Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception (original) (raw)

Nature Neuroscience volume 4, pages 127–128 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

If features such as color and orientation are processed separately by the brain at early stages1,2, how does the brain subsequently match the correct color and orientation? We found that spatially superposed pairings of orientation with either color or luminance could be reported even for extremely high rates of presentation, which suggests that these features are coded in combination explicitly by early stages, thus eliminating the need for any subsequent binding of information. In contrast, reporting the pairing of spatially separated features required rates an order of magnitude slower, suggesting that perceiving these pairs requires binding at a slow, attentional stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: The critical rates for 75% accuracy in pairing spatially superimposed features (depicted by the second and fourth icons along the horizontal axis) are nearly ten times faster than rates for pairing spatially separated features (first and third icons).

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 2: The critical rates for 75% accuracy do not differ significantly when spatially separated features are linked to form a group or object (white bars, unlinked versions as depicted by the left icon of each pair; black bars, linked versions as depicted by the right icon of each pair.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zeki, S. M. Nature 274, 423–428 (1978).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Treisman, A. & Gelade, G. Cognit. Psychol. 12, 97–136 (1980).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Cavanagh, P., MacLeod, D. I. A. & Anstis, S. M. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 4, 1428–1438 (1987).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Scholl, B. Cognition (in press).
  5. Kuffler, S. W. J. Neurophysiol. 16, 37–68 (1953).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Lee, B. B., Martin, P. R. & Valberg, A. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 414, 245–263 (1989).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Gur, M. & Snodderly, M. Vision Res. 37, 377–382 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Verstraten, F. A. J., Cavanagh, P. & Labianca, A. Vision Res. 40, 3651–3664 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Lu, Z. & Sperling, G. Vision Res. 35, 2697–2722 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by an NEI NRSA graduate fellowship to A.O.H. and EY09258 to P.C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Vision Sciences Laboratory, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, 02138, Massachusetts, USA
    Alex O. Holcombe & Patrick Cavanagh

Authors

  1. Alex O. Holcombe
  2. Patrick Cavanagh

Corresponding author

Correspondence toAlex O. Holcombe.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holcombe, A., Cavanagh, P. Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception.Nat Neurosci 4, 127–128 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/83945

Download citation

This article is cited by