Which COVID studies pose a biohazard? Lack of clarity hampers research (original) (raw)
- NEWS
- 21 October 2022
Controversy surrounding a study that involved modifying the SARS-CoV-2 virus has prompted researchers to call for better guidance from funders.
By
- Ewen Callaway
- Max Kozlov
When researchers at Boston University (BU) in Massachusetts inserted a gene from the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 into a strain of the virus from the beginning of the pandemic, they were trying to understand why Omicron causes mild disease.
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Nature 611, 17-18 (2022)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03344-w
References
Related Articles
-
Omicron boosters could arm you against variants that don't yet exist -
COVID variants found in sewage weeks before showing up in tests -
Billion-dollar project aims to prep drugs before the next pandemic -
The pandemic’s true health cost: how much of our lives has COVID stolen? -
How months-long COVID infections could seed dangerous new variants
Subjects
Latest on:
Steric hindrance of antibody binding in an Omicron spike fusion intermediate Article 06 MAY 26
HIV-1 signalling remodels nuclear pores to licence infection Article 06 MAY 26
Heart-nosed bat alphacoronaviruses use human CEACAM6 to enter cells Article 22 APR 26
Steric hindrance of antibody binding in an Omicron spike fusion intermediate Article 06 MAY 26
Almost half of traded wildlife carries disease-causing pathogens News 09 APR 26
COVID’s origins: what we do and don’t know Comment 24 FEB 26