A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Health Care Institutions (original) (raw)
REFERENCES
Alexander, J.A., et al. (1999) Do market-level hospital and physician resources affect small area variation in hospital use? Medical Care Research & Review56, 94-117. Google Scholar
Bear, R., et al. (1998) The Last Critical Care Bed in Western Canada. Healthcare Management Forum11(4).
Black, N., & Donald, A. (2001) Evidence based policy: proceed with care. British Medical Journal323, 275-9. Google Scholar
Blundell, R., & Windmeijer, F. (2000) Identifying demand for health resources using waiting times information. Health Economics9, 465-74. Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1994) Pluralism and Proceduralism, Chicago-Kent Law Review69, 589-618. Google Scholar
Daniels, N., & Sabin, J.E. (2002) Setting Limits Fairly: Can we learn to share medical resources? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Daniels, N. (2000) Accountability for reasonableness. British Medical Journal321, 1300-1301. Google Scholar
Daniels, N., Sabin, J.E. (1997) Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for Insurers. Philosophy and Public Affairs26(4), 303-502. Google Scholar
Deber, R., et al. (1994) Technology Acquisition in Canadian Hospitals: How is it done, and where is the information coming from? Healthcare Management FORUM7(4), 18-27. Google Scholar
Eland, I.A., et al. (1998) [Provision of taxoids in 1996: inequality of care] [Dutch]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde142, 518-21. Google Scholar
Foy, R., et al. (1999) Perspectives of commissioners and cancer specialists in prioritising new cancer drugs: impact of the evidence threshold. British Medical Journal318, 456-459. Google Scholar
Ham, C. (1993) Priority setting in the NHS: Reports from six districts. British Medical Journal307, 435-8. Google Scholar
Ham, C., et al. (1995) Evidence based policymaking. British Medical Journal310, 71-2. Google Scholar
Ham, C. (1999) Tragic choices in health care: Lessons from the Child B case. British Medical Journal319, 1258-61. Google Scholar
Ham, C., & McIver, S. (2000) Contested Decisions: Priority setting in the NHS. London, UK: King's Fund Publishing. Google Scholar
Ham, C., & Coulter, A. (2001) Explicit and implicit rationing: taking responsibility and avoiding blame for health care choices. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy6, 163-9. Google Scholar
Holm, S. (1998) Goodbye to the simple solutions: The second phase of priority setting in health care. British Medical Journal317, 1000-7. Google Scholar
Hope, T., et al. (1998) Rationing and the health authority. British Medical Journal317, 1067-1069. Google Scholar
Hurley, J., et al. (1995) Geographically-decentralized planning and management in health care: Some informational issues and their implications for efficiency. Social Science & Medicine41, 3-11. Google Scholar
Kahn, R.L. (1993) The MacArthur Foundation Program in Mental Health and Human Development: An Experiment in Scientific Organization. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation. Google Scholar
Klein, R. (1998) Puzzling out priorities. British Medical Journal317, 959-60. Google Scholar
Kleinman, A. Ethics and experience: An anthropological approach to health equity. Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies Working Paper Series 99.04 (March 1999), page 6.
Kovac, M. (1998) Rationing of hospital services in the Australian health system. Croatian Medical Journal39, 339-45. Google Scholar
LeCompte, M.D., et al. (1999) Researcher Roles & Research Partnerships. London: AltaMira Press. Google Scholar
Martin, D.K., & Singer, P.A. (2000) Priority Setting and Health Technology Assessment: Beyond Evidence Based Medicine and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. In C. Ham, A. Coulter (Eds.), The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing (pp. 135-45). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Google Scholar
Martin, D.K., et al. (2001) Priority Setting Decisions for New Cancer Drugs: A Qualitative Study. Lancet358, 1676-81. Google Scholar
Martin, D.K., & Singer, P.A. Priority setting for health technologies in Canada. In C. Ham and G. Roberts (Eds.), Priority setting in health care. Institutions, information and accountability for reasonableness. London, UK: King's Fund Publications, in press.
Martin, D.K., et al. (in press O'Riordan, T.) Priority Setting and Hospital Strategic Planning: A Qualitative Case Study. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy.
McKneally, M.F., et al. (1997) Bioethics for Clinicians: Resource Allocation. Canadian Medical Association Journal157, 163-7. Google Scholar
Norheim, O. (2000) “Procedures for Priority Setting and Mechanisms of Appeal in the Norwegian Health Care System.” Presentation at the 3rdInternational Conference on Priorities In Health. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
Rosenfield, P.L. (1992) The potential transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between health and social sciences. Social Science & Medicine11, 1342-57. Google Scholar
Singer, P.A., & Mapa, J. (1998) Ethics of Resource Allocation: Dimensions for Healthcare Executives. Hospital Quarterly1(4):29-31. Google Scholar
Singer, PA., et al. (2000) Priority Setting for New Technologies in Medicine: A Qualitative Case Study. British Medical Journal321, 1316-8. Google Scholar
Taylor, V.M., et al. (1998) Hospitalizations for back and neck problems: A comparison between the Province of Ontario and Washington State. Health Services Research33(4 Pt 1): 929-45. Google Scholar
Willliams, J.R., et al. (1996) Ethics for regional boards. Leadership in Health Services5, 22-6. Google Scholar
Williams, J.R., & Yeo, M. (2000) The Ethics of Decentralizing Health Care Priority Setting in Canada. In C. Ham and A. Coulter (Eds.), The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing. (pp. 123-32). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Google Scholar
Yin, R.K. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Google Scholar