Reassessment of comparative evidence for Hamilton and Zuk theory on the evolution of secondary sexual characters (original) (raw)

Nature volume 339, pages 618–620 (1989) Cite this article

Abstract

HAMILTON and Zuk1 proposed that elaborate secondary sexual characters may have evolved because they act as cues in mate choice by revealing the health of a potential mate. From this theory, they derived the prediction that species which are more liable to parasitic infection should possess well-developed secondary sexual characters. They went on to demonstrate a positive association between prevalence of haematozoa and plumage brightness across species of North American passerine birds. Subsequent analyses by one of us2 on the same colour data confirmed that the relationship with male brightness existed even when the effects of phylogenetic associations were taken into account. The relationship was also found across European passerines when behavioural and ecological correlates of colour and phytogeny were accounted for2. Here, using independently derived plumage brightness scores, we question these conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. Science 218, 384–387 (1982).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  2. Read, A. F. Nature 327, 68–70 (1987).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  3. Field Guide to the Birds of North America, 2nd edn (National Geographic Society, Washington, 1987).
  4. Ridley, M. The Explanation of Organic Diversity (Clarendon, Oxford, 1983).
    Google Scholar
  5. Pagel, M. D. & Harvey, P. H. Q. Rev. Biol. 63, 413–440 (1988).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Baker, R. R. & Parker, G. A. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 287, 63–130 (1979).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  7. Peterson, R., Mountfort, G. & Hollom P. A. D. A Field Guide to the Birds of Britain and Europe. 4th edn (Collins, London, 1983).
    Google Scholar
  8. Read, A. F. in Parasitism and Host Behaviour (eds Barnard, C. J. & Behnke, M.) (Taylor and Francis, London, in the press).
  9. Harvey, P. H., Read, A. F., John, J. L., Gregory, R. & Keymer, A. E. in Parasitism: Coexistence or Conflict? (eds Aeschlimann, A. & Toft, C.) (Oxford University Press, in the press).
  10. Zuk, M. in Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution of Bird-Parasite Interactions (eds Loye, J. E., Van Riper, C., & Zuk, M.) (Oxford University Press, in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK
    Andrew F. Read & Paul H. Harvey

Authors

  1. Andrew F. Read
  2. Paul H. Harvey

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Read, A., Harvey, P. Reassessment of comparative evidence for Hamilton and Zuk theory on the evolution of secondary sexual characters.Nature 339, 618–620 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/339618a0

Download citation

This article is cited by