Consensus and direct democracy:Conceptual and empirical linkages (original) (raw)
- Armingeon, K. & Freitag, M. (1997). Deutschland Österreich Schweiz: Die politischen Systeme im Vergleich. Ein sozialwissenschaftliches Datenhandbuch. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Google Scholar - Barber, B.R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Google Scholar - Barry, B. (1974). The consociational model and its dangers, European Journal of Political Research 3(4): 393–412.
Google Scholar - Barry, B. (1975). Review article: Political accomodation and consociational democracy, British Journal of Political Science 5(4): 477–505.
Google Scholar - Bassand, M. (1988). Les enjeux de l'urbanisation. Bern and Paris: Lang.
Google Scholar - Bogdanor, V. (1994). Western Europe. In: D. Butler & A. Ranney (eds), The referendums around the world: The growing use of direct democracy. Basingstoke: MacMillan Press.
Google Scholar - Bohn, D.E. (1981). Consociationalism and accomodation in Switzerland, Journal of Politics 43: 1236–1240.
Google Scholar - Budge, I. (1996). The new challenge of direct democracy. Oxford: Polity Press.
Google Scholar - Butler, D. & Ranney, A. (1994). The referendums around the world: The growing use of direct democracy. Basingstoke: MacMillan Press.
Google Scholar - Caciagli, M. & Uleri, P.V. (1994). Democrazie e referendum, Roma and Bari: Laterza.
Google Scholar - Church, C. (1989). Behind the consociational screen: politics in contemporary Switzerland, West European Politics 12: 35–54.
Google Scholar - Cronin, T.E. (1989). Direct democracy: The politics of initiative, referendum, and recall. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar - Daalder, H. (1974). The consociational democracy theme, World Politics 26: 604–621.
Google Scholar - Elazar, D.J. (1997). Exploring Federalism. Lexington: Raytheon.
Google Scholar - Felder, U. (1993). Wahl aller Kantonsregierungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Wahlsystems. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag.
Google Scholar - Gallagher, M. & Uleri, P.V. (1996). The referendum experience in Europe. London and New York: MacMillan Press.
Google Scholar - Germann, R.E. (1975). Politische Innovation und Verfassungsreform. Bern: Haupt.
Google Scholar - Germann, R.E. (1991). Die Europatauglichkeit der direktdemokratischen Institutionen der Schweiz, Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für Politische Wissenschaft 31: 257–269.
Google Scholar - Grote, R. (1996). Direkte Demokratie in den Staaten der Europäischen Union, Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis 3: 317–363.
Google Scholar - Hamon, F. (1995). Le référendum. Etude comparative. Paris: Economica.
Google Scholar - Hug, S. (1996). Referendums around the world: Why do they occur? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
- Jung, S. (1996). Lijpharts Demokratietypen und die direkte Demokratie, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 6(3): 623–647.
Google Scholar - Keman, H. & Pennings, P. (1995). Managing political and social conflict in democracies: Do consensus or corporatism matter?, British Journal of Political Science 25: 271–281.
Google Scholar - Kobach, K.W. (1993). The referendum: Direct democracy in Switzerland. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Google Scholar - Kriesi, H. (1990). Federalism and pillarization: The Netherlands and Switzerland compared, Acta Politica 25: 433–450.
Google Scholar - Kriesi, H. (1995). Le système politique suisse. Paris: Economica.
Google Scholar - Kriesi, H. & Wisler, D. (1996). Social movements and direct democracy, European Journal of Political Research 30: 19–40.
Google Scholar - Ladner, A. & Brändle, M. (1999). Does direct democracy matter for political parties? An empirical test in the swiss cantons. Party Politics 5(3): 283–302.
Google Scholar - Lane, J.-E. & Ersson, S. (1997). The institutions of Konkordanz and corporatism: How closely are they connected? Swiss Political Science Review 3(1): 21–42.
Google Scholar - Lehmbruch, G. (1967). Proporzdemokratie. Politisches System und politische Kultur in der Schweiz und in Österreich. Tübingen: Mohr.
Google Scholar - Lehmbruch, G. (1969). Konkordanzdemokratie im internationalen Vergleich, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 1: 139–163.
Google Scholar - Lehmbruch, G. (1975). Consociational democracy in the international system, European Journal of Political Research 3: 377–391.
Google Scholar - Lehner, F. (1984). Consociational democracy in Switzerland: political-economic explanation and some empirical evidence, European Journal of Political Research 12: 25–45.
Google Scholar - Lijphart, A. (1968). The politics of accomodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Google Scholar - Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in plural societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar - Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies. Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar - Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies 1945-1990. Oxford and New York: University Press.
Google Scholar - Lijphart, A. (1996). The puzzle of Indian democracy: a consociational interpretation, American Political Science Review 90(2): 258–268.
Google Scholar - Lijphart, A. (1997a). About peripheries, centres and other autobiographical reflections, pp. 241–253, in: H. Daalder (ed.), Comparative European politics. The story of a profession. London: Redwood Books.
Google Scholar - Lijphart, A. (1997b). Reflections: Dimensions of democracy, European Journal of Political Research 31(1-2): 195–204.
Google Scholar - Lijphart, A. & Crepaz, M.M.L. (1991). Corporatism and consensus democracy in 18 countries: Conceptual and empirical linkages, British Journal of Political Science 21: 235–256.
Google Scholar - Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar - Linder, W. (1994). Swiss democracy. Possible solutions to conflict in multicultural societies. London and New York: MacMillan Press.
Google Scholar - Linder, W. (1999). Schweizerische Demokratie. Institutionen - Prozesse - Perspektiven. Bern und Stuttgart: Haupt.
Google Scholar - Luthardt, W. (1994). Direkte Demokratie. Ein Vergleich in Westeuropa. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Google Scholar - Lutz, G. & Strohmann, D. (1998). Wahl-und Abstimmungsrecht in den Kantonen. Bern: Haupt.
Google Scholar - Magleby, D.B. (1984). Direct legislation. Voting on ballot propositions in the United States. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar - Magleby, D.B. (1994). Direct legislation in the American States, pp. 218-263, in: D. Butler & A. Ranney (eds), The referendums around the world. The growing use of direct democracy. Basingstoke: MacMillan Press.
Google Scholar - Matsusaka, J.G. (1992). Economics of direct legislation, Quarterly Journal of Economics 17(3): 541–571.
Google Scholar - McRae, K.D. (1974). Consociational democracy: Political accomodation in segmented societies. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
Google Scholar - Möckli, S. (1994). Direkte Demokratie. Ein internationaler Vergleich. Bern: Haupt.
Google Scholar - Morel, L. (1992). Le référendum: état des recherches, Revue française de science politique 42(5): 134–164.
Google Scholar - Nef, R. (1980). Struktur, Kultur und Abstimmungsverhalten. Zur interregionalen Variation von politischen Präferenzen in der Schweiz 1950-1977, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 10: 155–190.
Google Scholar - Neidhart, L. (1970). Plebiszit und pluralitäre Demokratie. Eine Analyse der Funktion des schweizerischen Gesetzesreferendums. Bern: Lang.
Google Scholar - Nohlen, D. (1990). Wahlrecht und Parteiensystem: über die politischen Auswirkungen von Wahlsystemen. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Google Scholar - Papadopoulos, Y. (1994). Elites politiques et peuple en Suisse: analyse des votations fédérales 1970-1987. Lausanne: Editions Réalités Sociales.
Google Scholar - Papadopoulos, Y. (1997). Les processus de décision fédéraux en Suisse. Paris: L'Harmattan.
Google Scholar - Papadopoulos, Y. (1998). Démocratie directe. Paris: Economica.
Google Scholar - Pedersen, M. (1979). The dynamics of European party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility, European Journal of Political Research 7: 1–26.
Google Scholar - Pouvoirs (1996). Le référendum, Revue française d'études constitutionelles et politiques 77.
- Powell, B. (1982). Contemporary democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar - Price, C.M. (1975). The initiative: A comparative state analysis and a reassessment of a western phenomenon, Western Political Quarterly 28: 243–262.
Google Scholar - Rourke, J.T., Hiskes, R.P. & Zirakzadeh, C.E. (1992). Direct democracy and international politics. Deciding international issues through referendums. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Google Scholar - Sartori, G. (1992). Demokratietheorie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Google Scholar - Scharpf, F.W. (1970). Demokratietheorie zwischen Utopie und Anpassung. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.
Google Scholar - Sciarini, P. & Hug, S. (1999). The odd fellow: Parties and consociationalism in Switzerland, pp. 134–162, in: K.R. Luther & K. Deschouwer (eds), Party elites in divided societies. London and New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar - Schmidt, M.G. (1995). Demokratietheorien. Eine Einführung. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Google Scholar - Schneider, F. (1985). Der Einfluss von Interessengruppen auf die Wirtschaftspolitik. Eine empirische Untersuchung für die Schweiz. Bern and Stuttgart: Haupt.
Google Scholar - Smith, G. (1976). The functional properties of the referendum, European Journal of Political Research 4(1): 1–25.
Google Scholar - Steiner, J. (1974). Amicable agreement versus majority rule: Conflict resolution in Switzerland. Chapel Hill: UNC Press.
Google Scholar - Steiner, J. (1998). The consociational theory and Switzerland - revisited thirty years later. Paper presented at the conference on the fate of consociationalism. Harvard University.
- Suksi, M. (1993). Bringing in the people. A comparison of constitutional forms and practices of the referendum. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Google Scholar - Taagepera, R. (1989). Empirical thresholds of representation, Electoral Studies 8: 105–116.
Google Scholar - Trechsel, A.H. & Kriesi, H. (1996). Switzerland: The referendum and initiative as a centrepiece of the political system, pp. 185–207, in: M. Gallagher & P.V. Uleri (eds), The referendum experience in Europe. London and New York: MacMillan Press.
Google Scholar - Trechsel, A.H. & Sciarini, P. (1998). Direct democracy in Switzerland: Do elites matter?, European Journal of Political Research 33(1): 99–24.
Google Scholar - Vatter, A. & Nabholz, R. (1995). Der Stimmbürger als Homo Economicus? Ein empirischer Theorientest am Beispiel kantonaler Kreditvorlagen aus der Schweiz, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 36(3): 484–501.
Google Scholar - Vatter, A. & Sager, F. (1996). Föderalismusreform am Beispiel des Ständemehrs, Swiss Political Science Review 2(2): 165–200.
Google Scholar - Vatter, A., Linder, W. & Farago, P. (1997). Determinanten politischer Kultur am Beispiel des Schwyzer Stimmverhaltens, Swiss Political Science Review 3(1): 1–33.
Google Scholar - Vatter, A. (1997). Die Wechselbeziehungen von Konkordanz-und Direktdemokratie, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 38(4): 743–770.
Google Scholar