Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth (original) (raw)

Nature volume 420, pages 186–189 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

Annotated genome sequences1,2 can be used to reconstruct whole-cell metabolic networks3,4,5,6. These metabolic networks can be modelled and analysed (computed) to study complex biological functions7,8,9,10,11. In particular, constraints-based in silico models12 have been used to calculate optimal growth rates on common carbon substrates, and the results were found to be consistent with experimental data under many but not all conditions13,14. Optimal biological functions are acquired through an evolutionary process. Thus, incorrect predictions of in silico models based on optimal performance criteria may be due to incomplete adaptive evolution under the conditions examined. Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 grows sub-optimally on glycerol as the sole carbon source. Here we show that when placed under growth selection pressure, the growth rate of E. coli on glycerol reproducibly evolved over 40 days, or about 700 generations, from a sub-optimal value to the optimal growth rate predicted from a whole-cell in silico model. These results open the possibility of using adaptive evolution of entire metabolic networks to realize metabolic states that have been determined a priori based on in silico analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blattner, F. R. et al. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277, 1453–1474 (1997)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Drell, D. The Department of Energy Microbial Cell Project: a 180° paradigm shift for biology. OMICS 6, 3–9 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Covert, M. W. et al. Metabolic modeling of microbial strains in silico. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 179–186 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Selkov, E., Maltsev, N., Olsen, G. J., Overbeek, R. & Whitman, W. B. A reconstruction of the metabolism of Methanococcus jannaschii from sequence data. Gene 197, GC11–GC26 (1997)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Overbeek, R. et al. WIT: integrated system for high-throughput genome sequence analysis and metabolic reconstruction. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 123–125 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Karp, P. D. et al. The EcoCyc database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 56–58 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Gombert, A. K. & Nielsen, J. Mathematical modelling of metabolism. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11, 180–186 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Tomita, M. et al. E-CELL: software environment for whole-cell simulation. Bioinformatics 15, 72–84 (1999)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Fell, D. Understanding the Control of Metabolism (Portland, London, 1996)
    Google Scholar
  10. Schuster, S., Fell, D. A. & Dandekar, T. A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks. Nature Biotechnol. 18, 326–332 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Schilling, C. H. et al. Genome-scale metabolic model of Helicobacter pylori 26695. J. Bacteriol. 184, 4582–4593 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, J. S. & Palsson, B. O. The Escherichia coli MG 1655 in silico metabolic genotype: its definition, characteristics, and capabilities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5528–5533 (2000)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  13. Varma, A. & Palsson, B. O. Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 3724–3731 (1994)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  14. Edwards, J. S., Ibarra, R. U. & Palsson, B. O. In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nature Biotechnol. 19, 125–130 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Palsson, B. O. The challenges of in silico biology. Nature Biotechnol. 18, 1147–1150 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Edwards, J. S., Ramakrishna, R., Schilling, C. H. & Palsson, B. O. Metabolic Engineering (eds Lee, S. Y. and Papoutsakis, E. T.) (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999)
    Google Scholar
  17. Bonarius, H. P. J., Schmid, G. & Tramper, J. Flux analysis of underdetermined metabolic networks: The quest for the missing constraints. Trends Biotechnol. 15, 308–314 (1997)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Varma, A. & Palsson, B. O. Metabolic flux balancing: basic concepts, scientific and practical use. Bio/Technology 12, 994–998 (1994)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Wiechert, W. Modeling and simulation: tools for metabolic engineering. J. Biotechnol. 94, 37–63 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Schilling, C. H., Edwards, J. S., Letscher, D. & Palsson, B. O. Combining pathway analysis with flux balance analysis for the comprehensive study of metabolic systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 71, 286–306 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Edwards, J. S., Ramakrishna, R. & Palsson, B. O. Characterizing the metabolic phenotype: a phenotype phase plane analysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 77, 27–36 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Weikert, C., Sauer, U. & Bailey, J. E. Use of a glycerol-limited, long-term chemostat for isolation of Escherichia coli mutants with improved physiological properties. Microbiology 143, 1567–1574 (1997)
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Ramos, J. DiTonno, S. Fong, J. Marciniak, N. Short and H. Bialy for technical assistance and for reviewing the manuscript. We acknowledge funding support from the National Institutes for Health and the National Science Foundation, and the Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Rafael U. Ibarra and Jeremy S. Edwards: These authors contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California, 92093-0412, USA
    Rafael U. Ibarra & Bernhard O. Palsson
  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Delaware, Delaware, 19716, Newark, USA
    Jeremy S. Edwards

Authors

  1. Rafael U. Ibarra
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Jeremy S. Edwards
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Bernhard O. Palsson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toBernhard O. Palsson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

We have filed a patent about the subject matter of this paper which has been licensed to Genomatica, Inc., a University of California at San Diego spin-off company. The University of California at San Diego, J.S.E. and B.Ø.P. hold interests in this company.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibarra, R., Edwards, J. & Palsson, B. Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth.Nature 420, 186–189 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01149

Download citation

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.