Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (original) (raw)
Abstract
Empirical evidence presented in this paper shows that the utmost care must be taken ininterpreting bibliometric data in a comparative evaluation of national research systems. From theresults of recent studies, the authors conclude that the value of impact indicators of researchactivities at the level of an institution or a country strongly depend upon whether one includes orexcludes research publications in SCI covered journals written in other languages than in English.Additional material was gathered to show the distribution of SCI papers among publicationlanguages. Finally, the authors make suggestions for further research on how to deal with this typeof problems in future national research performance studies.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
References
- R. M. May, The scientific wealth of nations, Science, 275 (Feb 7) (1997) 793-796.
- E. Garfield, English–An international language for science, The Information Scientist, Dec 76, In: Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 1, pp. 19-20, ISI Press.
- T. N. van Leeuwen, H. F. Moed, R. J. W. Tijssen, M. S. Visser, A. F. J. van Raan, First Evidence of serious language-bias in the use of citation analysis for the evaluation of national science systems, Research Evaluation, Vol. 9, August 2000, 155-156.
- H. F. Moed, R. E. de Bruin, Th. N. Van Leeuwen, New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications, Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 381-422.
Google Scholar - A. F. J. van Raan, Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 397-420.
Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Centre for Science & Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, Leiden, (The Netherlands)
Thed N. Van Leeuwen, Henk F. Moed, Robert J. W. Tijssen, Martijn S. Visser & Anthony F. J. Van Raan
Authors
- Thed N. Van Leeuwen
- Henk F. Moed
- Robert J. W. Tijssen
- Martijn S. Visser
- Anthony F. J. Van Raan
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Leeuwen, T.N., Moed, H.F., Tijssen, R.J.W. et al. Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance.Scientometrics 51, 335–346 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010549719484
- Issue date: April 2001
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010549719484