Production of spider silk proteins in tobacco and potato (original) (raw)

Nature Biotechnology volume 19, pages 573–577 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

Spider dragline silk is a proteinaceous fiber with remarkable mechanical properties that make it attractive for technical applications. Unfortunately, the material cannot be obtained in large quantities from spiders. We have therefore generated transgenic tobacco and potato plants that express remarkable amounts of recombinant Nephila clavipes dragline proteins. Using a gene synthesis approach, the recombinant proteins exhibit homologies of >90% compared to their native models. Here, we demonstrate the accumulation of recombinant silk proteins, which are encoded by synthetic genes of 420–3,600 base pairs, up to a level of at least 2% of total soluble protein in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of tobacco and potato leaves and potato tubers, respectively. Using the present expression system, spider silk proteins up to 100 kDa could be detected in plant tissues. When produced in plants, the recombinant spidroins exhibit extreme heat stability—a property that is used to purify the spidroins by a simple and efficient procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tirrell, D.A. Putting a new spin on spider silk. Science 271, 39–40 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Hinman, M.B., Jones, J.A. & Lewis R.V. Synthetic spider silk: a modular fibre. TIBTECH 18, 374–379 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Gosline, J.M., Guerette, P.A., Ortlepp, C.S. & Savage, K.N. The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. J. Exp. Biol. 23, 3295–3303 (1999).
    Google Scholar
  4. Hood, E.E. & Jilka, J.M. Plant-based production of xenogenic proteins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10, 382–386 (2000).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Fiedler, U., Phillips, J., Artsaenko, O. & Conrad, U. Optimization of scFv production in transgenic plants. Immunotechnology 3, 205–216 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Munro, S. & Pelham, H.R. A C-terminal signal prevents secretion of luminal ER proteins. Cell 48, 899–907 (1987).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Saito, K., Keneko, H., Yyamazaki, M., Yoshida, M. & Murakoshi, I. Stable transfer and expression of chimeric genes in licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis) using an Ri plasmid binary vector. Plant Cell Rep. 6, 718–721 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Bevan, M. Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acid Res. 12, 8711–8721 (1984).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Fahnestock, S.R. & Irwin, S.L. Synthetic spider dragline silk proteins and their production in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 47, 23–32 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Wandelt, C.I. et al. Vicilin with carboxy-terminal KDEL is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum and accumulates to high levels in the leaves of transgenic plants. Plant J. 2, 181–192 (1992).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Prince, J.T., McGrath, K.P., DiGirolamo, C.M. & Kaplan, D.L. Construction, cloning, and expression of synthetic genes encoding spider dragline silk. Biochemistry 34, 10879–10885 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Artsaenko, O. et al. Expression of a single-chain Fv antibody against abscisic acid creates a wilty phenotype in transgenic tobacco. Plant J. 8, 745–750 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Zambriski, P. et al. Ti-plasmid vector for introduction of DNA into plant cells without altering their normal regeneration capacity. EMBO J. 2, 2143–2150 (1983).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Conrad, U., Fiedler, U., Artsaenko, O. & Phillips, J. Single-chain Fv antibodies expressed in plants. In Methods in biotechnology—recombinant proteins from plants: production and isolation of clinically useful compounds. (eds Cunningham, C. & Porter, A.) 103–127 (Humana Press, Totowa, NJ; 1997).
    Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank K. Heinemann (Rudolstadt) for initial ideas and discussions, and I. Tiroke, I. Pfort, and C. Helmold for excellent technical assistance. This study was supported by the Bundesministerium für Landwirtschaft und Forsten represented by Fachagentur für Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (98NR050).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung Gatersleben, Corrensstraße 3, Gatersleben, D-06466, Germany
    Jürgen Scheller & Udo Conrad
  2. Institut für Molekulare Biotechnologie e. V., PF 100 813, Jena, D-07708, Germany
    Karl-Heinz Gührs & Frank Grosse

Authors

  1. Jürgen Scheller
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Karl-Heinz Gührs
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Frank Grosse
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Udo Conrad
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toUdo Conrad.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheller, J., Gührs, KH., Grosse, F. et al. Production of spider silk proteins in tobacco and potato.Nat Biotechnol 19, 573–577 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/89335

Download citation