Transcriptional activation by recruitment (original) (raw)

• Ptashne, M. How eukaryotic transcriptional activators work. Nature 335, 683–689 (1988).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ptashne, M. A Genetic Switch: Phage Lambda and Higher Organisms (Cell and Blackwell Scientific, Cambridge, MA, 1992).
  Google Scholar
• Guarente, L. et al. Mutant lambda phage represser with a specific defect in its positive control fucntion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 2236–2239 (1982).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A., Irwin, N. & Ptashne, M. Represser structure and the mechanism of positive control. Cell 32, 319–325 (1983).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bushman, F. D., Shang, C. & Ptashne, M. One glutamic acid residue plays a key role in the activation function of lambda represser. Cell 58, 1163–1171 (1989).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kuldell, N. & Hochschild, N. Amino acid substitutions in the -35 recognition motif of sigma 70 that result in defects in phage lambda repressor-stimulated transcription. J. Bact. 176, 2991–2998 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, M., Moyle, H. & Susskind, M. M. Target of the transcriptional activating function of phage lambda cl protein. Science 263, 75–77 (1994).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Busby, S. & Ebright, R. H. Promoter structure, promoter recognition, and transcription activation in prokaryotes. Cell 79, 743–746 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Busby, S. & Ebright, R. H. Transcription activation at class II CAP-dependent promoters. Mol. Microbiol. (in the press).
• Niu, W. et al. Transcription activation at class II CAP-dependent promoters: two interactions between and RNA polymerase. Cell 87, 1123–1134 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bell, A. et al. Mutations that alter the ability of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein to activate transcription. Nucleic Acids. Res. 18, 7242–7250 (1990).
  Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Zhang, X. & Ebright, R. H. Identification of the activating region of CAP: isolation and characterization of mutants of CAP specifically defective in transcription activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 6081–6085 (1993).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tang, H. et al. Location, structure and function of the target of a transcription activator protein. Genes Dev. 8, 3058–3067 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q. et al. Holo-TFIID supports transcriptional stimulation by diverse activators and from a TATA-less promoter. Genes Dev. 6, 1964–1974 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Igarashi, K. & Ishihama, A. bipartite functional map fo the E. coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit. Cell 65, 1015–1022 (1991).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Ebright, Y. W. & Ebright, R. H. Identification of the target of a transcription activator protein by protein-protein photocrosslinking. Science 265, 90–92 (1994).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ishihama, A. Protein-protein communication within the transcription apparatus. J. Bact. 175, 2483–2489 (1993).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ross, W. et al. A third recognition element in bacterial promoters: DNA binding by the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase. Science 262, 1407–1413 (1993).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Blatter, E. et al. Domain organization of RNA polymerase alpha subunit: C-terminal 85 amino acids constitute a domain capable of dimerization and DNA binding. Cell 78, 889–896 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kumar, A. et al. Role of the sigma 70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase in transcription activation. J. Mol. Biol. 235, 405–413 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dove, S. L., Joung, J. K. & Hochschild, A. Activation of prokaryotic transcription through arbitrary protein-protein contacts. Nature 386, 627–630 (1997).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Joung, J. K., Koepp, D. M. & Hochschild, A. Synergistic activation of transcription by bacteriophage 1 cI protein and E. coli cAMP receptor protein. Science 265, 1863–1866 (1994).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Busby, S. et al. Transcription activation by the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein—receptors bound in tandem at promoters can interact synergistically. J. Mol. Biol. 241, 341–352 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Scott, S., Busby, S. & Beacham, I. Transcriptional coactivation at the ANSB promoters—involvement of the activating regions of CPR and FNR when bound in tandem. Mol. Microb. Biol. 18, 521–531 (1995).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Kustu, S. et al. Expression of sigma 54 (ntrA)-dependent genes is probably united by a common mechanism. Microbiol. Rev. 53, 367–376 (1989).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Magasanik, B. The regulation of nitrogen utilization in enteric bacteria. J. Cell. Biochem. 51, 34–40 (1993).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Popham, D. L. et al. Function of a bacterial activator protein that binds to transcriptional enhancers. Science 243, 629–635 (1989).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Austin, S. & Dixon, R. The prokaryotic enhancer binding protein NTRC has an aTPase activity which is phosphorylation and DNA dependent. EMBO J. 11, 2219–2228 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wedel, A. & Kustu, S. The bacterial enhancer bindign protein NTRC is a molecular machine: ATP hydrolysis is coupled to transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 9, 2042–2052 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Miller, A. et al. RNA polymerase beta' subunit: target for DNA-binding-independent transcriptional activation. Science 275, 1655–1657 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Buck, M. & Cannon, W. Mutation in the RNA polymerase recognition sequence of the Klebsiella pneumoniae nifH promoter permitting transcriptional activation in the absence of NifA binding to upstream activating sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 2597–2612 (1989).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• North, A. & Kustu, S. Mutant forms of the enhancer-binding protein NtrC can activate transcription from solution. J. Mol. Biol. (in the press).
• Struhl, K. Molecular mechanisms of transcriptional regulation in yeast. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58, 1051–1077 (1989).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Struhl, K. Chromatin structure and RNA polymerase II connection: implications for transcription. Cell 84, 179–182 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Koleske, A. J. & Young, R. A. The RNA polymerase II holoenzyme and its implications for gene regulation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 113–116 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Carey, M. A holistic view of the complex. Curr. Biol. 5, 1003–1005 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zawel, L. & Reinberg, D. Common themes in assembly and function of eukaryotic transcription complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 522–561 (1995).
  Article Google Scholar
• Koleske, A. & Young, R. A. An RNA polymerase II holoenzyme responsive to activators. Nature 368, 466–469 (1994).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kim, T. K. et al. Effects of activation-defective TBP mutaitons on transcription initiation in yeast. Nature 369, 252–255 (1994).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nikolov, D. B. et al. Crystal structure of a TFIIB-TBP-TATA element ternary complex. Nature 377, 119–128 (1995).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ma, J. & Ptashne, M. Deletion analysis of GALL4 defines two transcriptional activating segments. Cell 48, 847–853 (1987).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hope, I. A., Mahadevan, S. & Struhl, K. Structural and functional characterization of the short acidic transcriptional activation region of yeast GCN4 protein. Nature 333, 635–640 (1988).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Barberis, A. et al. Contact with a component of the polymerase II holoenzyme suffices for gene activation. Cell 81, 359–368 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Farell, S. et al. Gene activation by recruitment of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Genes Dev. 10, 2359–2367 (1996).
  Article Google Scholar
• Apone, L. et al. Yeast TAP (II)90 is required for cell-cycle progression through G(2)/M but not for general transcription activation. Genes Dev. 10, 2368–2380 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S. & Struhl, K. Connecting a promoter-bound protein to TBP bypasses the need for a transcriptional activation domain. Nature 374, 820–822 (1995).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Klages, N. & Strubin, M. Stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation by recruitment of TBP in vivo. Nature 374, 822–823 (1995).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Xiao, H., Friesen, J. D. & Lis, J. T. Recruiting TATA-binding protein to a promoter: transcriptional activation without an upstream activator. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5757–5761 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Koleske, A. J. et al. A novel transcription factor reveals a functional link between the RNA polymerase II CTD and TFIID. Cell 69, 883–894 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gill, G. & Ptashne, M. Negative effect of the transcriptional activator GAL4. Nature 334, 721–724 (1988).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Almer, A. et al. Removal of positioned nucleosomes form the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction releases additional upstream activating DNA elements. EMBO J. 5, 2689–2696 (1986).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Giardina, C. & Lis, J. T. Dynamic protein-DNA architecture of a yeast heat shock promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2737–2744 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Treizenberg, S. J. Structure and function of transcriptional activation domains. Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev. 5, 190–196 (1995).
  Article Google Scholar
• Hope, I. A. & Struhl, K. Functional dissection of a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, GCN4 of yeast. Cell 46, 885–894 (1986).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ogawa, N. & Oshima, Y. Functional domains of a positive regulatory protein, PHO4, for transcriptional control of the phosphatase regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 2224–2236 (1990).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Reece, R. J. & Ptashne, M. Quantitation of putative activator-target affinities predicts transcriptional activating potentials. EMBO J. 15, 3951–3963 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. C. Peptide-surface association: the case of PDZ and PTB domains. Cell 86, 341–343 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ma, J. & Ptashne, M. The carboxy-terminal 30 amino acids of GAL4 are recognized by GAL80. Cell 50, 137–142 (1987).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Leuther, K. K., Salmeron, J. M. & Johnson, S. A. Genetic evidence that an activation domain of GAL4 does not require acidity and may form a β sheet. Cell 72, 575–585 (1993).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stringer, K. F., Ingles, C. J. & Greenblatt, J. Direct and selective binding of an acidic transcriptional activation domain to the TATA-box factor TFIID. Nature 345, 783–786 (1990).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nerlov, C. & Ziff, E. B. CCAAT/enhancer binding protein amino acid motifs with dual TBP and TFIIB binding ability co-operate to activate transcription in both yeast and mammalian cells. EMBO J. 14, 4318–4328 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pugh, B. F. & Tijan, R. Mechanism of transcriptional activation by Sp1: evidence for coactivators. Cell 61, 1187–1197 (1990).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Reese, J. C. et al. Yeast TAFIIs in a multisubunit complex required for activated transcription. Nature 371, 523–527 (1994).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Burley, S. K. & Roeder R. G. Biochemistry and structural biology of transcription factor IID (TFIID). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 769–799 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Walker, S. S. et al. Transcription activation in cells lacking TAFIIS. Nature 383, 185–188 (1996).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moqtaderi, Z. et al. TBP-associated factors are not generally required for transcriptional activation in yeast. Nature 383, 188–191 (1996).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Verrijzer, C. et al. Binding of TAFs to core elements directs promoter selectivity by RNA polymerase II. Cell 81, 1115–1125 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sauer, F., Hansen, S. & Tijan, R. Multiple TAFIIs directing synergistic activation of transcription. Science 270, 1783–1788 (1995).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hengartner, C. J. et al. Association of an activator with an RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Genes Dev. 9, 897–910 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Xiao, H. et al. Binding of basal transcription factor TFIIH to the acidic activation domains of VP16 and p53. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7013–7024 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tanaka, M. Modulation of promoter occupancy by cooperative DNA/binding and activation-domain function is a major determinant of transcriptional regulation by activators in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4311–4315 (1996).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Felsenfeld, G. et al. Chromatin structure and gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9384–9388 (1996).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gaudreau, L. et al. RNA polymerase II holoenzyme recruitment is sufficient to remodel chromatin at the yeast PHO5 promoter. Cell (in the press).
• Marsolier, M. et al. Reciprocal interferences between nucleosomal organization and transcriptional activity of the yeast SNR6 gene. Genes Dev. 9, 410–422 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Han, M. & Grunstein, M. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell 55, 1137–1145 (1988).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Polach, K. J. & Widom, J. Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 254, 130–149 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Polach, K. J. & Widom, J. A model for the cooperative binding of eukaryotic regulatory proteins to nucleosomal target sites. J. Mol. Biol. 258, 800–812 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. L. & Tamkun, J. W. The Swi-Snf complex: a chromatin remodeling machine? Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 143–146 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Brownell, J. E. & Allis, C. D. Special HATs for special occasions: linking histone acetylation to chromatin assembly and gene activation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6, 176–184 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cairns, B. et al. RSC, an essential, abundant chromatin-remodeling complex. Cell 87, 1249–1260 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. J. et al. RNA polymerase II holeoenzyme contains SWI/SNF regulators involved in chromatin remodeling. Cell 84, 235–244 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Laurent, B. C., Treitel, M. A. & Carlson, M. Functional interdependence of the yeast SNF2, SNF5, and SNF6 proteins in transcriptional activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 2687–2691 (1991).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• DeRobertis, F. et al. The histone deacetylase RPD3 counteracts genomic silencing in Drosophila and yeast. Nature 384, 589–591 (1996).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, J., Nodwell, J. & Mason, S. Transcriptional antitermination. Nature 364, 401–406 (1993).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Benjtley, D. Regulation of transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5, 210–216 (1995).
  Article Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, E. B. & Lis, J. T. Short transcripts of the ternary complex provide insight into RNA polymerase II elongation pausing. J. Mol. Biol. 252, 522–535 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Blau, J. et al. Three functional classes of transcriptional activation domains. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 244–255 (1996).
  Article Google Scholar
• McClure, W. R. Mechanism and control of transcription initiation in prokaryotes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 54, 171–204 (1985).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ninfa, A. J., Reitzer, L. J. & Magasanik, B. Initiation of transcription at the bacterial glnAP2 promoter by purified E. coli components is facilitated by enhancers. Cell 50, 1039–1046 (1987).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sasse-Dwight, S. & Gralla, J. D. Probing the Escherichia coli glnALG upstream activation mechanism in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 8934–8938 (1988).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Straney, D., Straney, S. & Crothers, D. Synergy between Escherichia coli CAP protein and RNA polymerase in the lac promoter open complex. J. Mol. Biol. 206, 41–57 (1989).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. & Gralla, J. D. Micrococcal nuclease as a probe for bound and distorted DNA in lac transcription and repression complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 5017–5028 (1989).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sasse-Dwight, S. & Gralla, J. D. KMnO4 as a probe for lac promoter DNA melting and mechanism in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 8074–8081 (1989).
  Google Scholar
• Malan, T. P., Buc, H. & McClure, W. R. Mechanism of CRP-cAMP activation of the lac operon transcription initiation activation of P1 promoter. J. Mol. Biol. 157, 493–525 (1982).
  Article Google Scholar
• Hawley, D. K. & McClure, W. R. Mechanism of activation of transcription initiation from the lambda-PRM promoter. J. Mol. Biol. 157, 493–525 (1982).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. & Ptashne, M. Gene regulation at the right operator (OR) of bacteriophage lambda III: lambda represser directly activates gene transcription. J. Mol. Biol. 139, 195–205 (1980).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, M., McClure, W. & Susskind, M. Changing the mechanism of transcriptional activation by phage lambda represser. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (in the press).
• Smith, T. & Sauer, R. Dual recognition of open-complex formation and promoter clearance by Arc explains a novel represser to activator switch. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 8868–8872 (1996).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Monsalve, M. et al. Activation and repression of transcription at two different phage E29 promoters are mediated by interaction of the same residues of regulatory protein p4 with RNA polymerase. EMBO J. 15, 383–391 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Choy, H. et al. Repression and activation of transcription by Gal and Lac repressers: involvement of alpha subunit of RNA polymerase. EMBO J. 14, 4523–4529 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Couto, G., Klages, N. & Strubin, M. Synergistic and promoter-selective activation of transcription by recruitment of TFIID and TFIIB. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (in the press).