Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion (original) (raw)

Nature volume 405, pages 1052–1055 (2000)Cite this article

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 08 February 2001

Abstract

Languages, like molecules, document evolutionary history. Darwin1 observed that evolutionary change in languages greatly resembled the processes of biological evolution: inheritance from a common ancestor and convergent evolution operate in both. Despite many suggestions2,3,4, few attempts have been made to apply the phylogenetic methods used in biology to linguistic data. Here we report a parsimony analysis of a large language data set. We use this analysis to test competing hypotheses—the “express-train”5 and the “entangled-bank”6,7 models—for the colonization of the Pacific by Austronesian-speaking peoples. The parsimony analysis of a matrix of 77 Austronesian languages with 5,185 lexical items produced a single most-parsimonious tree. The express-train model was converted into an ordered geographical character and mapped onto the language tree. We found that the topology of the language tree was highly compatible with the express-train model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1871).
    Google Scholar
  2. Kirch, P. V. & Green, R. C. History, phylogeny, and evolution in Polynesia. Curr. Anthropol. 28, 431– 456 (1987).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Mace, R. & Pagel, M. The comparative method in anthropology. Curr. Anthropol. 35, 549– 564 (1994).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Ruvolo, M. in Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (eds Hoenigswald, H. M. & Wiener, L. F.) 193– 216 (Univ. Pennsylvania Press, Pennsylvania, 1987).
    Google Scholar
  5. Diamond, J. M. Express train to Polynesia. Nature 336, 307–308 (1988).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  6. Terrell, J. History as a family tree, history as an entangled bank: Constructing images and interpretations of prehistory in the South Pacific. Antiquity 62, 642–657 ( 1988).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Terrell, J., Hunt, T. L. & Gosden, C. The dimensions of social life in the Pacific. Curr. Anthropol. 38, 155–195 (1997).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Hillis, D. M., Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Cunningham, C. W. Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. Science 264, 671–676 (1994).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Crowley, T. An Introduction to Historical Linguistics 3rd edn (Oxford Univ. Press, Auckland, 1997).
    Google Scholar
  10. Warnow, T. Mathematical approaches to comparative linguistics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 6585–6590 (1997).
    Article ADS MathSciNet CAS Google Scholar
  11. Bateman, R. et al. Speaking of forked tongues. Curr. Anthropol. 31, 1–24 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Moore, J. H. Putting anthropology back together again: The ethnogenetic critique of cladistic theory. Am. Anthropol. 96, 925–948 (1994).
  13. Bellwood, P. The Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago 2nd edn (Univ. Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 1997).
    Google Scholar
  14. Bellwood, P. The Austronesian dispersal and the origin of languages. Sci. Am. 265, 88–93 ( 1991).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  15. Blust, R. The prehistory of the Austronesian speaking peoples: a view from language. J. World Prehist. 9, 453– 510 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Melton, T. et al. Polynesian genetic affinities with Southeast Asian populations as identified by mtDNA analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57, 403–414 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Green, R. C. Integrating historical linguistics with archaeology: Insights from research in Remote Oceania. Bull. Indo-Pacific Prehist. Ass. 18, 3–16 (1999).
    Google Scholar
  18. Lum, J. K. & Cann, R. L. mtDNA and language support a common origin of Micronesians and Polynesians in Island Southest Asia. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 105, 109–119 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Kirch, P. V. The Lapita Peoples (Blackwell, Cambridge, 1997).
    Google Scholar
  20. Terrell, J. Prehistory in the Pacific Islands: A Study of Variation in Language, Customs, and Human Biology (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1986).
    Google Scholar
  21. Martin, A. Hammerhead shark origins. Nature 364, 494 (1993).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  22. Diamond, J. M. Guns, Germs and Steel (Jonathan Cape, London, 1997).
    Google Scholar
  23. Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Variation Version 3.05. (Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts, 1992).
    Google Scholar
  24. Sanderson, M. J. & Donoghue, M. J. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43, 1781–1795 (1989).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Blust, R. in Currents in Pacific Linguistics: Papers on Austronesian Languages and Ethnolinguistics in Honour of George W. Grace (ed. Blust, R.) 27–42 (Australian National Univ., Canberra, 1991).
    Google Scholar
  26. Weisler, M. I. Hard evidence for prehistoric interaction in Polynesia. Curr. Anthropol. 39, 521–531 ( 1998).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Matisoo-Smith, E. et al. Patterns of prehistoric human mobility in Polynesia indicated by mtDNA from the Pacific rat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 15145–15150 (1998).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  28. Ross, M. D. in Comparative Austronesian Dictionary: An Introduction to Austronesian Studies (ed. Tryon, D. T.) 27–42 (ANU, Canberra, 1994).
    Google Scholar
  29. Swofford, D. L. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP*) Version 4.0d65. (Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts, 1999).
    Google Scholar
  30. Cunningham, C. W., Omland, K. E. & Oakley, T. H. Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical reappraisal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 361– 366 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to R. Blust for making the Austronesian Comparative Dictionary available to us. We thank M. Corballis, R. Green and A. Rodrigo for comments on the manuscript; R. Clark for advice; and H. Tse for programming assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, 92019, Auckland , New Zealand
    Russell D. Gray & Fiona M. Jordan

Authors

  1. Russell D. Gray
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Fiona M. Jordan
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toRussell D. Gray.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gray, R., Jordan, F. Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion .Nature 405, 1052–1055 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35016575

Download citation

This article is cited by