Cognitive bias and affective state (original) (raw)

Animal behaviour

Nature volume 427, page 312 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

Information processing by humans can be biased by their emotions — for example, anxious and depressed people tend to make negative judgements about events and to interpret ambiguous stimuli unfavourably1,2,3,4. Here we show that such a 'pessimistic' response bias can also be measured in rats that are housed in unpredictable conditions5,6. Our findings indicate that cognitive bias can be used as an indicator of affective state in animals, which should facilitate progress in animal-welfare studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Mean (±1 s.e.) responses to tones during 10 daily 30-min test sessions for male Lister hooded rats housed under 'predictable' (open circles, n = 4) and 'unpredictable' (filled circles, n = 5) conditions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacLeod, A. K. & Byrne, A. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 105, 286–289 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Gotlib, I. H. & Krasnoperova, E. Behav. Therapy 29, 603–617 (1998).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Eysenck, M. W. et al. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 100, 144–150 (1991).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Wright, W. F. & Bower, G. H. Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process 62, 276–291 (1992).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Willner, P. Psychopharmacology 134, 319–329 (1997).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Zurita, A. et al. Behav. Brain Res. 117, 163–171 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Nielsen, B. L. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 63, 79–91 (1999).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Fernandes, C. & File, S. E. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 54, 31–40 (1996).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Spruijt, B. M., van den Bos, R. & Pijlman, F. T. A. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 72, 145–171 (2001).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Berridge, K. C. & Robinson, T. E. Trends Neurosci. 26, 507–513 (2003).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Dawkins, M. S. in Coping with Challenge. Welfare in Animals including Humans (ed. Broom, D.M.) 63–76 (Dahlem University Press, Berlin, 2001).
    Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Centre for Behavioural Biology, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, BS40 5DU, UK
    Emma J. Harding, Elizabeth S. Paul & Michael Mendl

Authors

  1. Emma J. Harding
  2. Elizabeth S. Paul
  3. Michael Mendl

Corresponding author

Correspondence toMichael Mendl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harding, E., Paul, E. & Mendl, M. Cognitive bias and affective state.Nature 427, 312 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/427312a

Download citation

This article is cited by