Reliability and validity of the 3DNX accelerometer during mechanical and human treadmill exercise testing (original) (raw)

International Journal of Obesity volume 35, pages S88–S97 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the 3DNX triaxial accelerometer in a laboratory and mechanical setting.

Methods:

Experiment 1: A total of 10 units were fixed to a Multi-axis shaker table. A schedule comprising a range of accelerations was repeated on two occasions along each of the three measurement axes. Experiment 2: A total of 11 recreationally active individuals completed a treadmill protocol (4–20 km hr−1) on two occasions. Two 3DNX accelerometers were secured to the lower back, logging data every 5 s. Oxygen uptake was measured using the Douglas Bag technique. Reliability inter- and intra-units were assessed using a combination of limits of agreement (LoA), coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Validity was assessed using simple linear regression. All data are expressed in counts per 5 s (counts 5 s−1).

Results:

Experiment 1: CVintra ranged from 0.0 to 8.9% in all axes. The absolute bias±95% LoA values were all below four counts 5 s−1. CVinter did not rise above 4.5%. ICCs were 1.0 for all stages in all axes. The relationship between 3DNX counts and acceleration yielded an _R_2 value of 0.99 and a standard error of the estimate (SEE) of six counts 5 s−1. Experiment 2: CVinter ranged from 7.7 to 16.0% for trial 1 and from 7.7 to 16.2% for trial 2. ICCs between units ranged from 0.95 to 1.00 for trial 1 and from 0.90 to 0.99 for trial 2. Mean ratio bias±95% LoA values for intra-unit and inter-unit reliability were −0.7% (_P_>0.05)±12.4% and 0.4% (_P_>0.05)±5.6%, respectively. The relationship between _V̇_O2 and 3DNX counts for walking and running was linear (_R_2=0.65, SEE=1.42 ml kg−1 min−1; _R_2=0.62, SEE=3.63 ml kg−1 min−1).

Conclusion:

The 3DNX accelerometer is a reliable and valid device for measuring acceleration in a mechanical setting and during human treadmill exercise.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995; 273: 402–407.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Reilly JJ . Obesity in childhood and adolescence: evidence based clinical and public health perspectives. Postgrad Med J 2006; 82: 429–437.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Maddison R, Jiang Y, Hoorn SV, Mhurchu CN, Lawes CM, Rodgers A et al. Estimating energy expenditure with the RT3 triaxial accelerometer. Res Q Exerc Sport 2009; 80: 249–256.
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Plasqui G, Westerterp KR . Physical activity assessment with accelerometers: an evaluation against doubly labeled water. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007; 15: 2371–2379.
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Pober DM, Staudenmayer J, Raphael C, Freedson PS . Development of novel techniques to classify physical activity mode using accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 1626–1634.
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Chen KY, Bassett Jr DR . The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37 (11 Suppl): S490–S500.
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Chu EY, McManus AM, Yu CC . Calibration of the RT3 accelerometer for ambulation and nonambulation in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39 (11): 2085–2091.
    Article Google Scholar
  8. McKenzie KL . 2009 C.H. McCloy Lecture. Seeing is believing: observing physical activity and its contexts. Res Q Exerc Sport 2010; 81: 113–122.
    PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Esliger DW, Tremblay MS . Technical reliability assessment of three accelerometer models in a mechanical setup. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 2173–2181.
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW . A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32 (9 Suppl): S489–S497.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Plasqui G, Joosen AM, Kester AD, Goris AH, Westerterp KR . Measuring free-living energy expenditure and physical activity with triaxial accelerometry. Obes Res 2005; 13: 1363–1369.
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P . Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32 (9 Suppl): S442–S449.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR . Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37 (11 Suppl): S531–S543.
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Campbell KL, Crocker PR, McKenzie DC . Field evaluation of energy expenditure in women using Tritrac accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 1667–1674.
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Fudge BW, Wilson J, Easton C, Irwin L, Clark J, Haddow O et al. Estimation of oxygen uptake during fast running using accelerometry and heart rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 192–198.
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Richmond V, Wilkinson D, Carter J, Blacker S, Rayson M . Validity of the 3DNX™ accelerometer for predicting oxygen uptake. International Conference on Contemporary Ergonomics. Routledge: London, UK, 2007.
    Google Scholar
  17. Carter J, Wilkinson D, Blacker S, Rayson M, Bilzon J, Izard R et al. An investigation of a novel three-dimensional activity monitor to predict free-living energy expenditure. J Sports Sci 2008; 26: 553–561.
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Metcalf BS, Curnow JS, Evans C, Voss LD, Wilkin TJ . Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: the EarlyBird Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 1533–1537.
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Bammann K, Sioen I, Huybrechts I, Casajús JA, Vicente-Rodríguez G, Cuthill R et al. The IDEFICS validation study on field methods for assessing physical activity and body composition in children: design and recruitment results. Int J Obes 2011; 35 (Suppl 1): S79–S87.
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Bhattacharya A, McCutcheon EP, Shvartz E, Greenleaf JE . Body acceleration distribution and O2 uptake in humans during running and jumping. J Appl Physiol 1980; 49: 881–887.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Sun M, Hill JO . A method for measuring mechanical work and work efficiency during human activities. J Biomech 1993; 26: 229–241.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Brage S, Wedderkopp N, Franks PW, Andersen LB, Froberg K . Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1447–1454.
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Hagan RD, Strathman T, Strathman L, Gettman LR . Oxygen uptake and energy expenditure during horizontal treadmill running. J Appl Physiol 1980; 49: 571–575.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Powell SM, Jones DI, Rowlands AV . Technical variability of the RT3 accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1773–1778.
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ . Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005; 59: 561–570.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Krasnoff JB, Kohn MA, Choy FK, Doyle J, Johansen K, Painter PL . Interunit and intraunit reliability of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer. J Phys Act Health 2008; 5: 527–538.
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Trost SG, Ward DS, Moorehead SM, Watson PD, Riner W, Burke JR . Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 629–633.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Zijlstra W, Hof, AL . Displacement of the pelvis during human walking: experimental data and model predictions. Gait Posture 1997; 6: 249–262.
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow Jr JR . Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1637–1645.
    PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Andrew Plummer, Mr Bernard Roe and the mechanical engineering department at the University of Bath for the use of the MAST rig and for their technical support. This study was conducted as part of the IDEFICS study (http://www.idefics.eu). We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the European Community within the Sixth RTD Framework Programme under Contract No. 016181 (FOOD). All authors have received grant support from Optimal Performance Ltd.

The information in this document reflects the authors’ view and is provided as is.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Health, Sport Health and Exercise Science, University of Bath, Bath, UK
    F E Horner & J L J Bilzon
  2. Optimal Performance Ltd, Bristol, UK
    F E Horner & M P Rayson
  3. BioTel Ltd, Bristol, UK
    M P Rayson

Authors

  1. F E Horner
  2. M P Rayson
  3. J L J Bilzon

Consortia

on behalf of the IDEFICS Consortium

Corresponding author

Correspondence toF E Horner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

MR is a director of BioTel Ltd and has declared equity ownership/stock options with BioTel Ltd and Optimal Performance Ltd. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horner, F., Rayson, M., Bilzon, J. et al. Reliability and validity of the 3DNX accelerometer during mechanical and human treadmill exercise testing.Int J Obes 35 (Suppl 1), S88–S97 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.39

Download citation

Keywords

This article is cited by