An Examination of State Medicaid Financing Arrangements for Early Childhood Development Services (original) (raw)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the extent to which Medicaid finances early childhood development services, either on a capitated or fee-for-service basis, and to gauge future interest in financing such services. Methods: We analyzed state Medicaid managed care contracts in effect in April 1998 in 45 states using capitated arrangements for children at the end of 1997 to ascertain whether state Medicaid agencies financed any of six types of early childhood development services, including parent counseling, home visiting, comprehensive assessments, telephone advice lines, parent education classes, and case management. We also conducted structured telephone surveys with the same 45 states' Medicaid managed care directors. Results: Overall, state Medicaid agencies finance few early childhood development services on a capitated or fee-for-service basis. Case management was the most popular service to be paid for fee-for-service. Parent education was the most popular service required in managed care contracts. Parent counseling and telephone advice lines for information on child development or parenting issues were the services least likely to be reimbursed through either Medicaid financing mechanism. Conclusion: To date, Medicaid agencies generally have not required managed care plans to cover early childhood development services, nor have they paid for such services on a fee-for-service basis. However, 17 states expressed an interest in expanding early childhood development services, particularly home visiting, parent education, and telephone advice lines. Nonetheless, several challenges exist in expanding Medicaid financing, including the need for more evidence on cost-effectiveness and greater political support for promoting early childhood development.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Chugani HT. Biological basis of emotions: Brain systems and brain development. Pediatrics 1998;102:1225–29.
    Google Scholar
  2. Chugani HT. A critical period of brain development: Studies of cerebral glucose utilization with PET. Prevent Med 1998; 27:184–88.
    Google Scholar
  3. Duncan GJ, Brooks-Gunn J, Klebanov PK. Economic deprivation and early childhood development. Child Dev 1994;65: 296–318.
    Google Scholar
  4. Parker S, Greer S, Zuckerman B. Double jeopardy: The impact of poverty on early childhood development. Pediatric Clin North Am 1988;35:1227–40.
    Google Scholar
  5. Newacheck P. Poverty and childhood chronic illness. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994;148:1143–49.
    Google Scholar
  6. Wise P, Mayers A. Poverty and child health. Pediatric Clin North Am 1998;35:1169–86.
    Google Scholar
  7. Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan GJ. The effects of poverty on children. Future Child 1997;7:55–71.
    Google Scholar
  8. Aber JL, et al. The effects of poverty on child health and development. Annu Rev Public Health 1997;18:463–83.
    Google Scholar
  9. Young K, et al. Listening to parents. A national survey of parents with young children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998; 152:255–62.
    Google Scholar
  10. Green M, editor. Bright futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1994.
    Google Scholar
  11. Gomby DS, Culross PL, Behrman RE. Home visiting: Recent program evaluations—Analysis and recommendations. Future Child (to appear).
  12. Yudowsky BK, Tang SS, Murphy SC. State Medicaid reports_—_FY 1996. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 1998.
    Google Scholar
  13. Newacheck P, et al. The effect of curtailing Medicaid spending. JAMA 1995;274:1468–71.
    Google Scholar
  14. Fox HB, et al. An analysis of states' CHIP policies affecting children with special health care needs. Washington, DC: Maternal and Child Health Policy Research Center, 1999.
    Google Scholar
  15. Health Care Financing Administration. Children's Health Insurance Program reaches 1998 target, press release, 1999.
  16. Fox HB, McManus MA, Almeida R. The impact of managed care on Medicaid financing for early intervention services. Washington, DC: Maternal and Child Health Policy Research Center, 1998.
    Google Scholar
  17. Bobroff R, McManus MA, Fox HB. Summary of interviews with selected state Title V agency directors regarding developmental support services for families with young children. Washington, DC: Maternal and Child Health Policy Research Center, 1998.
    Google Scholar
  18. Kaplan-Sanoff M, Brown T, Zuckerman B. Enhancing pediatric primary care for low-income children: Cost lessons learned from Pediatric Pathways to Success. Zero to Three, the Bulletin 1997;June/July:34–37.
  19. Olds D, et al. Long-term effects of nurse home visitation on children's criminal and antisocial behavior. JAMA 1998;280: 1238–44.
    Google Scholar
  20. Gomby DS, Culross PL, Behrman RE. Home visiting: recent program evaluations—Analysis and recommendations. Future Child (to appear).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fox Health Policy Consultants, Washington, D.C.
    Harriette B. Fox & Stephanie J. Limb
  2. McManus Health Policy, Inc., Washington, D.C.
    Margaret A. McManus

Authors

  1. Harriette B. Fox
  2. Margaret A. McManus
  3. Stephanie J. Limb

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fox, H.B., McManus, M.A. & Limb, S.J. An Examination of State Medicaid Financing Arrangements for Early Childhood Development Services.Matern Child Health J 4, 19–27 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009526801520

Download citation