A genetic analysis of senescence in Drosophila (original) (raw)

Nature volume 367, pages 64–66 (1994)Cite this article

Abstract

TWO attractive theories for the evolution of senescence are based on the principle that the force of natural selection decreases with age1–5. The theories differ in the type of age-specific gene action that they assume. Antagonistic pleiotropy2–5 postulates that pleiotropic genes with positive effects early in life and negative effects of comparable magnitude late in life are favoured by selection, whereas genes with the reverse pattern of action are selected against. Mutation accumulation1,3–5 assumes that deleterious mutant alleles with age-specific effects will equilibrate at a lower frequency if their effects are expressed early rather than late in life. Explicit models demonstrate that both mechanisms can lead to the evolution of senescent life histories under reasonable conditions3–5. Antagonistic pleiotropy has gained considerable empirical support4–6, but the evidence in support of mutation accumulation is more sparse4,5,7. Here we report that the genetic variability of mortality in male Drosophila melanogaster increases greatly at very late ages, as predicted by the mutation accumulation hypothesis3–5. The rate of increase in mortality with age exhibits substantial genetic and environmental variability. This result provides a possible explanation for recent observations of non-increasing mortality rates in very old flies8,9.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Medawar, P. B. An Unsolved Problem of Biology (Lewis, London, 1952).
    Google Scholar
  2. Williams, G. C. Evolution 11, 398–411 (1957).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Charlesworth, B. Evolution in Age-structured Populations (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1980).
    MATH Google Scholar
  4. Rose, M. R. The Evolutionary Biology of Aging (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991).
    Google Scholar
  5. Partridge, L. & Barton, N. H. Nature 362, 305–311 (1993).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  6. Service, P. M. Evolution 47, 387–399 (1993).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Roper, C., Pignatelli, P. & Partridge, L. Evolution 47, 445–455 (1993).
    PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Carey, J. R., Liedo, P., Orzco, D. & Vaupel, J. W. Science 258, 457–460 (1992).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Curtsinger, J. W., Fukui, H. H., Townsend, D. R. & Vaupel, J. W. Science 258, 461–463 (1992).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  10. Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, D. Heredity 54, 71–84 (1985).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Falconer, D. S. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (Longman, London, 1989).
    Google Scholar
  12. Charlesworth, B. in Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives (eds Bradbury, J. W. & Andersson, M. B.) 21–40 (Wiley, Chichester, 1987).
    Google Scholar
  13. Charlesworth, B. Evolution 44, 520–538 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Finch, C. E. Longevity, Senescence, and the Genome (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1990).
    Google Scholar
  15. Finch, C. E., Pike, M. C. & Whitten, M. Science 249, 902–905 (1990).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  16. Rose, M. R. & Charlesworth, B. Genetics 97, 173–186 (1981).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  17. Wright, S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations Vol. 3, Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1977).
    Google Scholar
  18. Hartley, H. O. Biometrics 23, 105–114 (1967).
    Article MathSciNet CAS Google Scholar
  19. Searle, S. R. Biometrics 27, 1–76 (1971).
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  20. Mukai, T., Cardellino, R. A., Watanabe, T. K. & Crow, J. F. Genetics 78, 1195–1208 (1974).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  21. Rose, M. R. Evolution 38, 516–526 (1984).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  22. Lindsley, D. L. & Zimm, G. G. The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster (Academic, San Diego, 1992).
    Google Scholar
  23. Engels, W. R. in Mobile DNA (eds Berg, D. E. & Howe, M. M.) (Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington DC, 1989).
    Google Scholar
  24. Comstock, R. E. & Robinson, H. F. in Heterosis (eds Gowen, J. W.) (Iowa State College Press, Ames, 1952).
    Google Scholar
  25. Houle, D. Genetics 130, 195–204 (1992).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Kimberly A. Hughes
    Present address: Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, Illinois, 60513, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Committee on Evolutionary Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60637, USA
    Kimberly A. Hughes
  2. Department of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60637, USA
    Brian Charlesworth

Authors

  1. Kimberly A. Hughes
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Brian Charlesworth
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes, K., Charlesworth, B. A genetic analysis of senescence in Drosophila.Nature 367, 64–66 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/367064a0

Download citation