Magnetite defines a vertebrate magnetoreceptor (original) (raw)

Nature volume 406, pages 299–302 (2000)Cite this article

Abstract

The key behavioural, physiological and anatomical components of a magnetite-based magnetic sense have been demonstrated in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss )1. Candidate receptor cells located within a discrete sub-layer of the olfactory lamellae contained iron-rich crystals that were similar in size and shape to magnetite crystals extracted from salmon1,2. Here we show that these crystals, which mapped to individual receptors using confocal and atomic force microscopy, are magnetic, as they are uniquely associated with dipoles detected by magnetic force microscopy. Analysis of their magnetic properties identifies the crystals as single-domain magnetite. In addition, three-dimensional reconstruction of the candidate receptors using confocal and atomic force microscopy imaging confirm that several magnetic crystals are arranged in a chain of about 1 µm within the receptor, and that the receptor is a multi-lobed single cell. These results are consistent with a magnetite-based detection mechanism2,3, as 1-µm chains of single-domain magnetite crystals are highly suitable for the behavioural and physiological responses to magnetic intensity previously reported in the trout.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walker, M. M. et al. Structure and function of the vertebrate magnetic sense. Nature 390, 371–376 ( 1997).
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  2. Kirschvink, J. L. & Walker, M. M. in Magnetite Biomineralization and Magnetoreception by Living Organisms: A New Biomagnetism (eds Kirschvink, J. L., Jones, D. S. & MacFadden, B. J.) 243–254 (Plenum, New York, 1985).
    Google Scholar
  3. Kirschvink, J. L. & Gould, J. L. Biogenic magnetite as a basis for magnetic field detection in animals. Biosystems 13, 181–201 ( 1981).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Yorke, E. D. A possible magnetic transducer in birds. J. Theor. Biol. 77, 101–105 (1979).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Yorke, E. D. Sensitivity of pigeons to small magnetic field variations. J. theor. Biol. 89, 533–537 ( 1981).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Gould, J. L. Magnetic field sensitivity in animals. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 46, 585–598 (1984).
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  7. Kirschvink, J. L. Biogenic ferrimagnetism: A new biomagnetism, in Biomagnetism (eds Williamson, S. J., Romani, G. L., Kaufman, L. & Modena, I.) 501–531 (Plenum, New York, 1983).
    Chapter Google Scholar
  8. Proksch, R. B. et al. Magnetic force microscopy of the submicron magnetic assembly in a magnetotactic bacterium. Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2582–2584 (1995).
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  9. Babcock, K., Dugas, M., Manalis, S. & Elings, V. Magnetic force microscopy. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 355, 311 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Wittborn, J. et al. Magnetization reversal observation and manipulation of chains of nanoscale magnetic particles using the magnetic force microscope. Nano. Mater. 12, 1149–1152 (1999).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Dunin-Borkowski, R. E. et al. Magnetic microsctructure of magnetotactic bacteria by electron holography. Science 282, 1868– 1870 (1998).
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  12. Walker, M. M., Quinn, T. P., Kirschvink, J. L. & Groot, C. Production of single-domain magnetite throughout life by sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. J. Exp. Biol. 140, 51–63 (1988).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Mann, S., Sparks, N. H. C., Walker, M. M. & Kirschvink, J. L. Ultrastructure, morphology and organization of biogenic magnetite from sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka; implications for magnetoreception. J. Exp. Biol. 140, 35–49 (1988).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Diaz-Ricci, J. C. & Kirschvink, J. L. Magnetic domain state and coercivity predictions for biogenic greigite (Fe3S 4): A comparison of theory with magnetosome observations. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 17039–17315 (1992).
    ADS Google Scholar
  15. Semm, P. & Beason, R. C. Responses to small magnetic field variations by the trigeminal system of the bobolink. Brain Res. Bull. 25, 735–740 ( 1990).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Walker, M. M. Learned magnetic field discrimination in the yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares . J. Comp. Physiol. A 155, 673– 679 (1984).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Walker, M. M. & Bitterman, M. E. Honeybees can be trained to respond to very small changes in geomagnetic field intensity. J. Exp. Biol. 145, 489–494 (1989).
    Google Scholar
  18. Wiltschko, R. & Wiltschko, W. Magnetic Orientation in Animals. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1995).
    Book Google Scholar
  19. Gould, J. L., Kirschvink, J. L., Deffeyes, K. S. Bees have magnetic remanence. Science 201, 1026–1028 ( 1978).
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  20. Lohmann, K. J. Magnetic remanence in the Western Atlantic spiny lobster. J. Exp. Biol. 113, 29–41 ( 1984).
    Google Scholar
  21. Walker, M. M. On a wing and a vector: A model for magnetic navigation by homing pigeons. J. Theor. Biol. 192, 341– 349 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Walker, M. M. Magnetic position determination by homing pigeons. J. Theor. Biol. 197, 271–276 ( 1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Proksch, R. B., Runge, E., Hansma, P. K., Foss, S. & Walsh, B. High field magnetic force microscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 78, 3303–3307 (1995).
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  24. Liou, S. H. & Yao, Y. D. Development of high coercivity magnetic force microscopy tips. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 190, 130–134 (1998).
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Babcock at Digital Imaging for the generous use of the AFM/MFM. The Biological Imaging Research Unit at the School of Medicine, University of Auckland, provided the CLSM and imaging facilities. In addition, we thank S. Edgar, A. Turner, H. Holloway and especially B. Beaumont for their assistance in preparation and viewing samples on the CLSM and transmission electron microscopy. Financial support came from the Marsden Fund and the School of Biological Sciences.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Carol E. Diebel
    Present address: Auckland Museum, Private Bag 92018, Auckland, New Zealand
  2. Roger Proksch
    Present address: Asylum Research, 601 Pine Avenue, Santa Barbara, California, 93117, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Experimental Biology Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
    Carol E. Diebel & Michael M. Walker
  2. Magnetics Laboratory, Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, 93117, California, USA
    Roger Proksch & Peter Neilson
  3. Department of Anatomy with Radiology School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
    Colin R. Green

Authors

  1. Carol E. Diebel
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Roger Proksch
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Colin R. Green
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Peter Neilson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Michael M. Walker
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toCarol E. Diebel.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diebel, C., Proksch, R., Green, C. et al. Magnetite defines a vertebrate magnetoreceptor.Nature 406, 299–302 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35018561

Download citation