Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA (original) (raw)
- Correspondence
- Published: October 1999
- Iwona Kubacka2,
- Patrick F. Chinnery3,
- Robert N. Lightowlers3,
- Douglass M. Turnbull3 &
- …
- Neil Howell2
Nature Genetics volume 23, page 147 (1999)Cite this article
- 20k Accesses
- 2616 Citations
- 43 Altmetric
- Metrics details
The Human Genome Project, from one perspective, began in 1981 with the publication1 of the complete sequence of human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). The Cambridge reference sequence (CRS), as it is now designated, continues to be indispensable for studies of human evolution, population genetics and mitochondrial diseases. It has been recognized for some time, however, that the CRS differs at several sites from the mtDNA sequences obtained by other investigators2,3. These discrepancies may reflect either true errors in the original sequencing analysis or rare polymorphisms in the CRS mtDNA. A further complication is that the original mtDNA sequence was principally derived from a single individual of European descent, although it also contained some sequences from both HeLa and bovine mtDNA (ref. 1). To resolve these uncertainties, we have completely resequenced the original placental mtDNA sample.
The results of the resequencing confirm that there are both errors and rare polymorphisms in the CRS (Table 1). There are 11 nucleotide positions at which the original sequence contains the incorrect nucleotide (all sequences here refer to that of the CRS mtDNA L-strand), one of which involves the CC doublet at positions 3,106 and 3,107 in the original sequence, which is actually a single cytosine residue. The other errors are mistakes in the identification of single base pairs and typically involve the incorrect assignment of a guanine residue. Errors at nt 14,272 and 14,365 result from the use of the bovine mtDNA sequence at ambiguous sites1. There are an additional seven nucleotide positions at which the original CRS is correct and which represent rare (or even private) polymorphic alleles. Six of these polymorphisms are single base pair substitutions, although one involves the simple repeat of cytosine residues at nt 311–315. The CRS has five residues in this repeat, whereas most other human mtDNAs have six.
Table 1 Reanalysis of the Cambridge reference sequence
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
References
- Anderson, S. et al. Nature 290, 457–465 (1981).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Brown, M.D. et al. Genetics 130, 163–173 (1992).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar - Howell, N., McCullough, D.A., Kubacka, I., Halvorson, S. & Mackey, D. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 50, 1333–1337 (1992).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar - Torroni, A. et al. Genetics 144, 1835–1850 (1996).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar - Lamminen, T. et al. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 5, 271–279 (1997).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Torroni, A. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 1137–1152 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Howell, N. & McCullough, D.A. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 47, 629–634 (1990).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar - Howell, N. et al. Genetics 140, 285–302 (1995).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar - Biggin, M.D., Gibson, J.J. & Hong, G.F. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 3963–3965 (1983).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Coulson and F. Sanger for their generous donation of the original placental mtDNA sample. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (R.M.A. and D.M.T.), Wellcome Trust (D.M.T., P.F.C., R.N.L. and N.H.) and the John Sealy Memorial Endowment Fund (N.H.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Neurology, The Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
Richard M. Andrews - Biology Division 0656, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, 77555-0656, Texas, USA
Iwona Kubacka & Neil Howell - Department of Neurology, The Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
Patrick F. Chinnery, Robert N. Lightowlers & Douglass M. Turnbull
Authors
- Richard M. Andrews
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Iwona Kubacka
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Patrick F. Chinnery
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Robert N. Lightowlers
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Douglass M. Turnbull
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Neil Howell
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toDouglass M. Turnbull.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andrews, R., Kubacka, I., Chinnery, P. et al. Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA.Nat Genet 23, 147 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/13779
- Issue Date: October 1999
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/13779