Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception (original) (raw)

References

  1. Fourier, J. B. J. La théorie analytique de la chaleur. Mém. Acad. R. Sci. 8, 581–622 (1829).
    MATH Google Scholar
  2. Hilbert, D. Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Theorie der linearen Integralgleichungen (Teubner, Leipzig, 1912).
    MATH Google Scholar
  3. Rhode, W. S., Oertel, D. & Smith, P. H. Physiological response properties of cells labeled intracellularly with horseradish peroxidase in cat ventral cochlear nucleus. J. Comp. Neurol. 213, 448–463 (1983).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Joris, P. X. & Yin, T. C. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences. J. Neurophysiol. 73, 1043–1062 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Yin, T. C. & Chan, J. C. Interaural time sensitivity in medial superior olive of cat. J. Neurophysiol. 65, 465–488 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Langner, G. & Schreiner, C. E. Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. J. Neurophysiol. 60, 1799–1822 (1988).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Rauschecker, J. P. & Tian, B. Mechanisms and streams for processing of “what” and “where” in auditory cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11800–11806 (2000).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  8. Recanzone, G. H. Spatial processing in the auditory cortex of the macaque monkey. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11829–11835 (2000).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Tian, B., Reser, D., Durham, A., Kustov, A. & Rauschecker, J. P. Functional specialization in rhesus monkey auditory cortex. Science 292, 290–293 (2001).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  10. Maeder, P. P. et al. Distinct pathways involved in sound recognition and localization: a human fMRI study. NeuroImage 14, 802–816 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Dodge, C. & Jerse, T. A. Computer Music: Synthesis, Composition, and Performance (Schirmer Books, New York, 1997).
    Google Scholar
  12. Depalle, P., Garcia, G. & Rodet, X. A virtual castrato (!?). Proc. Int. Computer Music Conf., Aarhus, Denmark 357–360 (1994).
  13. Shen, C., Smith, Z. M., Oxenham, A. J. & Delgutte, B. Auditory Chimera Demo; available at 〈http://epl.meei.harvard.edu/~bard/chimera〉 (2001).
  14. Licklider, J. Effect of amplitude distortion upon the intelligibility of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 18, 429–434 (1946).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  15. Saberi, K. & Perrot, D. R. Cognitive restoration of reversed speech. Nature 398, 760 (1999).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  16. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D. & Sullivan, J. A. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1085–1099 (1994).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  17. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J. & Ekelid, M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270, 303–304 (1995).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  18. Ghitza, O. On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1628–1640 (2001).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  19. Wightman, F. L. & Kistler, D. J. The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 1648–1661 (1992).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  20. Henning, G. B. & Ashton, J. The effect of carrier and modulation frequency on lateralization based on interaural phase and interaural group delay. Hear. Res. 4, 184–194 (1981).
    Google Scholar
  21. Bernstein, L. R. & Trahiotis, C. Lateralization of low-frequency complex waveforms: The use of envelope-based temporal disparities. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 1868–1880 (1985).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  22. Wilson, B. S. et al. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352, 236–238 (1991).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  23. Rubinstein, J. T., Wilson, B. S., Finley, C. C. & Abbas, P. J. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 127, 108–118 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Litvak, L., Delgutte, B. & Eddington, D. Auditory nerve fiber responses to electrical stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 368–379 (2001).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  25. Greenwood, D. D. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 2592–2604 (1990).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  26. Ville, J. Théorie et applications de la notion de signal analytique. Cables Transmission 2, 61–74 (1948).
    Google Scholar
  27. Troullinos, G., Ehlig, P.,,Chirayil, R., Bradley, J. & Garcia, D. in Digital Signal Processing Applications with the TMS320 Family (ed. Papamichalis, P.) 221–330 (Texas Instruments, Dallas, 1990).
    Google Scholar
  28. Hartmann, W. M. & Johnson, D. Stream segregation and peripheral channeling. Music Percept. 9, 155–184 (1991).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references