Resistance to positional noise in human vision (original) (raw)

• Letter
• Published: 08 February 1990

Nature volume 343, pages 554–555 (1990)Cite this article

• 158 Accesses
• 17 Citations
• 3 Altmetric
• Metrics details

Abstract

HUMAN eyes are in constant and rapid motion even when observers try to maintain steady fixation1,2. Also, the visual system has a sluggish temporal response3. In combination, these two factors would be expected to blur stimuli and reduce spatial sensitivity4,5. But observers are able to detect a difference in separation of a few seconds of arc between two closely spaced parallel lines6. Here we report that even very large amounts of positional jitter of the line pair has minimal impact on this ability. This result is in marked contrast to the deterioration observed when targets are swept linearly across the retina5, but is consistent with a system that must ignore oculomotor jitter. To explain these results will require a re-evaluation of current models of position coding in human vision5,7,8.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

• Purchase on SpringerLink
• Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

• Log in
• Learn about institutional subscriptions
• Read our FAQs
• Contact customer support

Similar content being viewed by others

References

1. Hallett, P. E. in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance (eds Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L. & Thomas, J. P.) Ch 10, 1–112 (Wiley, New York, 1986).
   Google Scholar
2. Krauskopf, J., Cornsweet, T. & Riggs, L. J. opt. Soc. Am. 50, 572–578 (1960).
   Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
3. Legge, G. E. Vision Res. 18, 69–81 (1978).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
4. Burr, D. Nature 284, 164–165 (1980).
   Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
5. Morgan, M. J. & Benton, S. Nature 340, 385–386 (1989).
   Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
6. Westheimer, G. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 18, 893–912 (1979).
   CAS PubMed Google Scholar
7. Klein, S. A. & Levi, D. M. J. opt. Soc. Am. A2, 1170–1190 (1985).
8. Watt, R. J. & Morgan, M. J. Vision Res. 25, 1661–1674 (1985).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
9. Lindblohm, B. & Westheimer, G. J. opt. Soc. Am. 6, 585–589 (1989).
   Article ADS Google Scholar
10. Barlow, H. B. J. Physiol., Lond. 116, 290–306 (1952).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
11. Yap, Y. L., Levi, D. M. & Klein, S. A. Vision Res. 29, 789–802 (1989).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
12. Morgan, M. J., Watt, R. J. & McKee, S. P. Vision Res. 23, 541–546 (1983).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
13. Watson, A. B. in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance (eds Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L. & Thomas, J. P.) Ch 6., 1–43 (Wiley, New York, 1986).
    Google Scholar
14. Fahle, M. & Poggio, T. Proc. Roy. Soc. B213, 451–477 (1981).
    ADS CAS Google Scholar
15. Burr, D. C. Vision Res. 19, 835–837 (1979).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
   David R. Badcock
2. Graduate Group in Biophysics, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA
   Terrence L. Wong

Authors

1. David R. Badcock
2. Terrence L. Wong

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badcock, D., Wong, T. Resistance to positional noise in human vision.Nature 343, 554–555 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/343554a0

Download citation

• Received: 29 August 1989
• Accepted: 20 November 1989
• Issue date: 08 February 1990
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/343554a0

This article is cited by