Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer (original) (raw)

Nature volume 449, pages 1044–1048 (2007) Cite this article

Abstract

The study of animal foraging behaviour is of practical ecological importance1, and exemplifies the wider scientific problem of optimizing search strategies2. Lévy flights are random walks, the step lengths of which come from probability distributions with heavy power-law tails3,4, such that clusters of short steps are connected by rare long steps. Lévy flights display fractal properties, have no typical scale, and occur in physical3,4,5 and chemical6 systems. An attempt to demonstrate their existence in a natural biological system presented evidence that wandering albatrosses perform Lévy flights when searching for prey on the ocean surface7. This well known finding2,4,8,9 was followed by similar inferences about the search strategies of deer10 and bumblebees10. These pioneering studies have triggered much theoretical work in physics (for example, refs 11, 12), as well as empirical ecological analyses regarding reindeer13, microzooplankton14, grey seals15, spider monkeys16 and fishing boats17. Here we analyse a new, high-resolution data set of wandering albatross flights, and find no evidence for Lévy flight behaviour. Instead we find that flight times are gamma distributed, with an exponential decay for the longest flights. We re-analyse the original albatross data7 using additional information, and conclude that the extremely long flights, essential for demonstrating Lévy flight behaviour, were spurious. Furthermore, we propose a widely applicable method to test for power-law distributions using likelihood18 and Akaike weights19,20. We apply this to the four original deer and bumblebee data sets10, finding that none exhibits evidence of Lévy flights, and that the original graphical approach10 is insufficient. Such a graphical approach has been adopted to conclude Lévy flight movement for other organisms13,14,15,16,17, and to propose Lévy flight analysis as a potential real-time ecosystem monitoring tool17. Our results question the strength of the empirical evidence for biological Lévy flights.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 52 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.83 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Turchin, P. Quantitative Analysis of Movement: Measuring and Modeling Population Redistribution in Animals and Plants (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1998)
    Google Scholar
  2. Shlesinger, M. F. Search research. Nature 443, 281–282 (2006)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  3. Shlesinger, M. F., Zaslavsky, G. M. & Frisch, U. Lévy Flights and Related Topics in Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1995)
    Book Google Scholar
  4. ben-Avraham, D. & Havlin, S. Diffusion and Reactions in Fractals and Disordered Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000)
    Book Google Scholar
  5. Bardou, F., Bouchaud, J.-P., Aspect, A. & Cohen-Tannoudji, C. Lévy Statistics and Laser Cooling: How Rare Events Bring Atoms to Rest (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2002)
    MATH Google Scholar
  6. Ott, A., Bouchaud, J. P., Langevin, D. & Urbach, W. Anomalous diffusion in “living polymers”: a genuine Lévy flight? Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2201–2204 (1990)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  7. Viswanathan, G. M. et al. Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses. Nature 381, 413–415 (1996)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  8. Metzler, R. & Klafter, J. The restaurant at the end of the random walk: recent developments in the description of anomalous transport by fractional dynamics. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37, R161–R208 (2004)
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  9. Klafter, J. & Sokolov, I. M. Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings. Phys. World 18, 29–32 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Viswanathan, G. M. et al. Optimizing the success of random searches. Nature 401, 911–914 (1999)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  11. Reynolds, A. M. Scale-free movement patterns arising from olfactory-driven foraging. Phys. Rev. E 72, 041928 (2005)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  12. Bénichou, O., Loverdo, C., Moreau, M. & Voituriez, R. Two-dimensional intermittent search processes: An alternative to Lévy flight strategies. Phys. Rev. E 74, 020102(R) (2006)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  13. Mårell, A., Ball, J. P. & Hofgaard, A. Foraging and movement paths of female reindeer: insights from fractal analysis, correlated random walks, and Lévy flights. Can. J. Zool. 80, 854–865 (2002)
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Bartumeus, F., Peters, F., Pueyo, S., Marrasé, C. & Catalan, J. Helical Lévy walks: Adjusting searching statistics to resource availability in microzooplankton. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12771–12775 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  15. Austin, D., Bowen, W. D. & McMillan, J. I. Intraspecific variation in movement patterns: modeling individual behaviour in a large marine predator. Oikos 105, 15–30 (2004)
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Ramos-Fernández, G. et al. Lévy walk patterns in the foraging movements of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55, 223–230 (2004)
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Bertrand, S., Burgos, J. M., Gerlotto, F. & Atiquipa, J. Lévy trajectories of Peruvian purse-seiners as an indicator of the spatial distribution of anchovy (Engraulis ringens). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62, 477–482 (2005)
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Hilborn, R. & Mangel, M. The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data (Vol. 28, Monographs in Population Biology, Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey, 1997)
    Google Scholar
  19. Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach 2nd edn (Springer, New York, 2002)
    MATH Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, J. B. & Omland, K. S. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 101–108 (2004)
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Afanasyev, V. A miniature storing activity recorder for seabird species with 80 bytes of memory for data storage. NERC Tech. 1, 4–7 (1993)
    Google Scholar
  22. Shlesinger, M. F. & Klafter, J. Lévy walks versus Lévy flights. In On Growth and Form: Fractal and Non-Fractal Patterns in Physics (eds Stanley, H. E. & Ostrowsky, N.) 279–283 (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1986)
    Chapter Google Scholar
  23. Newman, M. E. J. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp. Phys. 46, 323–351 (2005)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  24. Sims, D. W., Righton, D. R. & Pitchford, J. W. Minimizing errors in identifying Lévy flight behaviour of organisms. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 222–229 (2007)
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Pueyo, S. & Jovani, R. Comment on “A keystone mutualism drives pattern in a power function”. Science 313, 1739c (2006)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  26. Weimerskirch, H., Gault, A. & Cherel, Y. Prey distribution and patchiness: factors in foraging success and efficiency of wandering albatrosses. Ecology 86, 2611–2622 (2005)
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Focardi, S., Marcellini, P. & Montanaro, P. Do ungulates exhibit a food density threshold? A field study of optimal foraging and movement patterns. J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 606–620 (1996)
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Heinrich, B. Resource heterogeneity and patterns of movement in foraging bumblebees. Oecologia 40, 235–245 (1979)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  29. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research 3rd edn (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1995)
    MATH Google Scholar
  30. Pueyo, S. Diversity: between neutrality and structure. Oikos 112, 392–405 (2006)
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Rothery, W. Blanchard and L. Thomas for statistical advice, and R. Myers, I. Jonsen, G. Breed, S.-J. Dunn, F. de Moura, J. Cressoni and M. Lyra for discussions. We acknowledge the work by all fieldworkers involved, in particular thanking B. Phalan and I. Forster for deploying devices at Bird Island. We thank M. Francis, A. Fukuda and H. Higuchi for providing instruments used in 2004, and J. Croxall for supporting albatross research at Bird Island. This work was funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council and the Brazilian research agency CNPq. The work at the British Antarctic Survey represents a collaboration between the Discovery 2010 and Natural Complexity Programmes, and we appreciate P. Trathan’s efforts in facilitating it.

Author Contributions A.M.E. performed the analyses, computations and derivations presented in this paper, and led its preparation with input from all authors. The paper presents a synthesis of the work of two different teams of researchers who independently and concurrently conceived of re-examining the Lévy flight hypothesis with newer albatross data. One team (A) comprised N.W.W., M.P.F. and E.J.M. and was subsequently joined by A.M.E. The other team (B) comprised V.A., S.V.B., M.G.E.dL., E.P.R., H.E.S. and G.M.V.; R.A.P. provided albatross expertise to both teams. Team B were the first to show the implication of the long first and last dry sequences on the power-law distribution of albatross flight durations.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Andrew M. Edwards
    Present address: Present address: Pacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 3190 Hammond Bay Road, Nanaimo, British Columbia V9T 6N7, Canada.,

Authors and Affiliations

  1. British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK ,
    Andrew M. Edwards, Richard A. Phillips, Nicholas W. Watkins, Mervyn P. Freeman, Eugene J. Murphy & Vsevolod Afanasyev
  2. Center for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA,
    Sergey V. Buldyrev & H. Eugene Stanley
  3. Department of Physics, Yeshiva University, 500 West 185th Street, Room 1112, Belfer Hall, New York, New York 10033, USA,
    Sergey V. Buldyrev
  4. Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Paraná, C. P. 19044, 81531-990, Curitiba-PR, Brazil,
    M. G. E. da Luz
  5. Departamento de Física, Laboratório de Física Teórica e Computacional, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 50670-901, Recife-PE, Brazil,
    E. P. Raposo
  6. Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, 57072-970, Maceió-AL, Brazil ,
    Gandhimohan M. Viswanathan

Authors

  1. Andrew M. Edwards
  2. Richard A. Phillips
  3. Nicholas W. Watkins
  4. Mervyn P. Freeman
  5. Eugene J. Murphy
  6. Vsevolod Afanasyev
  7. Sergey V. Buldyrev
  8. M. G. E. da Luz
  9. E. P. Raposo
  10. H. Eugene Stanley
  11. Gandhimohan M. Viswanathan

Corresponding author

Correspondence toAndrew M. Edwards.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edwards, A., Phillips, R., Watkins, N. et al. Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer.Nature 449, 1044–1048 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06199

Download citation