Cryptic evolution in a wild bird population (original) (raw)

References

  1. Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. Predicting microevolutionary responses to directional selection on heritable variation. Evolution 49, 241–251 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Reznick, D. N., Shaw, F. H., Rodd, F. H. & Shaw, R. G. Evaluation of the rate of evolution in a natural population of guppies. Science 275, 1934–1937 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Price, T., Kirkpatrick, M. & Arnold, S. J. Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds. Science 240, 798–799 (1988).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  4. Alatalo, R. V., Gustafsson, L. & Lundberg, A. Phenotypic selection on heritable size traits: environmental variance and genetic response. Am. Nat. 135, 464–471 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Cooke, F., Taylor, P. D., Frances, C. M. & Rockwell, R. F. Directional selection and clutch size in birds. Am. Nat. 136, 261–267 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Frank, S. A. & Slatkin, M. Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 92–95 (1992).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1998).
    Google Scholar
  8. Roff, D. A. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1997).
    Book Google Scholar
  9. Hochachka, W. & Smith, J. N. Determinants and consequences of nestling condition in song sparrows. J. Anim. Ecol. 60, 995–1008 (1991).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Lindén, M., Gustafsson, L. & Pärt, T. Selection of fledging mass in the collared flycatcher and the great tit. Ecology 73, 336–343 (1992).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Both, C., Visser, M. E. & Verboven, N. Density-dependent recruitment rates in great tits: the importance of being heavier. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 465–469 (1999).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Sorci, G. & Clobert, J. Natural selection on hatching body size and mass in two environments in the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara). Evol. Ecol. Res. 1, 303–316 (1999).
    Google Scholar
  13. Boltnev, A. I., York, A. E. & Antonelis, G. A. Northern fur seal young: interrelationships among birth size, growth, and survival. Can. J. Zool. 76, 843–854 (1998).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Merilä, J. Genetic variation in offspring condition—an experiment. Funct. Ecol. 10, 465–474 (1996).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Merilä, J., Kruuk, L. E. B. & Sheldon, B. C. Natural selection on the genetical component of body condition in a wild bird population. J. Evol. Biol. (submitted).
  16. Conover, D. O. & Schultz, E. T. Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 248–252 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Visser, M. E. & Holleman, L. J. M. Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 289–294 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Gustafsson, L. Inter- and intraspecific competition for nest holes in a population of the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis. Ibis 130, 11–16 (1988).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Doligez, B., Danchin, E., Clobert, J. & Gustafsson, L. The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding habitat selection in a non-colonial, hole-nesting species, the collared flycatcher. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 1193–1206 (2000).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Alatalo, R. V. & Lundberg, A. Density-dependence in breeding success of the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). J. Anim. Ecol. 53, 969–978 (1984).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Lewontin, R. C. Adaptation. Sci. Am. 239, 212–230 (1978).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Gilchrist, A. S. & Partridge, L. A comparison of the genetic basis of wing size divergence in three parallel body size clines of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 153, 1775–1787 (1999).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  23. Sheldon, B. C., Merilä, J., Lindgren, G. & Ellegren, H. Gender and environmental sensitivity in nestling collared flycatchers. Ecology 79, 1939–1948 (1998).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Groeneveld, E. REML VCE, a Multivariate Multi-Model Restricted Maximum Likelihood (Co)Variance Component Estimation Package, Version 3.2 User's Guide. (Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Behaviour, Federal Research Center of Agriculture (FAL), Mariensee, Germany, 1995). 〈http://www.tzv.fal.de/institut/genetik/pub/eg/vce/manual/manual.html〉
  25. Groeneveld, E., Kovac, M., Wang, T. L. & Fernando, R. L. Computing algorithms in a general purpose BLUP package for multivariate prediction and estimation. Arch. Anim. Breed. 15, 399–412 (1992).
    Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, K. Restricted maximum-likelihood to estimate variance components for animal models with several random effects using a derivative-free algorithm. Genet. Selection Evol. 21, 317–340 (1989).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Blair, H. T. & Pollak, E. J. Estimation of genetic trend in a selected population with and without the use of a control population. J. Anim. Sci. 58, 878–886 (1984).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Southwood, O. I. & Kennedy, B. W. Genetic and environmental trends for litter size in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 69, 3177–3182 (1991).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Merilä, J., Sheldon, B. C. & Ellegren, H. Antagonistic natural selection revealed by molecular sex identification of nestling collared flycatchers. Mol. Ecol. 6, 1167–1175 (1997).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Genstat, 1998. Genstat 5, Release 4.1 (Lawes Agricultural Trust, IACR, Rothamsted, 1998).

Download references