Laboratory of the Dept. of Public Health, N.S.W..Google Scholar

(3)Graham, (1. VII. 1903). The Dengue; A Study of its Pathology and Model of Propagation. Journ. of Trop. Med. vi. p. 209.Google Scholar

(4)Ashburn, and Craig, (1907). Experimental investigations regarding the Aetiology of Dengue Fever. Philipp. Journ. of. Sc. ii. 93.Google Scholar

(5)Bancroft, (1. 1906). On the Aetiology of Dengue Fever. Aust. Med. Gaz. p. 17.Google Scholar