Direct, high-resolution measurement of furrow stiffening during division of adherent cells (original) (raw)

Nature Cell Biology volume 3, pages 607–610 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

It is unclear whether cell division is driven by cortical relaxation outside the equatorial region or cortical contractility within the developing furrow alone. To approach this question, a technique is required that can monitor spatially-resolved changes in cortical stiffness with good time resolution. We employed atomic force microscopy (AFM), in force-mapping mode, to track dynamic changes in the stiffness of the cortex of adherent cultured cells along a single scan-line during M phase, from metaphase to cytokinesis. Video microscopy, which we used to correlate the AFM data with mitotic events identified by light microscopy, indicated that the AFM force-mapping technique does not perturb dividing cells. Here we show that cortical stiffening occurs over the equatorial region about 160 seconds before any furrow appears, and that this stiffening markedly increases as the furrow starts. By contrast, polar relaxation of cells does not seem to be an obligatory event for cell division to occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glotzer, M. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 815–823 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Robinson, D. N. & Spudich, J. A. Trends Cell Biol. 10, 228–237 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Wolf, W. A., Chew, T.-L. & Chisholm, R. L. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 55, 108–120 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Rappaport, R. Intl Rev. Cytol. 31, 169–213 (1971).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Wolpert, L. Intl Rev. Cytol. 10, 163–216 (1960).
    Google Scholar
  6. White, J. G. & Borisy, G. G. J. Theor. Biol. 101, 289–316 (1983).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Harris, A. K. NATO ASI Series H 84, 37–66 (1994).
    Google Scholar
  8. Binnig, G., Quate, C. F. & Gerber, C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930–933 (1986).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Radmacher, M., Cleveland, J. P., Fritz, M., Hansma, H. G. & Hansma, P. K. Biophys. J. 66, 2159–2165 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Radmacher, M. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. 16, 47–57 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Rotsch, C., Jacobson, K. & Radmacher, M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 921–926 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Dvorak, J. A. & Nagao, E. Exp. Cell Res. 242, 69–74 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Fishkind, D. J. & Wang, Y.-l. J. Cell Biol. 123, 837–848 (1993).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Cao, L.-g. & Wang, Y.-l. J. Cell Biol. 111, 1905–1911 (1990).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Sanger, J. M. & Sanger, J. W. Microscopy Res. Techn. 49, 190–201 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Fishkind, D. J. & Wang, Y.-l. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 23–31 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Cao, L.-g. & Wang, Y.-l. Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 225–232 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Burton, K. & Taylor, L. Nature 385, 450–454 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Butt, H.-J. & Jaschke, M. Nanotechnology 6, 1–7 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Domke, J. et al. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 19, 367–379 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Domke, J. & Radmacher, M. Langmuir 14, 3320–3325 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Radmacher, M., Fritz, M., Kacher, C. M., Cleveland, J. P. & Hansma, P. K. Biophys. J. 70, 556–567 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Sneddon, I. N. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47–57 (1965).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Canman, A. Harris and T. Salmon (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill), Y. Wang (University of Massachusetts), and J. White (University of Wisconsin) for advice. We also thank B. Bement (University of Wisconsin-Madison) and D. Fishkind (University of Notre Dame) for criticism. We thank S. Bolz and T. Gloe (Ludwig-Maximilians University) for help with confocal microscopy and A. Kardinal for technical assistance. K.J. also thanks H. Gaub (Ludwig-Maximilians University) for hospitality. This work was partially supported by an NIH grant (to K.J.) and by the Deutsche Forschungs-meinscraft (to R.M. and M.R.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Nanoscience, Ludwig Maximilians Universität München, Amalienstrasse 54, München, D-80799, Germany
    Rainer Matzke
  2. Department of Cell and Developmental Biology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 27599 – 7090, North Carolina, USA
    Ken Jacobson
  3. Drittes Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Bürgerstrasse 42, Göttingen, D-37073, Germany
    Manfred Radmacher

Authors

  1. Rainer Matzke
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Ken Jacobson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Manfred Radmacher
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toKen Jacobson.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matzke, R., Jacobson, K. & Radmacher, M. Direct, high-resolution measurement of furrow stiffening during division of adherent cells.Nat Cell Biol 3, 607–610 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35078583

Download citation