Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance (original) (raw)

Nature volume 370, pages 140–143 (1994)Cite this article

An Erratum to this article was published on 22 September 1994

Abstract

SINGLE neurons can signal subtle changes in the sensory environment with surprising fidelity, often matching the perceptual sensitivity of trained psychophysical observers1–10. This similarity poses an intriguing puzzle: why is psychophysical sensitivity not greater than that of single neurons? Pooling responses across neurons should average out noise in the activity of single cells, leading to substantially improved psychophysical performance. If, however, noise is correlated among these neurons, the beneficial effects of pooling would be diminished10–12. To assess correlation within a pool, the responses of pairs of neurons were recorded simultaneously during repeated stimulus presentations. We report here that the observed covariation in spike count was relatively weak, the correlation coefficient averaging 0.12. A theoretical analysis revealed, however, that weak correlation can limit substantially the signalling capacity of the pool. In addition, theory suggests a relationship between neuronal responses and psychophysical decisions which may prove useful for identifying cell populations underlying specific perceptual capacities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mountcastle, V., Talbot, W., Sakata, H. & Hyvarinen, J. J. Neurophysiol. 32, 452–484 (1969).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Mountcastle, V., LaMotte, R. & Carli, G. J. Neurophysiol. 35, 122 (1972).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Johnson, K., Darian-Smith, I. & LaMotte, C. J. Neurophysiol. 36, 347–370 (1973).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Johnson, K., Darian-Smith, I., LaMotte, C., Johnson, B. & Oldfield, S. J. Neurophysiol. 42, 1332–1353 (1979).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Tolhurst, D. J., Movshon, J. A. & Dean, A. F. Vision Res. 23, 775–785 (1983).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Bradley, A., Skottun, B. C., Ohzawa, I., Sclar, G. & Freeman, R. D. J. Neurophys. 57, 755–772 (1987).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Hawken, M. J. & Parker, A. J. in Vision: Coding and Efficiency (ed. Blakemore, C.) 103–116 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1990).
    Google Scholar
  8. Vogels, R. & Orban, G. A. J. Neurosci. 10, 3543–3558 (1990).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Recanzone, G. H., Merzenich, M. M. & Schreiner, C. E. J. Neurophysiol. 67, 1071–1091 (1992).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T. & Movshon, J. A. J. Neurosci. 12, 4745–4765 (1992).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, K. J. Neurophysiol. 43, 1793–1815 (1980).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. van Kan, P., Scobey, R. & Gabor, A. Expl Brain Res. 1985, 559–563 (1985).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Newsome, W. T. & Paré, E. B. J. Neurosci. 8, 2201–2211 (1988).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Salzman, C. D., Murasugi, C. M., Britten, K. H. & Newsome, W. T. J. Neurosci. 12, 2331–2355 (1992).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Murasugi, C. M., Salzman, C. D. & Newsome, W. T. J. Neurosci. 13, 1719–1729 (1993).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Worgotter, F., Daunicht, W. & Eckmiller, R. J. Neurosci. Meth. 17, 141–151 (1986).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Zeki, S. M. J. Physiol., Lond. 236, 549–573 (1974).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Anderson, T. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1958).
    MATH Google Scholar
  19. Gawne, T. & Richmond, B. J. Neurosci. 13, 2758–2771 (1993).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Newsome, W. T., Britten, K. H., Movshon, J. A. & Shadlen, M. in Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception. Proc. Retina Res. Fdn (eds Lam, D.M.-K. & Gilbert, C. D.) 171–198 (Portfolio Publishing, The Woodlands, Texas, 1989).
    Google Scholar
  21. Celebrini, S. & Newsome, W. T. J. Neurosci. (in the press).
  22. Dubner, R., Kenshalo, D. R., Maixner, W., Bushnell, M. C. & Oliveras, J. L. J. Neurophysiol. 62, 450–457 (1989).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, 94305, USA
    Ehud Zohary, Michael N. Shadlen & William T. Newsome

Authors

  1. Ehud Zohary
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Michael N. Shadlen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. William T. Newsome
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zohary, E., Shadlen, M. & Newsome, W. Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance.Nature 370, 140–143 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/370140a0

Download citation

This article is cited by