Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethol. Sociobiol.13, 171–195 (1992) Article Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am. Econ. Rev.90, 980–994 (2000) Article Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Rockenbach, B. Human altruism: economic, neural, and evolutionary perspectives. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.14, 784–790 (2004) ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Gürerk, Ö., Irlenbusch, B. & Rockenbach, B. The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science312, 108–111 (2006) ArticleADSPubMed Google Scholar
Sutter, M., Haigner, S. & Kocher, M. Choosing the stick or the carrot? Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations. CEPR Discussion Paper no. 5497 (Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, 2006)
Milinski, M., Semmann, D. & Krambeck, H.-J. Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature415, 424–426 (2002) ArticleADSPubMed Google Scholar
Panchanathan, K. & Boyd, R. Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem. Nature432, 499–502 (2004) ArticleADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Milinski, M., Semmann, D., Krambeck, H.-J. & Marotzke, J. Stabilizing the Earth’s climate is not a losing game: supporting evidence from public goods experiments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 3994–3998 (2006) ArticleADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ledyard, J. O. in Handbook of Experimental Economics (eds Kagel, J. H. & Roth, A. E.) 111–194 (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1995) Google Scholar
Botelho, A., Harrison, G. W., Pinto, L. M. C. & Rutström, E. E. Social norms and social choice. NIMA Working Paper no. 30 (Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada, Univ. Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2005)
Masclet, D., Noussair, C., Tucker, S. & Villeval, M.-C. Monetary and nonmonetary punishment in the voluntary contributions mechanism. Am. Econ. Rev.93, 366–380 (2003) Article Google Scholar
Sefton, M., Shupp, R. & Walker, J. The effect of sanctions in provision of public goods. CeDEx Discussion Paper no. 2002-02 (The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, Nottingham, 2002)
Alexander, R. D. The Biology of Moral Systems (de Gruyter, New York, 1987) Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature393, 573–577 (1998) ArticleADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bolton, G. E., Katok, E. & Ockenfels, A. Cooperation among strangers with limited information about reputation. J. Public Econ.89, 1457–1468 (2005) Article Google Scholar
Seinen, I. & Schram, A. Social status and group norms: Indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment. Eur. Econ. Rev.50, 581–602 (2006) Article Google Scholar
Bshary, R. & Grutter, A. S. Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature441, 975–978 (2006) ArticleADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Milinski, M. in Cooperation in Primates and Humans. Mechanisms and Evolution (eds Kappeler, P. M. & van Schaik, C. P.) 265–278 (Springer, New York, 2005) Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Rockenbach, B. Detrimental effects of sanctioning on human altruism. Nature422, 137–140 (2003) ArticleADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Haley, K. J. & Fessler, D. M. T. Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evol. Hum. Behav.26, 245–256 (2005) Article Google Scholar
Bateson, M., Nettle, D. & Roberts, G. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biol. Lett.2, 412–414 (2006) ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Brandt, H., Hauert, C. & Sigmund, K. Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B270, 1099–1104 (2003) Article Google Scholar
Fischbacher, U. Z-tree. Zurich Toolbox for Readymade Economic Experiments—Experimenter’s Manual. Working Paper no. 21 (Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Univ. Zurich, 1999)