Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities (original) (raw)

References

1. Howe, H. F. & Smallwood, J. Ecology of seed dispersal. Ann. Rev. Eco. Syst. 13, 201–228 (1982).
   Article Google Scholar
2. Chapman, C. A. Primate seed dispersal; coevolution and conservation implications. Evol. Anthropol. 4, 74–82 (1995)).
   Article Google Scholar
3. Cox, P. A., Elmquist, T., Pierson, E. D. & Rainey, W. E. Flying foxes as strong interactors in South Pacific island ecosystems: a conservation hypothesis. Conserv. Biol. 5, 448–454 (1991).
   Article Google Scholar
4. Chapman, C. A. & Chapman, L. J. Survival without dispersers: seedling recruitment under parents. Conserv. Biol. 9, 675–678 (1995).
   Article Google Scholar
5. Aparecida Lopez, M. & Ferrari, S. F. Effects of human colonization on the abundance and diversity of mammals in eastern Brazilian Amazonia. Conserv. Biol. 14, 1658–1665 (2000).
   Article Google Scholar
6. Gilbert, L. E. in Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary–Ecological Perspective (eds Soule, M. E. & Wilcox, B. A.) 11–33 (Sinauer, Sunderland, 1980).
   Google Scholar
7. Bond, W. J. Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 344, 83–90 (1994).
   Article ADS Google Scholar
8. Mills, L. S., Soule, M. E. & Doak, D. F. The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. Bioscience 43, 219–224 (1993).
   Article Google Scholar
9. Power, M. E. et al. Challenges in the quest for keystones. Bioscience 46, 609–620 (1996).
   Article Google Scholar
10. May, R. M. in Theoretical Ecology, Principles and Applications (ed. May, R. M.) 49–70 (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1976).
    Google Scholar
11. Addicott, J. F. in A New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems (eds Price, P. W., Slobodchikoff, C. N. & Gaud, W. S.) 437–455 (Wiley, New York, 1984).
    Google Scholar
12. de Kock, A. E. & Giliomee, J. H. A survey of the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in South African fynbos. J. Entomol. Soc. S. Africa 52, 151–164 (1989).
    Google Scholar
13. Bond, W. J., Yeaton, R. & Stock, W. D. in Ant–Plant Interactions (eds Huxley, C. & Cutler, D.) 448–462 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991).
    Google Scholar
14. Bond, W. J. & Slingsby, P. Collapse of an ant–plant mutualism: the Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) and myrmecochorous Proteaceae. Ecology 65, 1031–1037 (1984).
    Article Google Scholar
15. Cole, F. R., Medeiros, A. C., Loope, L. L. & Zuehlke, W. W. Effects of the Argentine ant on arthropod fauna of Hawaiian high-elevation shrubland. Ecology 73, 1313–1322 (1992).
    Article Google Scholar
16. Ward, P. S. Distribution of the introduced Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) in natural habitats of the lower Sacramento Valley and its effects on the indigenous ant fauna. Hilgardia 55, 1–16 (1987).
    Article Google Scholar
17. Way, M. J., Cammell, M. E., Paiva, M. R. & Collingwood, C. A. Distribution and dynamics of the Argentine ant Linepithema (Iridomyrmex) humile (Mayr) in relation to vegetation, soil conditions, topography and native ant competitor ants in Portugal. Insectes Sociaux 44, 415–433 (1997).
    Article Google Scholar
18. De Kock, A. E., Giliomee, J. H., Pringle, K. L. & Majer, J. D. in Fire in South African Mountain Fynbos (eds van Wilgen, B. W., Richardson, D. M., Kruger, F. J. & van Hensbergen, H. J.) 201–215 (Springer, Berlin, 1992).
    Google Scholar
19. Lawton, J. H. & Brown, V. K. in Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function (eds Schulze, E.-D. & Mooney, H. A.) 255–270 (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
    Google Scholar
20. Cushman, J. H. in Islands: Biological Diversity and Ecosystem Function (eds Vitousik, P. M., Loope, L. L. & Adsersen, H.) 135–147 (Springer, Berlin, 1995).
    Book Google Scholar
21. Brown, J. H. & Henske, E. J. Control of a desert–grassland transition by a keystone rodent guild. Science 250, 1705–1707 (1990).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
22. Howe, H. F. Specialized and generalized dispersal systems: where does the ‘the paradigm’ stand? Vegetatio 107/108, 3–13 (1993).
    Google Scholar
23. Hughes, L. et al. Predicting dispersal spectra: a minimal set of hypotheses based on plant attributes. J. Ecol. 82, 933–950 (1994).
    Google Scholar
24. Slingsby, P. & Bond, W. Ants—friends of the Fynbos: Mimetes hirtus, dispersal and storage by ants. Veld Flora 67, 39–45 (1981).
    Google Scholar
25. Visser, D., Wright, M. G. & Giliomee, J. H. The effect of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), on flower-visiting insects of Protea nitida Mill. (Proteaceae). Afr. Entomol. 4, 285–287 (1996).
    Google Scholar
26. Witt, A. B. R. Factors affecting Myrmecochory in Fynbos. (Thesis, Univ. Stellenbosch, 1993).
    Google Scholar
27. Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The Ants (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1990).
    Book Google Scholar
28. Passera, L. in Exotic ants: Biology, Impact, and Control of Introduced Species (ed. Williams, D. H.) 23–43 (Westview, Boulder, 1994).
    Google Scholar
29. Slingsby, P. & Bond, W. J. The influence of ants on the dispersal distance and seedling recruitment of Leucospermum conocarpodendron (L.) Buek (Proteaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 51, 30–34 (1985).
    Article Google Scholar
30. Bond, W. J. & Breytenbach, G. J. Ants, rodents and seed predation in Proteaceae. S. Afr. J. Zool. 20, 150–154 (1985).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references