Crustacean appendage evolution associated with changes in Hox gene expression (original) (raw)

References

1. Lewis, E. B. Agene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276, 567–570 (1978).
   ADS Google Scholar
2. Raff, R. A. & Kaufman, T. C. Embryos, Genes, and Evolution (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1991).
   Google Scholar
3. Akam, M., Dawson, I. & Tear, G. Homeotic genes and the control of segment diversity. Development 104 (suppl.), 123–133 (1988).
   Google Scholar
4. Bateson, W. Materials for the Study of Variation, Treated with Especial Regard to Discontinuity in the Origin of Species (Macmillan, London, 1894).
   Google Scholar
5. Averof, M. & Akam, M. HOM/Hox genes of Artemia: implications for the origin of insect and crustacean body plans. Curr. Biol. 3, 73–78 (1993).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
6. Averof, M., Dawes, R. & Ferrier, D. Diversification of arthropod Hox genes as a paradigm for the evolution of gene functions. Sem. Dev. Cell. Biol. 7, 539–551 (1996).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
7. Averof, M. & Akam, M. Hox genes and the diversification of insect and crustacean body plans. Nature 376, 420–423 (1995).
   Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
8. Panganiban, G., Sebring, A., Nagy, L. & Carroll, S. The development of crustacean limbs and the evolution of arthropods. Science 270, 1363–1366 (1995).
   Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
9. Calman, W. T. Crustacea (Black, London, 1909).
   Google Scholar
10. Giesbrecht, W. in Handwörterbuch der Naturwissecschaften (ed. Dittler, R.) 800–840 (Fischer, Jena, 1931).
    Google Scholar
11. Schram, F. R. Crustacea (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986).
    Google Scholar
12. Brusca, R. C. & Brusca, G. J. Invertebrates 1–922 (Sinauer, Sunderland Massachusetts, 1990).
    Google Scholar
13. Kelsh, R., Weinzierl, R. O. J., White, R. A. H. & Akam, M. Homeotic gene expression in the locust Schistocerca: an antibody that detects conserved epitopes in Ultrabithorax and Abdominal-A proteins. Dev. Genet. 15, 19–31 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
14. McGinnis, W. & Krumlauf, R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68, 283–302 (1992).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
15. Akam, M. Hox genes and the evolution of diverse body plans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 349, 313–319 (1995).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
16. Burke, A. C., Nelson, C. E., Morgan, B. A. & Tabin, C. Hox genes and the evolution of vertebral axial morphology. Development 121, 333–346 (1995).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
17. Gaunt, S. J. Conservation in the Hox code during morphological evolution. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 38, 549–552 (1994).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
18. Castelli-Gair, J., Greig, S., Micklem, G. & Akam, M. Dissecting the temporal requirements for homeotic gene function. Development 120, 1983–1995 (1994).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
19. Castelli-Gair, J. & Akam, M. How the Hox gene Ultrabithorax specifies two different segments: the significance of spatial and temporal regulation within metemeres. Development 121, 2973–2982 (1995).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
20. Salser, S. J. & Kenyon, C. A. C. elegans Hox gene switches on, off, on, and off again to regulate proliferation, differentiation, and morphogenesis. Development 122, 1651–1661 (1996).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
21. Briggs, D. E. G. The morphology, mode of life, and affinities of Canadaspis perfecta (Crustacea, Phyllocarida), Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 281, 439–487 (1978).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
22. Muller, K. J. & Walossek, D. External morphology and larval development of the Upper Cambrian maxillopod Bredocaris admirabilis. Foss. Strat. 23, 1–70 (1988).
    Google Scholar
23. Walossek, D. The Upper Cambrian Rehbachiella and the phylogeny of Branchiopoda and Crustacea. Foss. Strat. 32, 1–202 (1993).
    Google Scholar
24. Wagner, G. P. The biological homology concept. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 51–69 (1989).
    Article Google Scholar
25. Patel, N. H., Kornberg, T. B. & Goodman, C. S. Expression of engrailed during segmentation in grasshopper and crayfish. Development 107, 201–212 (1989).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
26. Patel, N. H. in Methods in Cell Biology, 44. Drosophila Melanogaster: Practical Uses in Cell Biology (eds Goldstein, L. S. B. & Fyrberg, E.) 445–487 (Academic, New York, 1994).
    Google Scholar

Download references