Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome (original) (raw)
- Letter
- Published: 19 January 1989
Nature volume 337, pages 283–285 (1989)Cite this article
- 1469 Accesses
- 519 Citations
- 15 Altmetric
- Metrics details
Abstract
In the traditional view of molecular evolution, the rate of point mutation is uniform over the genome of an organism and variation in the rate of nucleotide substitution among DNA regions reflects differential selective constraints1,2. Here we provide evidence for significant variation in mutation rate among regions in the mammalian genome. We show first that substitutions at silent (degenerate) sites in protein-coding genes in mammals seem to be effectively neutral (or nearly so) as they do not occur significantly less frequently than substitutions in pseudogenes. We then show that the rate of silent substitution varies among genes and is correlated with the base composition of genes and their flanking DNA. This implies that the variation in both silent substitution rate and base composition3 can be attributed to systematic differences in the rate and pattern of mutation over regions of the genome. We propose that the differences arise because mutation patterns vary with the timing of replication of different chromosomal regions in the germline. This hypothesis can account for both the origin of isochores in mammalian genomes4 and the observation5 that silent nucleotide substitutions in different mammalian genes do not have the same molecular clock.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Kimura, M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (Cambridge University Press, 1983).
Book Google Scholar - Sharp, P. M. & Li, W.-H. Molec. biol. Evol. 4, 222–230 (1987).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Aota, S. & Ikemura, T. Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 6345–6355 (1986).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Bernardi, G. et al. Science 228, 953–958 (1985).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Li, W.-H., Tanimura, M. & Sharp, P. M. J. molec. Evol. 25, 330–342 (1987).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Li, W.-H., Gojobori, T. & Nei, M. Nature 292, 237–239 (1981).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Miyata, T. & Hayashida, H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 5739–5743 (1981).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Fukasawa, K. M. et al. Genetics 115, 177–184 (1987).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar - Miyata, T. et al. J. molec. Evol. 19, 28–35 (1982).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Filipski, J. J. theor. Biol. 134, 159–164 (1988).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Smithies, O., Engels, W. R., Devereux, J. R., Slightom, J. L. & Shen, S-h. Cell 26, 345–353 (1981).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Mouchiroud, D. & Gautier, C. Molec. biol. Evol. 5, 192–194 (1988).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Nadeau, J. H. & Taylor, B. A. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 814–818 (1984).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Friedberg, E. C. DNA Repair (Freeman, New York, 1985).
Google Scholar - Topal, M. D. & Fresco, J. R. Nature 263, 285–289 (1976).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Holmquist, G. P. Am. J. hum. Genet. 40, 151–173 (1987).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar - Leeds, J. M., Slabaugh, M. B. & Mathews, C. K. Molec. cell Biol. 5, 3443–3450 (1985).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Kelly, T. & Stillman, B. (eds) Cancer Cells 6: Eukaryotic DNA Replication (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, 1988).
- Fersht, A. R. & Knill-Jones, J. W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 4251–4255 (1981).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Holmquist, G., Gray, M., Porter, T. & Jordan, J. Cell 31, 121–129 (1982).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Brown, E. H. et al. Molec cell. Biol. 7, 450–457 (1987).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Filipski, J. FEBS Lett. 217, 184–186 (1987).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Bohr, V. A., Phillips, D. H. & Hanawalt, P. C. Cancer Res. 47, 6426–6436 (1987).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Prelich, G. & Stillman, B. Cell 53, 117–126 (1988).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Bernardi, G. & Bernardi, G. J. molec. Evol. 24, 1–11 (1986).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Gillespie, J. H. Genetics 113, 1077–1091 (1986).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar - Ikemura, T. Molec. biol Evol. 2, 13–34 (1985).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Hanai, R. & Wada, A. J. molec Evol. 27, 321–325 (1988).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Nei, M. & Graur, D. Evol. Biol. 17, 73–118 (1984).
Article Google Scholar - Tajima, F. & Nei, M. Molec. biol. Evol. 1, 269–285 (1984).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Author information
Author notes
- Wen-Hsiung Li: Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas, PO Box 20334, Houston, Texas 77225, USA
- Paul M. Sharp: To whom correspondence should be addressed
Authors and Affiliations
- Department of Genetics, Trinity College, Dublin, 2, Ireland
Kenneth H. Wolfe, Paul M. Sharp & Wen-Hsiung Li
Authors
- Kenneth H. Wolfe
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Paul M. Sharp
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Wen-Hsiung Li
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolfe, K., Sharp, P. & Li, WH. Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome.Nature 337, 283–285 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/337283a0
- Received: 05 July 1988
- Accepted: 07 December 1988
- Issue Date: 19 January 1989
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/337283a0