Random errors in the measurement of 10 cardiovascular risk factors (original) (raw)

Abstract

Random errors in the measurement of 10 commonly investigated cardiovascular risk factors (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, blood cholesterol, blood glucose, pulse rate, body mass index (BMI), cigarette consumption, passive smoking, alcohol intake and physical exercise) were assessed in a general population cohort (n = 2517) and a workforce cohort (n = 8008). Random errors were estimated from regression dilution ratios (lower ratios imply greater random error, and a ratio of one implies no random error). All of the risk factors, except for BMI (which had regression dilution ratios of 0.93 and 0.98 in the two cohorts), were measured with substantial levels of random error. Particularly low regression dilution ratios were observed for physical exercise (0.28 and 0.39) and pulse rate (0.47 and 0.56). For each of these risk factors, with the possible exception of BMI, associations with long-term average values could be importantly biased toward the null unless appropriate corrections are made.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part I, prolonged di.erences in blood pressure: Prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet 1990; 335: 765–774.
    Google Scholar
  2. Law MR, Wald NJ, Wu T, Hackshaw A, Bailey A. Systematic underestimation of association between serum cholesterol concentration and ischaemic heart disease in observational studies: Data from the BUPA study. BMJ 1994; 308: 363–366.
    Google Scholar
  3. Knuiman MW, Divitini ML, Buzas JS, Fitzgerald PEB. Adjustment for regression dilution in epidemiological regression analyses. Ann Epidemiol 1998; 8: 56–63.
    Google Scholar
  4. MacMahon S, Norton R, Jackson R, et al. Fletcher Challenge-University of Auckland Heart & Health Study: Design and baseline findings. NZ Med J 1995; 108: 499–502.
    Google Scholar
  5. Clarke R, Shipley M, Lewington S, et al. Underestimation of risk associations due to regression dilution in long-term follow-up of prospective studies. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150: 341–353.
    Google Scholar
  6. Bashir SA, Duffy SW. Correction of risk estimates for measurement error in epidemiology. Meth Inform Medicine 1995; 34: 503–510.
    Google Scholar
  7. Carroll RJ, Stefanski LA. Measurement error, instrumental variables and corrections for attenuation with applications to meta-analyses. Stat Med 1994; 13: 1265–1282.
    Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Auckland, New Zealand
    G. Whitlock, T. Clark, S. Vander Hoorn & A. Rodgers
  2. Department of Community Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand
    R. Jackson
  3. Institute for International Health, University of Sydney, Australia
    R. Norton & S. MacMahon

Authors

  1. G. Whitlock
  2. T. Clark
  3. S. Vander Hoorn
  4. A. Rodgers
  5. R. Jackson
  6. R. Norton
  7. S. MacMahon

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitlock, G., Clark, T., Vander Hoorn, S. et al. Random errors in the measurement of 10 cardiovascular risk factors.Eur J Epidemiol 17, 907–909 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016228410194

Download citation