Effect Sizes in Qualitative Research: A Prolegomenon (original) (raw)
- Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A Psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.
Google Scholar - Allport, G. W. (1962). The general and the unique in psychological science. Journal of Personality 30: 405–422.
Google Scholar - Allport, G. W. (1966). Traits revisited. American Psychologist 21: 1–10.
Google Scholar - American Educational Research Association. (2000). American Educational Research Association 2001 Annual Meeting Call for Proposals. Educational Researcher 29(4): 27–41.
Google Scholar - Berg, B.L. (1989). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Google Scholar - Bernstein, I. H. & Teng, G. (1989). Factoring items and factoring scales are different: Spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization. Psychological Bulletin 105: 467–477.
Google Scholar - Block, J. (1957). A comparison between ipsative and normative ratings of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 54: 50–54.
Google Scholar - Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: John Wiley.
Google Scholar - Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In: R. Vaile & M. King (eds.), Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 48–71.
Google Scholar - Daniel, L. G. (1998a). Statistical significance testing: A historical overview of misuse and misinterpretation with implications for editorial policies of educational journals. Research in the Schools 5: 23–32.
Google Scholar - Daniel, L. G. (1998b). The statistical significance controversy is definitely not over: A rejoinder to responses by Thompson, Knapp, and Levin. Research in the Schools 5: 63–65.
Google Scholar - Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Google Scholar - Goetz, J. P. & Lecompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and the Qualitative Design in Educational Research. New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar - Hetzel, R. D. (1996). A primer on factor analysis with comments on patterns of practice and reporting.In: B. Thompson (ed.), Advances in Social Science Methodology (Vol 4). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 175–206.
Google Scholar - Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar - Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar - Newman, I. & Benz, C. R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring the Interactive Continuum. Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.
Google Scholar - Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2000a, November). Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Educational Research (AAER), Ponte Vedra, Florida.
- Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2000b). On Becoming a Bi-researcher: The Importance of Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methodologies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Educational Research (AAER), Ponte Vedra, Florida.
- Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (in press-a). Common analytical and interpretational errors in educational research. Educational Research Quarterly.
- Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (in press-b). Expanding the framework of internal and external validity in quantitative research. Research in the Schools.
- Onwuegbuzie, A. J.,& Daniel, L.G. (2002). Uses and misuses of the correlation coefficient. Research in the Schools 9: 73–90.
Google Scholar - Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Daniel, L. G. (in press). Typology of analytical and interpretational errors in quantitative and qualitative educational research. Current Issues in Education.
- Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Teddlie, C. (2002). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 351–383.
Google Scholar - Sechrest, L. & Sidana, S. (1995). Quantitative and qualitative methods: Is there an alternative? Evaluation and Program Planning 18: 77–87.
Google Scholar - Stephenson, W. (1953). The Study of Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar - Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar - Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (in press). Issues and dilemmas in teaching research methods courses in social and behavioral sciences: A U.S. perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology.
- Thompson, B. (1998a). Five methodological errors in educational research: The pantheon of statistical significance and other faux pas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
- Thompson, B. (1998b). Statistical testing and effect size reporting: Portrait of a possible future. Research in the Schools 5: 33–38.
Google Scholar - Thompson, B. (1999). Common methodology mistakes in educational research, revisited, along with a primer on both effect sizes and the bootstrap. Invited address presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal [On-line]. Available: http://acs.tamu.edu/ bbt6147/aeraad99.htm
- Thompson, B. & Daniel, L. G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement 56: 197–208.
Google Scholar - Wilkinson, L. & the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist 54: 594–604.
Google Scholar - Witcher, A., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Minor, L. (2001). Characteristics of effective teachers: Perceptions of preservice teachers. Research in the Schools 8: 45–57.
Google Scholar