Indigenous market-oriented agroforestry: dissecting local diversity in western Amazonia (original) (raw)

Abstract

This paper reports on a study of local diversity and variation in indigenous agroforestry practices among Amazonian peasants in a traditional community near Iquitos, Peru. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews with agroforestry-reliant households n = 36) on farming practices, demographic characteristics, income-expenditures and household wealth. Visits to crop fields and forest fallows n = 329) allowed the reconstruction of extensive cropping histories. More in-depth assessments of crop occurrence, density and diversity were conducted on 83 fields. Our results indicate considerable variation in field characteristics, agroforestry-cycles, and household agroforestry portfolios. Agroforestry practice is found to be strongly related to access to land within the community: households holding more land use both potentially more sustainable and more lucrative swidden-fallow agroforestry systems. Our results question the view of indigenous agroforestry systems as intrinsically ‘stable, equitable, and sustainable’, and underscore the importance of studying local variation in indigenous agroforestry practices. Promising avenues are discussed for future research on the factors related to the successful adoption of sustainable agroforestry systems.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, PQ, Canada, H3A 2K6
    O. T. Coomes & G. J. Burt

Authors

  1. O. T. Coomes
  2. G. J. Burt

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coomes, O.T., Burt, G.J. Indigenous market-oriented agroforestry: dissecting local diversity in western Amazonia.Agroforestry Systems 37, 27–44 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005834816188

Download citation