Hyperion's sponge-like appearance (original) (raw)

Nature volume 448, pages 50–53 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Hyperion is Saturn’s largest known irregularly shaped satellite and the only moon observed to undergo chaotic rotation1,2,3. Previous work has identified Hyperion’s surface as distinct from other small icy objects4,5 but left the causes unsettled. Here we report high-resolution images that reveal a unique sponge-like appearance at scales of a few kilometres. Mapping shows a high surface density of relatively well-preserved craters two to ten kilometres across. We have also determined Hyperion’s size and mass, and calculated the mean density as 544 ± 50 kg m-3, which indicates a porosity of >40 per cent. The high porosity may enhance preservation of craters by minimizing the amount of ejecta produced or retained6,7, and accordingly may be the crucial factor in crafting this unusual surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klavetter, J. J. Rotation of Hyperion. I—Observations. Astron. J. 97, 570–579 (1989a)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  2. Klavetter, J. J. Rotation of Hyperion. II—Dynamics. Astron. J. 98, 1855–1874 (1989b)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  3. Black, G. J., Nicholson, P. D. & Thomas, P. C. Hyperion: rotational dynamics. Icarus 117, 149–161 (1995)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  4. Smith, B. A. et al. A new look at the Saturn system: the Voyager 2 images. Science 215, 504–537 (1982)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  5. Thomas, P. C., Black, G. J. & Nicholson, P. D. Hyperion: Rotation, shape, and geology from Voyager images. Icarus 117, 128–148 (1995)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  6. Housen, K. R. & Holsapple, K. A. Impact cratering on porous asteroids. Icarus 163, 102–119 (2003)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  7. Asphaug, E., Ryan, E. V. & Zuber, M. T. in Asteroids III (eds Bottke, W. F., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P. & Binzel, R. P.) 463–484 (Tucson, Univ. Arizona Press, 2002)
  8. Criddle, K. E. et al. Cassini orbit determination: the only targeted Hyperion flyby of the prime mission. 29th Annual AAS Guidance and Control Conference (Breckenridge, Colorado) AAS Paper∼06–082 (American Astronomical Soceiety, San Diego, California, 2006)
  9. Wisdom, J., Peale, S. J. & Mignard, F. The chaotic rotation of Hyperion. Icarus 58, 137–152 (1984)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  10. Binzel, R. P., Green, J. R. & Opal, C. B. Chaotic rotation of Hyperion? Nature 320, 511 (1986)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  11. Armstrong, J. W., Iess, L., Tortora, P. & Bertotti, B. Stochastic gravitational wave background: upper limits in the 10-6-10-3 Hz band. Astrophys. J. 599, 806–813 (2003)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  12. Clark, R. N., Fanale, F. P. & Gaffey, M. J. in Satellites (eds Burns, J. A. & Mathews, M. S.) 437–491 (Tucson, Univ. Arizona Press, 1986)
  13. Porco, C. C. et al. Physical characteristics and possible accretionary origins for Saturn's small satellites. Annu. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 37, 2289 (2006)
    ADS Google Scholar
  14. Porco, C. C. et al. Cassini imaging science: initial results on Phoebe and Iapetus. Science 307, 1237–1242 (2005)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  15. Chapman, C. R. et al. Impact history of Eros: craters and boulders. Icarus 155, 104–118 (2002)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  16. Pike, R. J. in Impact and Explosion Cratering (eds Roddy, D. J., Pepin, R. O. & Merrill, R. B.) 484–509 (Pergamon, New York, 1977)
  17. Melosh, H. J. Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process 1–253 (Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, No. 11, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1989)
  18. Richardson, J. E. & Melosh, H. J. Determining comet Tempel 1’s gravity, mass, and density via the ballistic behavior of the Deep Impact ejecta plume. Icarus (submitted).
  19. Sugita, S. et al. Subaru telescope observations of Deep Impact. Science 310, 274–278 (2005)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  20. Carr, M. H. et al. The geology of Gaspra. Icarus 107, 61–71 (1994)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  21. Schenk, P. M. Ganymede and Callisto—Complex crater formation and planetary crusts. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 15635–15664 (1991)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  22. Buratti, B. J., Hicks, M. D. & Davies, A. Spectrophotometry of the small satellites of Saturn and their relationship to Iapetus, Phoebe, and Hyperion. Icarus 175, 490–495 (2005)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  23. Cruikshank, D. P. et al. The dark side of Iapetus. Icarus 53, 90–104 (1983)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  24. Cruikshank, D. P. et al. Surface composition of Hyperion. Nature doi: 10.1038/nature05948 (this issue).
  25. Fanale, F. P. & Salvail, J. R. The water regime of asteroid (1) Ceres. Icarus 82, 97–110 (1989)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  26. Moore, J. M. et al. Mass movement and landform degradation on the icy Galilean satellites: results of the Galileo nominal mission. Icarus 240, 294–312 (1999)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  27. Delsemme, A. H. in Comets (ed. Wilkening, L. L.) 85–130 (Tucson, Univ. Arizona Press, 1982)
  28. Richardson, J. E., Melosh, H. J., Greenberg, R. J. & O'Brien, D. P. The global effects of impact-induced seismic activity on fractured asteroid surface morphology. Icarus 179, 325–349 (2005)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  29. Thomas, P. C. et al. Mathilde: size, shape, and geology. Icarus 140, 17–27 (1999)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  30. Thomas, P. C. Gravity, tides, and topography on small satellites and asteroids—Application to surface features of the Martian satellites. Icarus 105, 326–244 (1993)
    Article ADS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Technical assistance was provided by B. Carcich, K. Consroe, P. Smith and P. F. Helfenstein. G. Patton checked the crater tabulation on Phoebe and Hyperion. This work was funded in part by the Cassini project. A portion of this work was done at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract from NASA. The work of L.I., P.T. and L.S. was funded in part by the Italian Space Agency. The manuscript benefited from reviews by K. Housen and E. Asphaug.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA,
    P. C. Thomas, J. A. Burns, P. Helfenstein, J. Richardson & J. Veverka
  2. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA,
    J. W. Armstrong, S. W. Asmar, T. V. Johnson & N. Rappaport
  3. Institut für Geologische Wissenschaften, Freie Universität, 12249 Berlin, Germany,
    T. Denk
  4. Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Center, Rutherfordstrasse 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany,
    B. Giese
  5. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale ed Astronautica, Università La Sapienza, via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Roma, Italy,
    L. Iess & L. Somenzi
  6. Department of Planetary Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA,
    A. McEwen
  7. Physics and Astronomy Department, University of California at Los Angeles, Box 951547 Los Angeles, California 90095, USA,
    L. Nicolaisen
  8. Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street, Boulder, Colorado 80301, USA,
    C. Porco
  9. DIEM-II Facoltà di Ingegneria, Università di Bologna, Via Fontanelle, 4047100 Forlì, Italy,
    P. Tortora
  10. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, Maryland 20723, USA,
    E. P. Turtle

Authors

  1. P. C. Thomas
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. J. W. Armstrong
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. S. W. Asmar
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. J. A. Burns
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. T. Denk
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. B. Giese
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. P. Helfenstein
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. L. Iess
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. T. V. Johnson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. A. McEwen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. L. Nicolaisen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. C. Porco
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. N. Rappaport
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  14. J. Richardson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  15. L. Somenzi
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  16. P. Tortora
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  17. E. P. Turtle
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  18. J. Veverka
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toP. C. Thomas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table S1

This file contains Supplementary Table S1 which summarizes instantaneous spin pole solutions for Hyperion derived from control points measured in Cassini images. (PDF 38 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, P., Armstrong, J., Asmar, S. et al. Hyperion's sponge-like appearance.Nature 448, 50–53 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05779

Download citation

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Editorial Summary

Cassini's view of Hyperion

Saturn's moon Hyperion, an irregular shaped object in a tumbling orbit, looks odd: the Cassini flyby of September 2005 revealed a unique spongy surface. Two papers this week present the initial Cassini results. First, imaging and radio data suggest that the spongy appearance is caused by impact cratering on a porous body. And second, near-infrared and ultraviolet spectroscopy reveal details of the surface composition of the highly reflective areas that cover much of the surface, and also of the darker areas, mostly at the bottom of craters. The spectra are consistent with the presence of water ice contaminated with an organic solid. The low-albedo (dark) material is spectroscopically similar to that found on two other saturnian moons, Iapetus and Phoebe, containing a mixture of water ice, complex organics, carbon dioxide and nitriles. This cocktail of materials resembles those seen in comets and probably in Kuiper Belt objects.

Associated content