Information processing of visual stimuli in an ‘extinguished’ field (original) (raw)

Nature volume 282, pages 722–724 (1979)Cite this article

Abstract

Lesions of the right parieto-occipital cortex in man produce a variety of behavioural disturbances which interfere with the detection of, and orientation to external stimuli1. One striking example is extinction to double simultaneous stimulation (DSS), in which presentation of a single stimulus in any area of the visual field results in its accurate description, but lateralised simultaneous presentation of two stimuli, one in each field, results in the verbal description of only the stimulus in the right visual field (RVF)2. While extinction to DSS can also be demonstrated in other (non-visual) sensory modalites3, and is occasionally seen following left-hemisphere lesions4 our concern here is with visual extinction to DSS following right parieto-occipital lesions whose precise nature is poorly understood although variety of theories have been proposed to account for it5–7. One of the critical, yet unexplored questions about extinction concerns the fate of the extinguished stimulus. The following observations demonstrate that although the extinguished stimulus often goes completely unnoticed by the patient, the patients are able to utilise the extinguished stimulus in an interfield comparison task. Accurate same/different judgments between the visual fields could be made in situations in which the patients did not know the identity of, and at times even denied the presence of, the left field stimulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedland, R. P. & Weinstein, E. A. in Hemi-Inattention and Hemisphere Speicalization (eds Weinstein E. A. & Friedland, R. P.) 1–31 (Raven, New York, 1977).
    Google Scholar
  2. Bender, M. B. in Hemi-Inattention and Hemisphere Specialization (eds Weinstein, E. A. & Friedland, R. P.) 107–110 (Raven, New York, 1977).
    Google Scholar
  3. Critchley, M. Brain 72, 538–561 (1949).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Denny-Brown, D. & Banker, B. Archs neurol. Psychiat. 71, 302–313 (1954).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Eidelberg, E. & Schwartz, A. S. Brain 94, 91–108 (1971).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Heilman, K. M. & Valenstein, E. Neurology 22, 660–664 (1972).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Battersby, W. S., Bender, M. B. & Pollack, M. Brain 79, 68–93 (1956).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. New, P. F. J. & Scott, W. R. Computerized Tomography of the Brain (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1975).
    Google Scholar
  9. Gazzaniga, M. S. The Bisected Brain (Appleton-Century-Croft, New York, 1970).
    Google Scholar
  10. Treisman, A. M. J. verb. Learning verb. Behav. 3, 449–459 (1964).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Lewis, J. L. J. exp. Psych. 85, 225–228 (1970).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. MacKay, D. G. Q. J. exp. Psych. 25, 22–28 (1973).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Lackner, J. R. & Garrett, M. F. Cognition 1, 359–374 (1973).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Cornell University Medical Center, 1300 York Avenue, New York, 10021
    Bruce T. Volpe, Joseph E. Ledoux & Micheal S. Gazzaniga

Authors

  1. Bruce T. Volpe
  2. Joseph E. Ledoux
  3. Micheal S. Gazzaniga

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volpe, B., Ledoux, J. & Gazzaniga, M. Information processing of visual stimuli in an ‘extinguished’ field.Nature 282, 722–724 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/282722a0

Download citation

This article is cited by