Syntactic Working Memory and the Establishment of Filler-Gap Dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI (original) (raw)
REFERENCES
- Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multi-component model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar - Bader, M., & Lasser, I. (1994). German verb-final clauses and sentence processing: Evidence for immediate attachment. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Advances in sentence processing (pp. 225–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar - Caplan, D., Alpert, D., & Waters, G. (1998). Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 541–552.
PubMed Google Scholar - Caplan, D., Alpert, D., Waters, G., & Olivieri, A. (2000). Activation of Broca's area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation. Human Brain Mapping, 9, 65–71.
PubMed Google Scholar - Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77–126.
PubMed Google Scholar - Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1989). Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 273–317). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Google Scholar - Crocker, M. W. (1994). On the nature of the principle-based sentence processor. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier & K. Rayner (Eds.), Advances in sentence processing (pp. 245–266). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar - Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.
Google Scholar - De Vincenzi, M. (1991). Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Google Scholar - Duvernoy, H. (1991). The human brain.Wien: Springer.
Google Scholar - Fanselow, G., Kliegl, R., & Schlesewsky, M. (1999). Processing difficulty and principles of grammar. In S. Kemper & R. Kliegl (Eds.), Constraints on language (pp. 171–201). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Google Scholar - Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (submitted, a). An ERP investigation of syntactic working memory during the processing of German WH-questions.
- Fiebach, C. J., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (submitted, b). Syntactic complexity revisited: An event-related fMRI study of syntactic working memory.
- Ford, M. (1983). A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 203–218.
Google Scholar - Frazier, L., & Flores D'Arcais, G. B. (1989). Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 331–344.
Google Scholar - Friederici, A. D. (1998). The neurobiology of language processing. In A. D. Friederici (Ed.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective (pp. 263–301). Berlin: Springer.
Google Scholar - Friederici, A. D., & Frazier, L. (1992). Thematic analysis in agrammatic comprehension: Syntactic structures and task demands. Brain and Language, 42, 1–29.
PubMed Google Scholar - Friederici, A. D., & Gorrell, P. (1998). Structural prominence and agrammatic theta-role assignment: A reconsideration of linear strategies. Brain and Language, 65, 253–275.
PubMed Google Scholar - Friederici, A. D., & Graetz, P. (1987). Processing passive sentences in aphasia: Deficits and strategies. Brain and Language, 30, 93–105.
PubMed Google Scholar - Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1219–1248.
Google Scholar - Friederici, A. D., Meyer, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Auditory language comprehension: An event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain and Language, 74, 289–300.
Google Scholar - Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., Mecklinger, A., & Meyer, M. (1998). Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biological Psychology, 47, 193–221.
PubMed Google Scholar - Frisch, S., Saddy, D., & Friederici, A. D. (2000). Cutting a long story (too) short. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 34–35.
Google Scholar - Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76.
PubMed Google Scholar - Gorrell, P. (1993). Evaluating the direct association hypothesis: A reply to Pickering and Barry. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 129–146.
Google Scholar - Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1–21.
PubMed Google Scholar - Grossman, M. (2000). Neural basis for sentence processing: fMRI studies of healthy adults and patients with frontotemporal dementia. Paper presented at the 13th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, La Jolla, California.
- Hagiwara, H., & Caplan, D. (1990). Syntactic comprehension in Japanese aphasics: Effects of category and thematic order. Brain and Language, 38, 159–170.
PubMed Google Scholar - Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 194–205.
PubMed Google Scholar - Heeschen, C. (1980). Strategies of decoding actor-object-relations by aphasic patients. Cortex, 16, 5–19.
PubMed Google Scholar - Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.
PubMed Google Scholar - Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Keller, T. A., Eddy, W. F., & Thulborn, K. R. (1996). Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science, 274, 114–116.
PubMed Google Scholar - Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 159–201.
Google Scholar - King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580–602.
Google Scholar - King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word-and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376–395.
Google Scholar - Kluender, R., Münte, T., Cowles, H. W., Szentkuti, A., Walenski, M., & Wieringa, B. (1998). Brain potentials to English and German questions. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society.
- Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis of event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 23, 477–494.
Google Scholar - Muckel, S., & Pechmann, T. (2000). Does the parser search for traces? Poster presented at the 13th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, La Jolla, California.
- Müller, R.-A. (2000). A big “housing” problem and a trace of neuroimaging: Broca's area is more than a transformation center. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 42.
Google Scholar - Neville, H., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151–165.
Google Scholar - Nicol, J. L., Fodor, J. D., & Swinney, D. (1994). Using cross-modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1229–1238.
Google Scholar - Nicol, J. L., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–19.
PubMed Google Scholar - Orrison, W. W., Lewine, J. D., Sanders, J. A., & Hartshorne, M. F. (1995). Functional brain imaging. St. Louis: Mosby.
Google Scholar - Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. (1983). The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature (London), 368, 342–345.
Google Scholar - Pickering, M. J. (2000). No evidence for traces in sentence comprehension (Commentary). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 47–48.
Google Scholar - Pickering, M. J., & Barry, G. (1991). Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 229–259.
Google Scholar - Rösler, F., Pütz, P., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 345–362.
Google Scholar - Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson Jr., R., Canoune, H., & Ritter, W. (1990). Short-term memory storage and retention: An event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 76, 419–439.
PubMed Google Scholar - Smith, E. E., Jonides, J., & Koeppe, R. (1996). Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 11–20.
PubMed Google Scholar - Stowe, L. A. (2000). Sentence comprehension and the left inferior frontal gyrus: Storage, not computation (Commentary). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 51.
Google Scholar - Stowe, L. A., Broere, C. A. J., Paans, A. M. J., Wijers, A. A., Mulder, G., Vaalburg, W., & Zwarts, F. (1998). Localizing components of complex task: Sentence processing and working memory. Neuroreport, 9, 2995–2999.
PubMed Google Scholar - Stromswold, K., Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Rauch, S. (1996). Localization of syntactic comprehension by Positron Emmission Tomography. Brain and Language, 52, 452–473.
PubMed Google Scholar