Stories Remote Sensing Images Can Tell: Integrating Remote Sensing Analysis with Ethnographic Research in the Study of Cultural Landscapes (original) (raw)
References
Al-Ibrahim, A. A. (1991). Excessive use of groundwater resources in Saudi Arabia: Impacts and policy options. Ambio 20(1): 34-37. Google Scholar
Behrens, C. A., Baksh, M. G., and Mothes, M. (1994). A regional analysis of Bari land use intensification and its impact on landscape heterogeneity. Human Ecology 22(3): 279-316. Google Scholar
Bollig, M., and Schulte, A. (1999). Environmental change and pastoral perceptions: Degradation and indigenous knowledge in two African pastoral communities. Human EcoZogy 27(3): 493-514. Google Scholar
Brondizio, E. S., Moran, E. F., Mausel, M., and Wu, Y. (1994). Land use change in the Amazon estuary: Patterns of Caboclo settlement and landscape management. Human Ecology 22(3): 249-277. Google Scholar
Brosius, J. P. (1997). Endangered forest, endangered people: Environmentalist representations of indigenous knowledge. Human Ecology 25(1): 47-69. Google Scholar
Brush, S. B. (1993). Indigenous knowledge of biological resources and intellectual property rights: The role of anthropology. American Anthropologist 95(3): 653-686. Google Scholar
Casimir, M. J., and Rao, A. (1998). Sustainable herd management and the tragedy of no man's land: An analysis of west Himalayan pastures using remote sensing techniques. Human Ecology 26(1): 113-134. Google Scholar
Chandler, P. (1994). Adaptive ecology of traditionally derived agroforestry in China. Human Ecology 22(4): 415-442. Google Scholar
Chandrakanth, M.G., and Romm, J. (1990). Groundwater depletion in India: Institutional management regimes. Natural Resources Journal 30(3): 485-501. Google Scholar
Conant, F. P. (1994). Human ecology and space age technology: Some predictions. Human Ecology 22(3): 405-413. Google Scholar
Dahlberg, A. C. (2000). Landscape(s) in transition: An environmental history of a village in north-east Botswana. Journal of Southern African Studies 26(4): 759-782. Google Scholar
Eastman, J. R. (1997). IDRISI for Windows User's Guide, Clark Labs, Clark University, Worcester, MA. Google Scholar
Estes, J. E., Jensen, J. R., and Simonett, D.S. (1980). Impacts of remote sensing on U.S. geography. Remote Sensing of Environment 10: 43-80. Google Scholar
Forsyth, T. (1996). Science, myth and knowledge: Testing Himalayan environmental degradation in Thailand. Geoforzzm 27(3): 375-392. Google Scholar
Guer, J. I., and Lambin, E.F. (1993). Land use in an urban hinterland: Ethnography and remote sensing in the study of African intensification. American Anthropologist 95(4): 839-859. Google Scholar
Haenn, N. (1999). The power of environmental knowledge: Ethnoecology and environmental conflicts in Mexican conservation. Human Ecology 27(3): 477-491. Google Scholar
Hoeschele, W. (2000). Geographic information engineering and social ground truth in Attappadi, Kerala State, India. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90(2): 293-321. Google Scholar
Jiang, H. (2002). Culture, ecology, and nature's changing balance: Sandification on Mu Us Sandy Land, Inner Mongolia, China. In Reynolds, J. F., and Smith, M. S. (eds.), Global Desertification: Do Humans Cause Desert? Berlin: Dahlem University Press, pp. 181-196. Google Scholar
Jiang, H. (submitted). Cooperation, land use, and the environment in Uxin Ju: A changing landscape of a Mongolian–Chinese borderland in China. Annals of AAG.
Johnson, A. (1989). How the Machiguenga manage resources: Conservation or exploitation of nature? In Posey, D. A., and Balee, W. (eds.), Resource Management in Amazonia: Indigenous and Folk Strategies, The New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp. 213-222. Google Scholar
Kromm, D. E., and White, S. E. (1983). Response to groundwater depletion in southwestern Kansas. Environmental Professional 5(1): 106-115. Google Scholar
Kromm, D. E., and White, S. E. (1984). Adjustment preferences to groundwater depletion in the American High Plains (Ogallala). Geoforum 15(2): 271-284. Google Scholar
Kwan, M.-P. (2002). Quantitative methods and feminist geographic research. In Moss, P. (ed.), Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 160-173. Google Scholar
Ley, D. (1981). Cultural/humanistic geography. Progress in Human Geography 5(2): 249-257. Google Scholar
Ley, D., and Samuels, M. (1978). Methodological implications. In Ley, D., and Samuels, M. (eds.), Humanistic Geography Prospects and Problems, Croom Helm, London, pp. 121-122. Google Scholar
Lillesand, T. M., and Kiefer, R. W. (1994). Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google Scholar
McCracken, S. D., Brondizio, E. S., Nelson, D., Moran, E. F., Siqueira, A. D., and Rodriguez-Pedraza, C. (1999). Remote sensing and GIS at farm property level: Demography and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing (11): 1311-1320.
McLafferty, S. (1995). Counting for women. Professional Geographer 47(4): 436-442. Google Scholar
Micklin, P. P. (1996). Man and the water cycle: Challenges for the 21st century. GeoJournal 39(3): 285-298. Google Scholar
Millette, T. L., Tuladhar, A. R., Kasperson, R. E., Turner, B. L. II, (1995). The use and limits of remote sensing for analysing environmental and social change in the Himalayan Middle Mountains of Nepal. Global Environment Change 5(4): 367-380. Google Scholar
Moran, E. F., and Brondizio, E. (1998). Land-use change after deforestation in Amazonia. In Liverman, D., Moran, E. F., Rindfuss, R. R., and Stern, P. C. (eds.), People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 94-120. Google Scholar
Philip, L. J. (1998). Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to social research in human geography—an impossible mixture? Environment and Planning A 30(2): 261-276. Google Scholar
Philo, C., Mitchell, R., and More, A. (1998). Reconsidering quantitative geography: The things that count. Environment and Planning A 30(1): 191-201. Google Scholar
Posey, D. A. (1993). Indigenous knowledge in the conservation and use of world forests. In Ramakrishna, K., and Woodwell, G. M. (eds.), World Forests for the Future: Their Use and Conservation, Yale University Press, Binghamton, pp. 59-77. Google Scholar
Pratt, G. (1989). Quantitative techniques and humanistic–historical materialist perspectives. In Kobayashi, A., and Mackenzie, S. (eds.), Remaking Human Geography, Unwin Hyman, Boston, pp. 101-115. Google Scholar
Rasmussen, M. S., James, R., Adiyasuren, T., Khishigsuren, T. P., Narachimeg, B., Gankhuyag, R., and Baasanjargal, B. (1999). Supporting Mongolian pastoralists by using GIS to identify grazing limitations and opportunities from livestock census and remote sensing data. GeoJournal 47: 563-571. Google Scholar
Richards, P. (1985). Indigenous Agricultural Revolution: Ecology and Food Production in West Africa, Hutchinson, London. Google Scholar
Robbins, P., and Maddock, T. (2000). Interrogating land cover categories: metaphor and method in remote sensing. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 27(4): 295-309. Google Scholar
Rocheleau, D. (1995). Maps, numbers, text, and context: Mixing methods in feminist political ecology. Professional Geographer 47(4): 458-466. Google Scholar
Sader, S. A., Sever, T., Smoot, J. C., and Richards, M. (1994). Forest change estimates for the Northern Peten region of Guatemala—1986–1990. Human Ecology 22(3): 317-332. Google Scholar
Sillitoe, P. (1998). What, know natives? Local knowledge in development. Social Anthropology 6(2): 203-220. Google Scholar
Sussman, R. W., Green, G. M., and Sussman, L. K. (1994). Satellite imagery, human ecology, anthropology, and deforestation in Madagascar. Human Ecology 22(3): 333-354. Google Scholar
Thompson, M. (1989). Commentary: From myths as falsehood to myths as repositories of experience and wisdom. Mountain Research and Development 9: 182-186. Google Scholar
Wilkie, D. S. (1994). Remote sensing imagev for resource inventories in Central Africa: The importance of detailed field data. Human Ecology 22: 379-403. Google Scholar