Dynamic control of positional information in the early Drosophila embryo (original) (raw)

Nature volume 430, pages 368–371 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

Morphogen gradients contribute to pattern formation by determining positional information in morphogenetic fields1,2. Interpretation of positional information is thought to rely on direct, concentration-threshold-dependent mechanisms for establishing multiple differential domains of target gene expression1,3,4. In Drosophila, maternal gradients establish the initial position of boundaries for zygotic gap gene expression, which in turn convey positional information to pair-rule and segment-polarity genes, the latter forming a segmental pre-pattern by the onset of gastrulation5,6,7. Here we report, on the basis of quantitative gene expression data, substantial anterior shifts in the position of gap domains after their initial establishment. Using a data-driven mathematical modelling approach8,9,10,11, we show that these shifts are based on a regulatory mechanism that relies on asymmetric gap–gap cross-repression and does not require the diffusion of gap proteins. Our analysis implies that the threshold-dependent interpretation of maternal morphogen concentration is not sufficient to determine shifting gap domain boundary positions, and suggests that establishing and interpreting positional information are not independent processes in the Drosophila blastoderm.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolpert, L. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J. Theor. Biol. 25, 1–47 (1969)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Crick, F. Diffusion in embryogenesis. Nature 225, 420–422 (1970)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Lewis, J., Slack, J. M. W. & Wolpert, L. Thresholds in development. J. Theor. Biol. 65, 579–590 (1977)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Gurdon, J. B. & Bourillot, P. Y. Morphogen gradient interpretation. Nature 413, 797–803 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Nüsslein-Volhard, C. & Wieschaus, E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287, 795–801 (1980)
    Article ADS PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Akam, M. The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Development 101, 1–22 (1987)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Ingham, P. W. The molecular genetics of embryonic pattern formation in Drosophila. Nature 335, 25–34 (1988)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Mjolsness, E., Sharp, D. H. & Reinitz, J. A connectionist model of development. J. Theor. Biol. 152, 429–453 (1991)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Reinitz, J., Mjolsness, E. & Sharp, D. H. Cooperative control of positional information in Drosophila by bicoid and maternal hunchback. J. Exp. Zool. 271, 47–56 (1995)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Reinitz, J. & Sharp, D. H. Mechanism of eve stripe formation. Mech. Dev. 49, 133–158 (1995)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Reinitz, J., Kosman, D., Vanario-Alonso, C. E. & Sharp, D. H. Stripe forming architecture of the gap gene system. Dev. Gen. 23, 11–27 (1998)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Driever, W. & Nüsslein-Volhard, C. The Bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner. Cell 54, 95–104 (1988)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Ephrussi, A. & St Johnston, D. Seeing is believing: the Bicoid morphogen gradient matures. Cell 116, 143–152 (2004)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Simpson-Brose, M., Treisman, J. & Desplan, C. Synergy between the Hunchback and Bicoid morphogens is required for anterior patterning in Drosophila. Cell 78, 855–865 (1994)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Houchmandzadeh, B., Wieschaus, E. & Leibler, S. Establishment of developmental precision and proportions in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature 415, 798–802 (2002)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Jaeger, J. et al. Dynamical analysis of regulatory interactions in the gap gene system of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics (in the press)
  17. Gaul, U., Seifert, E., Schuh, R. & Jäckle, H. Analysis of Krüppel protein distribution during early Drosophila development reveals posttranscriptional regulation. Cell 50, 639–647 (1987)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  18. McGinnis, W. & Krumlauf, R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68, 283–302 (1992)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Meinhardt, H. Space-dependent cell determination under the control of a morphogen gradient. J. Theor. Biol. 74, 307–321 (1978)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Waddington, C. H. Organisers and Genes (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1940)
    Google Scholar
  21. Kosman, D., Small, S. & Reinitz, J. Rapid preparation of a panel of polyclonal antibodies to Drosophila segmentation proteins. Dev. Genes Evol. 208, 290–294 (1998)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Myasnikova, E., Samsonova, A., Kozlov, K., Samsonova, M. & Reinitz, J. Registration of the expression patterns of Drosophila segmentation genes by two independent methods. Bioinformatics 17, 3–12 (2001)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Tsai, C. & Gergen, J. P. Gap gene properties of the pair-rule gene runt during Drosophila segmentation. Development 120, 1671–1683 (1994)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Nagaso, H., Murata, T., Day, N. & Yokoyama, K. K. Simultaneous detection of RNA and protein by in situ hybridization and immunological staining. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 49, 1177–1182 (2001)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. & Flannery, B. P. Numerical Recipes in C (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1992)
    MATH Google Scholar
  26. Chu, K. W., Deng, Y. & Reinitz, J. Parallel simulated annealing by mixing of states. J. Comp. Phys. 148, 646–662 (1999)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  27. Foe, V. E. & Alberts, B. M. Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 61, 31–70 (1983)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. P. Gergen for the constructs for RNA probes; and N. Monk, J. Dallman, J. D. Baker and L. Carey for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported financially by the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, and Center for Developmental Genetics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, 11794-3600, USA
    Johannes Jaeger, Hilde Janssens, Manu, Carlos E. Vanario-Alonso & John Reinitz
  2. Department of Computational Biology, Center for Advanced Studies, St Petersburg State Polytechnic University, St Petersburg, 195251, Russia
    Svetlana Surkova, Maxim Blagov, Konstantin N. Kozlov, Ekaterina Myasnikova & Maria Samsonova
  3. Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, California, 92093, USA
    David Kosman
  4. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21949-900, Brazil
    Carlos E. Vanario-Alonso
  5. Applied Physics Division, and Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87545, USA
    David H. Sharp

Authors

  1. Johannes Jaeger
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Svetlana Surkova
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Maxim Blagov
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Hilde Janssens
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. David Kosman
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Konstantin N. Kozlov
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Manu
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Ekaterina Myasnikova
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Carlos E. Vanario-Alonso
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Maria Samsonova
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. David H. Sharp
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. John Reinitz
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toJohn Reinitz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This contains: Supplementary Discussion (a detailed description of gap gene circuit models and their parameters, as well as additional results concerning shifts of anterior and posterior gap domain boundaries based on analysis of selected gap gene circuits with or without diffusion), Supplementary Figures 5–20 (integrated with Discussion), Supplementary Table 1 (integrated with Discussion) and References. (PDF 610 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaeger, J., Surkova, S., Blagov, M. et al. Dynamic control of positional information in the early Drosophila embryo.Nature 430, 368–371 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02678

Download citation

This article is cited by