The role of nonlinear dynamics of the syrinx in the vocalizations of a songbird (original) (raw)

Nature volume 395, pages 67–71 (1998)Cite this article

Abstract

Birdsong is characterized by the modulation of sound properties over a wide range of timescales1. Understanding the mechanisms by which the brain organizes this complex temporal behaviour is a central motivation in the study of the song control and learning system2,3,4,5,6,7,8. Here we present evidence that, in addition to central neural control, a further level of temporal organization is provided by nonlinear oscillatory dynamics that are intrinsic to the avian vocal organ. A detailed temporal and spectral examination of song of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) reveals a class of rapid song modulations that are consistent with transitions in the dynamical state of the syrinx. Furthermore, in vitro experiments show that the syrinx can produce a sequence of oscillatory states that are both spectrally and temporally complex in response to the slow variation of respiratory or syringeal parameters. As a consequence, simple variations in a small number of neural signals can result in a complex acoustic sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenewalt, C. H. Brid Song: Acoustics and Physiology (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, (1968)).
    Google Scholar
  2. Nottebohm, F., Stokes, T. M. & Leonard, C. M. Central control of song in the canary, Serinus canarius. J. Comp. Neurol. 165, 457–486 (1976).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Nottebohm, F., Kelley, D. B. & Paton, J. A. Connections of vocal control nuclei in the canary telencephalon. J. Comp. Neurol. 207(1982).
  4. McCasland, J. S. Neuronal control of bird song production. J. Neurosci. 7, 23–39 (1987).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Scharff, C. & Nottebohm, F. Acomparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning. J. Neurosci. 11, 2896–2913 (1991).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Konishi, M. Pattern generation in birdsong. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4, 827–831 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Vu, E., Mazurek, M. E. & Kuo, Y.-C. Identification of a forebrain motor programming network for the learned song of zebra finches. J. Neurosci. 14, 6924–6934 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Yu, A. & Margoliash, D. Temporal hierarchical control of singing in birds. Science 273, 1871–1875 (1996).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Immelman, K. in Bird Vocalizations (ed. Hinde, R. A.) pp. 61–74 (Cambridge Univ. Press, (1969)).
    Google Scholar
  10. Price, P. H. Developmental determinants of structure in zebra finch song. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 93, 260–277 (1979).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Fletcher, N. H. Mode locking in non-linearly excited inharmonic musical oscillators. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 1566–1569 (1978).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, E. A. Perspectives of Nonlinear Dynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press, (1992)).
    Google Scholar
  13. Hartley, R. S. & Suthers, R. A. Airflow and pressure during canary song: direct evidence for mini-breaths. J. Comp. Phys. A 165, 15–26 (1989).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Goller, F. & Suthers, R. A. Implications for lateralization of bird song from unilateral gating of bilateral motor patterns. Nature 373, 63–66 (1995).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  15. Goller, F. & Larsen, O. N. Anew mechanism of sound generation in songbirds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14787–14791 (1997).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  16. Fletcher, N. H. Bird song — a quantitative acoustic model. J. Theor. Biol. 135, 455–481 (1988).
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  17. Ishizaka, K. & Flanagan, J. L. Synthesis of voiced sounds from a two-mass model of the vocal cords. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 51, 1233–1268 (1972).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Bertram, C. D. & Pedley, T. J. Amathematical model of unsteady collapsible tube behaviour. J. Biomech. 15, 39–50 (1982).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Berry, D. A., Herzel, H., Titze, I. R. & Krischer, K. Interpretation of biomechanical simulations of normal and chaotic vocal fold oscillations with empirical eigenfunctions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3595–3604 (1994).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  20. Herzel, H., Berry, D. A., Titze, I. R. & Saleh, M. Analysis of vocal disorders with methods from nonlinear dynamics. J. Speech Hear. Res. 37, 1008–1019 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Thompson, D. J. Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis. Proc. IEEE 70, 1055–1096 (1982).
    Article ADS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank W. Denk, M. Konishi and S. S.-H. Wang for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, New Jersey, 07974, USA
    Michale S. Fee, Boris Shraiman & Partha P. Mitra
  2. Physics Department, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, California, USA
    Bijan Pesaran

Authors

  1. Michale S. Fee
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Boris Shraiman
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Bijan Pesaran
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Partha P. Mitra
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toMichale S. Fee.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fee, M., Shraiman, B., Pesaran, B. et al. The role of nonlinear dynamics of the syrinx in the vocalizations of a songbird.Nature 395, 67–71 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/25725

Download citation

This article is cited by