The False Consensus Effect Disappears if Representative Information and Monetary Incentives Are Given | Experimental Economics | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

We present an experiment on the false consensus effect. Unlike previous experiments, we provide monetary incentives for revealing the actual estimation of others’ behavior. In each session and round, sixteen subjects make a choice between two options simultaneously. Then they estimate the choices of a randomly selected subgroup. For half of the rounds we provide information about other subjects’ choices. There we find no false consensus effect. At an aggregate level, subjects significantly underweight rather than overweight their choices. When we do not provide information, the presence of a false consensus effect cannot be detected.

References

Abbink, K. and Sadrieh, A. (1995). “RatImage—Research Assistance Toolbox for Computer-Aided Human Behavior Experiments.” Discussion Paper No. B-325, University of Bonn.Google Scholar

Alicke, M.D. and Largo, E. (1995). “The Role of the Self in the False Consensus Effect.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 31, 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. (1996). “Rules for Experimenting in Psychology and Economics, and Why They Differ.” In Albers, W. et al. (eds.), Understanding Strategic Interaction—Essays in Honor of Reinhard Selten. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Dawes, R.M. (1989). “Statistical Criteria for Establishing a Truly False Consensus Effect.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 25, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawes, R.M. (1990). “The Potential Nonfalsity of the False Consensus Effect.” In Hogarth, R.M. (ed.), Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Engelmann, D. (2000). Trust and Trustworthiness—Theoretical Explanations and Experimental Evidence. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U., and Sedlmeier, P. (in press). “Cognitive Illusions Reconsidered.” In Plott, C.R. and Smith, V.L. (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. North-Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, E. and Sadrieh, A. (1996). “Experimental Proof for the Motivational Importance of Reciprocity.” Discussion Paper No. B-386, University of Bonn.Google Scholar

Krueger, J. and Clement, R.W. (1994). “The Truly False Consensus Effect: An Ineradicable and Egocentric Bias in Social Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 67, 596–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mullen, B., Atkins, J.L., Champion, D.S., Edwards, C., Hardy, D., Story, J.E., and Venderklok, M. (1985). “The False Consensus Effect: A Meta-Analysis of115 Hypothesis Tests.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 21, 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Offerman, T., Sonnemans, J., and Schram, A. (1996). “Value Orientations, Expectations and Voluntary Contributions in Public Goods.” The Economic Journal. 106, 817–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, L., Greene, D., and House, P. (1977). “The ‘False Consensus Effect’: An Egocentric Bias in Social Perception and Attribution Processes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 13, 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selten, R. and Ockenfels, A. (1998). “An Experimental Solidarity Game.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 34, 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sherman, S.J., Presson, C.C., and Chassin, L. (1984). “Mechanisms Underlying the False Consensus Effect: The Special Role of Threats to the Self.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 10, 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar