Addition and subtraction by human infants (original) (raw)

Nature volume 358, pages 749–750 (1992) Cite this article

An Erratum to this article was published on 28 January 1993

An Erratum to this article was published on 31 December 1992

Abstract

HUMAN infants can discriminate between different small numbers of items1–4, and can determine numerical equivalence across perceptual modalities5,6. This may indicate the possession of true numerical concepts1,4–7. Alternatively, purely perceptual discriminations may underlie these abilities8,9. This debate addresses the nature of subitization, the ability to quantify small numbers of items without conscious counting10,11. Subitization may involve the holistic recognition of canonical perceptual patterns that do not reveal ordinal relationships between the numbers12, or may instead be an iterative or 'counting' process that specifies these numerical relationships4,13. Here I show that 5-month-old infants can calculate the results of simple arithmetical operations on small numbers of items. This indicates that infants possess true numerical concepts, and suggests that humans are innately endowed with arithmetical abilities. It also suggests that subitization is a process that encodes ordinal information, not a pattern-recognition process yielding non-numerical percepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Starkey, P. & Cooper, R. G. Science 210, 1033–1035 (1980).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  2. Strauss, M. S. & Curtis, L. E. Child Dev. 52, 1146–1152 (1981).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Antell, S. & Keating, D. P. Child Dev. 54, 695–701 (1983).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. van Loosbroek, E. & Smitsman, A. W. Devl Psychol. 26, 916–922 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Starkey, P., Spelke, E. S. & Gelman, R. Science 222, 179–181 (1983).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  6. Starkey, P., Spelke, E. S. & Gelman, R. Cognition 36, 97–127 (1990).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Wynn, K. Mind Lang. (in the press).
  8. Davis, H., Albert, M. & Barron, R. W. Science 228, 1222 (1985).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, R. G. in Origins of Cognitive Skills 157–192 (ed. Sophian, C.) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1984).
    Google Scholar
  10. Chi, M. T. H. & Klahr, D. J. exp. Child Psychol. 19, 434–439 (1975).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Silverman, I. W. & Rose, A. P. Devl Psychol. 16, 539–540 (1980).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Mandler, G. & Shebo, B. J. J. exp. Psychol. Gen. 11, 1–22 (1982).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Gallistel, C. R. The Organization of Learning 343–348 (MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1990).
    Google Scholar
  14. Spelke, E. S. in Perceptual Development in Infancy: Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology Vol. 20 (ed. Yonas, A.) 197–234 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1988).
    Google Scholar
  15. Spelke, E. S., Cog. Science 14, 29–56 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Baillargeon, R. Cognition 38, 13–42 (1991).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Baillargeon, R. & DeVos, J. Child Dev. 62, 1227–1246 (1991).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Wynn, K. Cog. Psychol. 24, 220–251 (1992).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721, USA
    Karen Wynn

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wynn, K. Addition and subtraction by human infants.Nature 358, 749–750 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/358749a0

Download citation

This article is cited by