Genetic fingerprinting reflects population differentiation in the California Channel Island fox (original) (raw)

Nature volume 344, pages 764–767 (1990)Cite this article

Abstract

RESTRICTION fragment profiles generated by hybridization of hypervariable minisatellite DNA probes have been used for paternity analysis but not for comparisons at the level of populations, because the profiles are thought to evolve too rapidly to be informative over large time intervals1–3. But in small isolated populations, the fixation of restriction-fragment polymorphisms can outpace the generation of fragment-length variability through recombination. Here we report on an analysis of DNA fingerprints of the California Channel Island fox (Urocyon littoralis). These foxes comprise an island dwarf species found only on six of the Channel Islands off the coast of southern California4,5. Variability of restriction-fragment profiles within fox populations, as indicated by the average percentage difference (APD), varied widely among the islands, from 0.0% (no variation) to 25.3% . The APDs between populations were considerably greater (43.8% to 84.4%). In addition, foxes on each island can be distinguished by the presence of diagnostic restriction fragments. Maximum parsimony and phenetic trees relating foxes from different islands are consistent with the archaeozoological and geological record. Therefore, in small populations of genetically isolated mammals, differences among hypervariable restriction-fragment profiles can be used to estimate relative genetic variability and to reconstruct the evolutionary relationships of natural populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lynch, M. Molec. Biol. Evol. 5, 584–599 (1988).
    CAS Google Scholar
  2. Burke, T. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4, 139–144 (1989).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Lewin, R. Science 243, 1549–1551 (1989).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  4. Hall, E. R. Mammals of North America Vol. 2 (Wiley, New York, 1981).
    Google Scholar
  5. Collins, P. W. in Recent Advances in California Islands Research, (ed. Hochberg, F. G.) (Proc. Third Channel Island Symposium, Santa Barbara, California) (in the press).
  6. Yuhki, N. & O'Brien, S. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 836–840 (1990).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  7. Gilbert, D. A. et al. Am. J. hum. Genet. (in the press).
  8. Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V. & Thein, S. L. Nature 316, 76–79 (1985).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Burke, T. & Bruford, M. W. Nature 327, 146–152 (1987).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  10. Wetton, J. H., Carter, R. E., Parkin, D. T. & Walters, D. Nature 327, 147–149 (1987).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  11. Jeffreys, A. J. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 2823–2836 (1987).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Jeffreys, A. J. & Morton, D. B. Anim. Genet. 18, 1–15 (1987).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Georges, M. et al. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 47, 127–131 (1988).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Burke, T., Davis, N. B., Bruford, M. W. & Hatchwell, B. J. Nature 338, 249–251 (1989).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  15. Wright, S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations Vol. 2 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1969).
    Google Scholar
  16. O'Brien, S. J. & Everman, J. F. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 254–259 (1988).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Nei, M., Maruyama, T. & Chakraborty, R. Evolution 29, 1–10 (1975).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Laughrin, L. in The Califnornia Islands: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Symposium (ed. Power, D. M.) 745–749 (Proc. Second Channel Island Symposium, Santa Barabara, California, 1980).
    Google Scholar
  19. Kovach, S. D. & Dow, R. J. Island Fox Research on San Nicolas Island (Annual Report, Department of the Navy, Pacific Missile Test Center, Pt. Magu, California, 1985).
    Google Scholar
  20. Brown, W. M., George, M. & Wilson, A. C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 1967–1971 (1979).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  21. Avise, J. C. et al. A. Rev. ecol. Syst. 18, 489–522 (1987).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V. & Thein, S. L. Nature 314, 67–73 (1985).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  23. Wayne, R. K. et al. J. Heredity 80, 447–454 (1989).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Robert K. Wayne: To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biological Carcinogenesis and Development Program, Program Resources Incorporated, NCI-FCRF, Frederick, Maryland, Z1701, USA
    Dennis A. Gilbert
  2. Department of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218, USA
    Dennis A. Gilbert
  3. Department of Biology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, 90024, USA
    Niles Lehman & Robert K. Wayne
  4. Laboratory of Viral Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, Z1701, USA
    Stephen J. O'Brien

Authors

  1. Dennis A. Gilbert
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Niles Lehman
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Stephen J. O'Brien
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Robert K. Wayne
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbert, D., Lehman, N., O'Brien, S. et al. Genetic fingerprinting reflects population differentiation in the California Channel Island fox.Nature 344, 764–767 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/344764a0

Download citation

This article is cited by