Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2 (original) (raw)

Nature volume 440, pages 922–925 (2006) Cite this article

Abstract

Enhanced plant biomass accumulation in response to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration could dampen the future rate of increase in CO2 levels and associated climate warming. However, it is unknown whether CO2-induced stimulation of plant growth and biomass accumulation will be sustained or whether limited nitrogen (N) availability constrains greater plant growth in a CO2-enriched world1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Here we show, after a six-year field study of perennial grassland species grown under ambient and elevated levels of CO2 and N, that low availability of N progressively suppresses the positive response of plant biomass to elevated CO2. Initially, the stimulation of total plant biomass by elevated CO2 was no greater at enriched than at ambient N supply. After four to six years, however, elevated CO2 stimulated plant biomass much less under ambient than enriched N supply. This response was consistent with the temporally divergent effects of elevated CO2 on soil and plant N dynamics at differing levels of N supply. Our results indicate that variability in availability of soil N and deposition of atmospheric N are both likely to influence the response of plant biomass accumulation to elevated atmospheric CO2. Given that limitations to productivity resulting from the insufficient availability of N are widespread in both unmanaged and managed vegetation5,7,8,9, soil N supply is probably an important constraint on global terrestrial responses to elevated CO2.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 52 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.83 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Effects of CO 2 and N on total plant biomass over time.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2001)
    Google Scholar
  2. Rastetter, E. B., Agren, G. I. & Shaver, G. R. Responses of N-limited ecosystems to increased CO2: a balanced-nutrition coupled-element-cycles model. Ecol. Appl. 7, 444–460 (1997)
    Google Scholar
  3. McMurtrie, R. E., Dewar, R. C., Medlyn, B. E. & Jeffreys, M. P. Effects of rising CO2 on growth and carbon sequestration in forests: a modelling analysis of the consequences of altered litter quantity and quality. Plant Soil 224, 135–152 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Zak, D. R., Pregitzer, K. S., Curtis, P. S. & Holmes, W. E. Atmospheric CO2 and the composition and function of soil microbial communities. Ecol. Appl. 10, 47–59 (2000)
    Google Scholar
  5. Oren, R. et al. Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2 enriched world. Nature 411, 469–472 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  6. Shaw, M. R. et al. Grassland responses to global environmental changes suppressed by elevated CO2 . Science 298, 1987–1990 (2002)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  7. Hungate, B. A., Dukes, J. S., Shaw, M. R., Luo, Y. Q. & Field, C. B. Nitrogen and climate change. Science 302, 1512–1513 (2003)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Luo, Y. et al. Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Bioscience 54, 731–739 (2004)
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Schneider, M. K. et al. Ten years of free-air CO2 enrichment altered the mobilization of N from soil in Lolium perenne L. swards. Glob. Change Biol. 10, 1377–1388 (2004)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  10. Lloyd, J. & Farquhar, G. D. The CO2 dependence of photosynthesis, plant growth responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations, and their interactions with soil nutrient status. I. General principles and forest ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 10, 4–32 (1996)
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Peterson, A. G. et al. The photosynthesis–leaf nitrogen relationship at ambient and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide: a meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 5, 331–346 (1999)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  12. Zak, D. R., Holmes, W. E., Finzi, A. C., Norby, R. J. & Schlesinger, W. H. Soil nitrogen cycling under elevated CO2: a synthesis of forest face experiments. Ecol. Appl. 13, 1508–1514 (2003)
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Vitousek, P. M. et al. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol. Appl. 7, 737–750 (1997)
    Google Scholar
  14. Luo, Y., Field, C. B. & Mooney, H. A. Predicting responses of photosynthesis and root fraction to elevated [CO2]: interactions among carbon, nitrogen and growth. Plant Cell Environ. 17, 1195–1204 (1994)
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Cannell, M. & Thornley, J. N-poor ecosystems may respond more to elevated [CO2] than N-rich ones in the long term. A model analysis of grassland. Glob. Change Biol. 4, 431–442 (1998)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  16. Gill, R. A. et al. Nonlinear grassland responses to past and future atmospheric CO2 . Nature 417, 279–282 (2002)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  17. Williams, M. A., Rice, C. W. & Owensby, C. E. Carbon dynamics and microbial activity in tallgrass prairie exposed to elevated CO2 for 8 years. Plant Soil 227, 127–137 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Reich, P. B. et al. Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature 410, 809–812 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  19. Finzi, A. C. & Schlesinger, W. H. Soil-nitrogen cycling in a pine forest exposed to 5 years of elevated carbon dioxide. Ecosystems 6, 444–456 (2003)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Owensby, C. E., Auen, L. M. & Coyne, P. I. Biomass production in a nitrogen fertilized, tallgrass prairie ecosystem exposed to ambient and elevated levels of CO2 . Plant Soil 165, 105–113 (1994)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Zanetti, S. et al. Does nitrogen nutrition restrict the CO2 response of fertile grassland lacking legumes? Oecologia 112, 17–25 (1997)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  22. Zak, D. R., Pregitzer, K. S., Curtis, P. S. & Holmes, W. E. Atmospheric CO2 and the composition and function of soil microbial communities. Ecol. Appl. 10, 47–59 (2000)
    Google Scholar
  23. Reich, P. B. et al. Species and functional diversity independently influence biomass accumulation and its response to CO2 and N. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10101–10106 (2004)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  24. Galloway, J. N. et al. The nitrogen cascade. Bioscience 53, 341–356 (2003)
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Reich, P. B. et al. Do species and functional groups differ in acquisition and use of C, N and water under varying atmospheric CO2 and N availability regimes? A field test with 16 grassland species. New Phytol. 150, 435–448 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Lee, T. D., Tjoelker, M. G., Ellsworth, D. S. & Reich, P. B. Leaf gas exchange responses of 13 prairie grassland species in the field under elevated carbon dioxide and increased nitrogen supply. New Phytol. 150, 405–418 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Craine, J. M., Wedin, D. A. & Reich, P. B. The response of soil CO2 flux to changes in atmospheric CO2, nitrogen supply, and plant diversity. Glob. Change Biol. 7, 947–953 (2001)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  28. Dijkstra, F., Hobbie, S., Reich, P. & Knops, J. Divergent effects of elevated CO2, N fertilization, and plant diversity on soil C and N dynamics in a grassland field experiment. Plant Soil 272, 41–52 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Lüscher, A., Hartwig, U. A., Suter, D. & Nösberger, J. Direct evidence that in fertile grassland symbiotic N2 fixation is an important trait for a strong response of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2 . Glob. Change Biol. 6, 655–662 (2000)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  30. Hungate, B. A. et al. CO2 elicits long-term decline in nitrogen fixation. Science 304, 1291 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the US Department of Energy Program for Ecosystem Research, the National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological Research and Biocomplexity Coupled Biogeochemical Cycles Programs, and the University of Minnesota for supporting this research. Author Contributions All authors were involved in the design or implementation of the experiment, or both, with P.B.R. having the major responsibility for these. P.B.R., D.E., D.T., J.K. and S.N. were involved in the initial experimental design. J.T. was responsible for a substantial fraction of the experimental management and data collection, with smaller contributions in this area from T.L., D.E., J.B.W., J.K. and S.H. P.B.R. performed the statistical analyses and wrote the paper, with assistance from S.H., T.L., D.E., S.N. and J.B.W. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest Resources,
    Peter B. Reich, Tali Lee & Jared Trost
  2. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, 55108, St Paul, USA
    Sarah E. Hobbie, Jason B. West & David Tilman
  3. Department of Biology, University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, 54701, USA
    Tali Lee
  4. School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA
    David S. Ellsworth
  5. School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588, USA
    Johannes M. H. Knops
  6. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, 10027, USA
    Shahid Naeem

Authors

  1. Peter B. Reich
  2. Sarah E. Hobbie
  3. Tali Lee
  4. David S. Ellsworth
  5. Jason B. West
  6. David Tilman
  7. Johannes M. H. Knops
  8. Shahid Naeem
  9. Jared Trost

Corresponding author

Correspondence toPeter B. Reich.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reich, P., Hobbie, S., Lee, T. et al. Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2.Nature 440, 922–925 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04486

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

Nitrogen sets the scene

Future trends in atmospheric CO2 concentrations, and thus future climate, will depend in part on the degree to which terrestrial ecosystems can accumulate CO2 emissions from human activities. A six-year grassland field study has found that the biomass enhancement due to elevated CO2 declines over time under ambient nitrogen supply, but not under nitrogen enrichment, suggesting that both natural variation among soils and variation in nitrogen deposition rates are likely to influence plant biomass accumulation responses to elevated CO2. Nitrogen is a limiting factor in many managed and unmanaged soils, so soil nitrogen may be an important constraint on the global response to elevated CO2.