Chimaeras and Cell Lineage in Development (original) (raw)

Nature volume 239, pages 276–279 (1972)Cite this article

Abstract

CHIMAERAS (or “allophenic individuals”) let us see the pedigree of cells. For instance, a blastocyst compounded from a black-coated-mouse embryo and a white-coated-mouse embryo may develop into a striped or piebald adult mouse1. In other adult tissues, other markers (such as isozymes) reveal a similar conglomerate of two cell types2. Naturally occurring mosaics, such as those which arise according to the Lyon hypothesis through random _X_-inactivation in females, provide further examples3,4. In every case, the chimaeric pattern records something of the developmental history of the individual. Indeed, it has been claimed that the assortment of cell types in the chimaeric differentiated tissue provides some crucial evidence about the mechanisms of differentiation and morphogenesis. In particular, Mintz1 and Tettenborn _et al._4 have sought to infer the initial numbers of specific tissue progenitors from observations of how often, in mosaic animals, those tissues are not mosaic, but homogeneous. We shall analyse this type of inference, and argue that the conclusions to which it properly leads do not have quite the significance that has been suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mintz, B., in Control Mechanisms of Growth and Differentiation (Symp. 25, Soc. Exp. Biol., Cambridge University, London, 1971).
    Google Scholar
  2. Moore, W. J., and Mintz, B., Develop. Biol., 27, 55 (1972).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Nesbitt, M. N., and Gartler, S. M., Ann. Rev. Genet., 5, 143 (1971).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Tettenborn, U., Dofuku, R., and Ohno, S., Nature New Biology, 234, 37 (1971).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Garcia-Bellido, A., and Merriam, J. R., J. Exp. Zool., 170, 61 (1969).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Tarkowski, A. K., Nature, 190, 857 (1961).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  7. McLaren, A., and Bowman, P., Nature, 224, 238 (1969).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  8. Nature New Biology, 235, 33 (1972).
  9. Nesbitt, M. N., Develop. Biol., 26, 252 (1971).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Rosenquist, G. C., J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 24, 367 (1970).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Rawles, M. E., Physiol. Rev., 28, 383 (1948).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. McLaren, A., in Handbook of Molecular Cytology (edit. by Lima-de-Faria, A.) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969).
    Google Scholar
  13. Wolpert, L., and Gingell, D., J. Theoret. Biol., 29, 147 (1970).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, J. H., J. Theoret. Biol. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology as Applied to Medicine, Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, W1P 6DB
    J. H. LEWIS, D. SUMMERBELL & L. WOLPERT

Authors

  1. J. H. LEWIS
  2. D. SUMMERBELL
  3. L. WOLPERT

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LEWIS, J., SUMMERBELL, D. & WOLPERT, L. Chimaeras and Cell Lineage in Development.Nature 239, 276–279 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/239276a0

Download citation

This article is cited by