We are what we ate (original) (raw)

Human evolution

Nature volume 400, pages 219–220 (1999) Cite this article

Much of evolutionary history involves the fine-tuning of variations on a common theme. But every now and again significant innovations (known as grade shifts) occur, forming the basis for the next phase of evolutionary activity. Evidence of such a grade shift in human evolution can be found in the fossil record of a little less than two million years (Myr) ago. Here we see the first signs of hominins (human ancestors from the tribe Hominini) whose bodies, jaws and teeth begin to resemble those of modern humans. Writing in the Journal of Human Evolution, O'Connell and colleagues1 now challenge conventional wisdom by suggesting that the cascade of changes — involving anatomy, life history, culture and social structure — that resulted in the evolution of modern humans was set off not by hunting, but by systematic exploitation of subterranean food sources and recruitment of grandmothers to provide for their grandchildren.

The most primitive hominin known, the 4.5-Myr-old Ardipithecus ramidus3, has relatively few derived hominin features. It is probably just one of a number of early hominins with different combinations and degrees of emphasis on ‘human’ features such as thickened enamel, upright posture and skeletal adaptations to a more terrestrial locomotion. After A. ramidus, but before 2 Myr ago, all species of hominin are megadont (that is, they have larger chewing teeth) compared with living modern humans and chimpanzees. But they differ in absolute and relative brain size, in the degree of megadonty, and in the extent to which the post-cranial skeleton shows adaptations to an upright posture and bipedalism4. There are probably undiscovered hominin species with different combinations of these adaptations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 52 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.83 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Species considered to be part of the tribe Hominini, or hominins, as opposed to chimpanzee ancestors, or panins.

References

  1. O'Connell, J. F. et al. J. Hum. Evol. 36, 461–485 (1999).
    Google Scholar
  2. Ruvolo, M. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 26, 515–540 (1997).
    Google Scholar
  3. White, T. D. et al. Nature 371, 306–312 (1994).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  4. Leakey, M. G. et al. Nature 376, 565–571 (1995).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  5. Asfaw, B. et al. Science 284, 629–635 (1999).
    Google Scholar
  6. Wood, B. A. et al. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 95, 117–136 (1994).
    Google Scholar
  7. Susman, R. L. et al. Folia Primatologia 43, 113–156 (1984).
    Google Scholar
  8. Wood, B. A. & Collard, M. Science 284, 65–71 (1999).
    Google Scholar
  9. Wood, B. A. Nature 355, 783–790 (1992).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  10. Semaw, S. et al. Nature 385, 333–336 (1997).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  11. Hawkes, K. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1336–1339 (1998).
    Google Scholar
  12. Charnov, E. L. Life History Invariants: Some Explorations of Symmetry in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, 1993).
  13. Aiello, L. C. & Wheeler, P. Curr. Anthropol. 36, 199–221 (1995).
    Google Scholar
  14. Wood, B. & Collard, M. in African Biogeography, Climate Change and Early Hominid Evolution (eds Bromage, T. & Schrenk, F.) 316 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1999).
  15. Wrangham, R. W. et al. Curr. Anthropol. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, George Washington University, DC 20052, Washington, USA
    Bernard Wood & Alison Brooks

Authors

  1. Bernard Wood
  2. Alison Brooks

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wood, B., Brooks, A. We are what we ate.Nature 400, 219–220 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/22227

Download citation